Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Stuart P. Durst and Julie A. Ward”
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Tolley v. Carboline Co.public domain
617 S.E.2d 508 (2005) 217 W.Va. 158 James Tolley and Nancy TOLLEY, his wife, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. CARBOLINE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware corporation, and Fina Oil and Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 31751. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. S
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM
Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc.public domain
964 S.W.2d 89 (1997) Margaret Hunt HILL, Individually, Margaret Hunt Hill, Executrix (of the Estate of Al G. Hill, Deceased), Margaret Hunt Hill, Trustee (of the Margaret Hunt Hill Marital Trust), Chester J. Donnally, Jr., Trustee (of the Margaret Hunt HillAlbert G. Hill, III, Trust, Heather Victoria Hill Trust, Elisa Margaret Hill Trust, Michael Busch Wisenbaker, Jr. Trust, Wesley Hill Wisenbaker Trust, Cody McArthur Wilert Trust and the Margretta Hill
United States v. Steinpublic domain
452 F.Supp.2d 230 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. In re United States of America, v. Jeffrey Stein, et al., Defendants. Jeffrey Stein, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KPMG LLP, Defendant. No. SI 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). No. 06 Civ. 5007(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 6, 2006.
City of Dallas v. Arredondopublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of
United States v. Burrpublic domain
MARSHALL, Chief Justice, remarked that it was not in the power of the marshal to summon more than twenty-four, as the act of assembly authorized1 only that number. If he should summon twenty-five, the last would not have power to act; and the marshal would have no power to displace any one of the others, to put-the last in his place. When the panel had been completed by the marshal, its deficiencies co