Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-2689 & 23-2857 _____________ MILLER PLASTIC PRODUCTS INC, Petitioner in no. 23-2689 v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD _____________ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner in no. 23-2857 v. MILLER PLASTIC PRODUCTS INC __________

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiff and patent holder Avenue Innovations, Inc. brought this action against Defendant E. Mishan & Sons Inc. alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,340,189 (the "'189 patent"). Since 2003, Plaintiff has sold the Handybar as a device to be used for assistanc

ORDER RE: POST-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY B. COLLINS, Chief Judge. After the jury trial and verdict in this case, the parties have filed several post-trial motions.. The following motions are resolved by this Order: (1) Defendants and Counter-claimants Staples, Inc., and Staples The Office Superstore, LLC’s (“Staples’”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 487); (2) Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendan

263 F.3d 394 (5th Cir. 2001) Matthews Smith, John Comeaux, John Lumpkins, Kenneth Ford, and Darlene Greene, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Texaco, Inc.; et al., Defendants,Aramco Services Company, Saudi Refining, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Star Enterprise, Texaco, Inc., Texaco Refining and Marketing Incorporated, and Texaco Refining and Marketing East, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 00-40337

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Pyrotechnic Specialties, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 57890, 58335, 59103 ) Under Contract No. W52PIJ-04-C-0098 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. David Karlson Chief Executive Officer APPEARANCES

[Cite as Gargasz, Inc. v. Lorain Cty., 2014-Ohio-3532.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) WANDA L. GARGASZ, et al. C.A. No. 13CA010477 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

686 F.2d 10 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3351, 111 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2591,222 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 95 Lab.Cas. P 13,739 GEORGE BANTA COMPANY, INC., BANTA DIVISION, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,Tri-Cities Local 382, Graphic Arts International Union,AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 81-1816. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Ci

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Before us is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or the “Board”) for enforcement of an August 20,1998 order (the “Order”) adopting, with modifications, the findings, conclusions, and recommended order of Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Raymond P. Green. See G & T Terminal Packaging Co., Inc., 326 N

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: In this appeal brought pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(f), the defendants challenge a class certification. Concluding that the attempted class does not meet the requirements of the applicable rules, we reverse and remand. I. This case has its origins in race discrimination claims made against Texaco, Inc. (“Texaco”), and its subsidiaries in Roberts v. Texa

341 B.R. 693 (2006) In re MESABA AVIATION, INC., dba Mesaba Airlines, Debtor. No. BKY 05-39258. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. May 18, 2006. *694 *695 *696 *697 *698

REVISED OCTOBER 25, 2001 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ m 00-40337 _______________ MATTHEWS SMITH, JOHN COMEAUX, JOHN LUMPKINS, KENNETH FORD, AND DARLENE GREENE, ET AL.,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AIRCRAFT SERVICE INTERNATIONAL, No. 12-36026 INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01729- v. JLR INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 117, OPINION Defendant, and WORKING WASHINGTON; ALEX POPESCU; JONATHAN R

CONTIE, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MILBURN, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 1340-1345), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. CONTIE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”), petitions for enforcement of an order of the Board finding respondent, Plainville Ready Mix Concrete Co. (“Plainville” or “the Company”), in violation of § 8(a

OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. These cases are before us on the consolidated petitions of Hedstrom Company, a subsidiary of Brown Group, Inc., to review and set aside two orders issued against it by the National Labor Relations Board and on a cross-petition by the Board for enforcement of these same orders. Two principal issues are presented. First, is the Board’s reinstatement of its remedial

INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge: This case is before the court on petition to review and set aside, and cross-application to enforce, an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board held, contrary to the trial examiner’s findings, that Sweeney & Company, petitioner herein, violated Sections 8(a) (1), (3) and (5) of the Labor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Derick Ortiz, v. Civil No. 19-cv-1025-JL Opinion No. 2023 DNH 015 Sig Sauer, Inc. MEMORANDUM ORDER The class action “predominance” requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), as applied to fraudulent concealment

663 F.2d 455 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2817, 92 Lab.Cas. P 13,059 PACEMAKER YACHT COMPANY, A DIVISION OF MISSION MARINE, INC.,Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 81-1036. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Sept. 15, 1981.Decided Oct. 30, 1981.

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: This petition for enforcement presents two issues: (1) whether a health care employer may enforce an individual notice rule after its employees’ union provides advance notice of an impending strike pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 158(g); and (2) whether health care employees who fail to report to work at individual patients’ homes without alerting their employer c

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Derick Ortiz, v. Civil No. 19-cv-1025-JL Opinion No. 2022 DNH 047 Sig Sauer, Inc. MEMORANDUM ORDER This is a putative class action concerning an alleged design defect in a semi- automatic pistol, the SIG P320. The defendant, Sig Sa

JUSTICE McCULLOUGH delivered the opinion of the court: Defendants, the Illinois Department of Employment Security (Department) and its Director, Lynn Quigley Doherty, appeal from the order of the circuit court of Macon County reversing on administrative review an award of unemployment benefits to 460 unemployment benefit claimants (claimants) who had participate