Cases

ROTHSCHILD, P.J. *526Global Sign Systems, Inc. (Global) sued Friendly Franchisees Corporation (FFC) to recover $114,823.72 allegedly owed on unpaid invoices. A few weeks before trial, the parties agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration. Five years later, the arbitrator, Retired Judge David D. Perez, awarded Global $1,154,793.72 in damages

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2026 ___________________________ Frederick Rozo lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Principal Life Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllll

OPINION AND ORDER Kelly, Judge: This action is before the court on US-CIT Rule 56.2 motions for judgment on the agency record challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) determination in the first administrative review of the antidumping duty (“ADD”) order covering crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from the People’s Republic of Ch

Stanceu, Chief Judge: *1315 Plaintiff Swimways Corporation ("Swimways") commenced this action to contest the denial of its administrative protests by U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("Customs"). Swimways claims that Customs erred in its determination of the tariff classification of mer

(2008) SUNGARD ENERGY SYSTEMS INC., Complainant, v. GAS TRANSMISSION NORTHWEST CORP., Respondent. Civil Action No. H-07-2205. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. Pending before the court is complainant SunGard Energy System Inc.'s ("Sun-Ga

ORDER Neil V. Wake, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 56) and the parties’ accompanying statements of facts and briefs. For the, reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted. I. INTRODUCTION St. Luke’s Behavioral Hospital, LP (“St. Luke’s”) is a hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. It is owned and operate

El Juez Asociado Señor Rivera García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Estos recursos nos brindan la oportunidad de expresar-nos sobre si el dueño de un bien que presuntamente se confiscó ilegalmente puede presentar una acción en daños y perjuicios contra el Estado dentro de la acción de impug-nación de confiscación. En ese contexto, el Departamento de Hacienda del Gobierno de Puerto Rico (parte peticiona-ria o e

Filed 8/15/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE HARSHAD & NASIR No. B269427 CORPORATION et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. BS155377) v. GLOBAL SIGN SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. _____________________

536 F.Supp.2d 181 (2008) NORTH AMERICAN CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Gerry CARDINALE, Rob Gheewalla, Jack Daly, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., GS Capital Partners, III, L.P., GS Capital Partners, III Offshore, L.P. and Goldman Sachs & Co. Verwaltungs GmbH, Defendants. No. C.A. 06-492-S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. March 5,

OPINION PER CURIAM: Because these cases present the major issue in common, we consolidate them for disposition. The appellants collectively claim that their indictments should have been dismissed because the district court’s charge to the grand jury misstated its constitutional role and function. Separately, they raise issues concerning Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Clark Waddoups, United States District Judge This is a tax case filed by the United States to collect unpaid federal estate taxes owed by the Estate of Hazel Anna S. Smith (“Estate”). This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 117), defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of the court’s prior order granting partial summary

*827OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced securities-fraud, putative class action alleges material misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants regarding Key Energy Services, Inc.’s (“Key’s”) financial condition and the future of its business, leading to inflated stock prices in violation of §§ 10(b), co

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. Montgomery County (“the County”); Isiah Leggett, the County Executive; and Patrick Lacefield, the Director of the County’s Office of Public Information (“OPI”), challenge a declaratory judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County ruling that they acted without authority and contrary to law by using

303 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2004) Darnell HOLOPIREK, Plaintiff, v. KENNEDY AND COE, LLC, Defendant. No. 02-2644-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 23, 2004. *1227 John L. Hampton, Gilliland & Hayes, P.A., Lawrence, KS, for Plaintiff. Katherine R. Sehoofs, Rebecca L. McGinnis, Lathrop & Gage, LC, Kansas

*1277MEMORANDUM OPINION This document relates to both tracks R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1. Introduction This case is before the court on five Motions to Dismiss (e.g., Docs. #208, 210, 211, 212, 213, Case No. 2:12-cv-02169-RDP) that have been filed by nine of the thirty-eigh

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NOS. 84, 86-87) CASE TO REMAIN OPEN Michael J. Seng, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs Edward Wa

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA” or “Act”), 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West Supp.1997), requires employers to pay compensation to certain maritime workers for disabling injuries resulting from their employment. An exception from total liability is provided to employers under § 8(f) of the LHWCA when the employer proves, among o

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge, (concurring) . I concur in the result reached by the majority, but I do not join in the opinion. The district court dismissed the complaint on abstention principles. The majority affirms on res judicata, what they describe as “a ground other than that relied upon by the district court.” I am not persuaded that the abstention d

Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Her-nández Denton, a la cual se une la Juez Asociada Se-ñora Naveira de Rodón. La opinión per curiam nos obliga a continuar disin-tiendo en estos casos en los que el Tribunal cierra las puer-tas a un sector de nuestra población que invoca nuestra Constitución en busca de un remedio contra el discrimen que sufre diariamente p

HODGES, Chief Justice. We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision affirming a district court’s judgment holding the petitioner, the Colorado National Bank of Denver (the Bank), liable for the face amounts of three letters of credit it issued to secure the completion of road improvements by its customer, the Woodmoor Corporation (Woodmoor). Board of County Commissioners of Routt County v. The Colorado Nati