Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.10.40.216”
ACCEPTED 08-24-00024-CV 08-24-00024-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 10/30/2024 3:34 PM
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytlepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS
Zimmerman v. Crothallpublic domain
OPINION PARSONS, Vice Chancellor. This case addresses the allegations of a minority unitholder in a privately held medical device company. The unitholder is the co-founder and former CEO of the company. He became a minority stakeholder after accepting investments in the company in exchange for units and after he sold some of his own units. The company is managed by a board of directors under its limited liab
CENTER FOR AZ v. AZ SECRETARY OF STATEpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC. ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees, KRISTIN MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., Intervenors/Appellees. No. CV-24-0295-PR
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S AND INTERVENOR’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD WILLIAMS, Judge Plaintiff, Communication Construction Services, Inc. (“CCS”) challenges the Army and Air Force Exchange Service’s (“AAFES”) award of a contract for internet and telecommunications servic
Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archivepublic domain
23-1260 Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 Argued: June 28, 2024 Decided: September 4, 2024 Docket No. 23-1260 HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS L.L.C., JOHN WILEY &
Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
US Dominion, Inc. v. Newsmax Media, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
Shamark Smith Limited Partnership, Sharon D. Marcus, and Paul J. Smith v. Martin M. Longoriapublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00698-CV 5573168 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/5/2015 10:24:41 PM JEF
Higgin v. Albence, Miles v. Dept. of Electionspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL HIGGIN and MICHAEL ) MENNELLA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2022-0641-NAC THE HONORABLE ANTHONY J. ) ALBENCE, in his official capacity as ) State Election Commissioner,
ACCEPTED 03-15-00657-CV 7565577 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, T
Doe v. Lambpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On October 6, 2011, plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I, LLC and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC (collectively “IV”) filed suit in this district against defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) alleging infringement of six patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,810,144 (“the 144 patent”), 6,412,953 (“the ’953 patent”), 7,409,450 (“the ’450
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
726 F.Supp.2d 396 (2010) SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT mbH,[1] Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. Cisco Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Defendant. Civ. Nos. 09-72-SLR, 09-232-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. July 26, 2010. *399
In Re Fort Bend County v. the State of Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2025 12:08 PM NO. 15-25-00102-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
in Re Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 14-15-00578-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/22/2015 3:45:09 PM