Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Sunflower Electric Power Corporation v. FERC”
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company v. FERCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 14, 2021 Decided August 27, 2021 No. 20-1062 OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT CPV KEENAN II RENEWABLE ENERGY COMPANY, LLC, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 20-1101
City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri v. FERCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 2, 2025 Decided August 11, 2026 No. 24-1270 CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 24-1282, 24-1283
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellees have filed a motion for rehearing which calls attention to the fact that we did not, in our opinion, address the change of law which took place while the case was pending in our court.1 They cite Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711, 94 S.Ct. 2006, 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1973), and Adolph Coors Co. v. A & S Wholesalers, Inc., 561 F.2d 807, 809 (
603 F.2d 791 1979-1 Trade Cases 62,678 SUNFLOWER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The KANSAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, Central Kansas PowerCompany, Central Telephone & UtilitiesCorporation, and UnitedTelecommunications, Inc.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 78-1188. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit.
WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Until recently, incumbent public utilities were free to include in their tariffs and agreements “the option to construct any new transmission facilities in their particular service areas, even if the proposal for new construction came from a third party.” S.C. Pub. Serv. Auth. v. FERC (South Carolina), 762 F.3d 41, 72 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (
Alliant Energy v. Nebraska Public Power Districtpublic domain
SMITH, Circuit Judge. Members of the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (“MAPP”) and the Western Area Power Administration (“WAPA”) sued the Nebraska Public Power District (“NPPD”) for breach of contract. NPPD-also a MAPP member-collected fees from its customers under a special provision of the MAPP contract (the “Restated Agreement”). Other MAPP members collected similar charges f
Alliant Energy v. Nebraska Public Power Districtpublic domain
347 F.3d 1046 ALLIANT ENERGY; Aquila Power; Basin Electric Power Cooperative; British Columbia Hydropower Exchange; Citizen Power Sales, LLC; Dairyland Power Cooperative; GYNSYS Energy; Great River Energy; Kansas City Power & Light Company; Lincoln Electric System; Mid American Energy Company; Minnesota Municipal Power Agency; Minnesota Power, Inc.; Minnkota Power Cooperative; Northern States Power Company; Omaha Public Power District; Otter Ta
Sierra Club v. Kansas Corporation Comm'npublic domain
No. 128,510 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS SIERRA CLUB and VOTE SOLAR, Appellees/Cross-appellants, v. KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION and CITIZENS' UTILITY RATEPAYER BOARD, Appellees/Cross-appellees,
29 Kan. App.2d 1031 (2001) 37 P.3d 640 FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., and VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, Appellants, v. KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION, Appellee. UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, CARGILL, INC., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, and PROCTER & GAMBLE MANFACTURING, INC., (The Kansas Industrial Consumers), Appellants, v. KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
24 Kan. App.2d 42 (1997) 941 P.2d 390 KANSAS PIPELINE PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner/Appellant, v. THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, Respondent/Appellee, and WESTERN RESOURCES, INC., WILLIAMS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, and CITIZENS UTILITY RATEPAYER BOARD, Intervenors/Appellees. No. 78,523. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed June 20, 199
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Megan Racine Associates, Inc. (In Re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.)public domain
180 B.R. 375 (1995) In re MEGAN-RACINE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MEGAN RACINE ASSOCIATES, INC. and The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for the New Bank of New England, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 92-00860. Adv. No. 94-70113. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York. March 24, 1995.
City of Chanute v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.public domain
564 F.Supp. 1416 (1983) CITY OF CHANUTE, City of Iola, and City of Fredonia, Plaintiffs, v. KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant. No. 83 1104. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 1, 1983. Charles Apt, Glaves, Weil & Evans, Wichita, Kan. and Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., Don Charles Uthus, Peter A. Goldsmith, Wheatley & Wollesen, Washington, D.C.,
777 F.Supp.2d 44 (2011) SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Rural Utilities Service, et al., Defendants, and Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor. Civ. Action No. 07-01860(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 29, 2011. *46 David S. Baron, Earthju
ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. This case involves a "Renewable Energy Purchase Agreement" ("REPA") that resulted from arms-length bargaining between parties with longstanding experience and expertise in the generation and marketing of electrical energy. Smoky Hills Wind Project II, LLC ("Smoky II"), operates a wind farm generating wind energy which it supplies to various customers, known in
682 F.Supp. 291 (1988) REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH GAS SERVICES, INC., Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 87-0446-R. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. March 16, 1988. *292 Thomas G. Slater, R. Noel Clinard, Mic
10 Kan. App. 2d 527 (1985) 704 P.2d 989 MAPCO INTRASTATE PIPELINE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS and its members, MICHAEL LENNEN, KEITH R. HENLEY, RICHARD C. (PETE) LOUX, and his successor in office, MARGALEE WRIGHT, members of the State Corporation Commission and their successors in office, if any, Appellees. No. 58,201 Cour
Resources Investment Corp. v. Enron Corp.public domain
669 F.Supp. 1038 (1987) RESOURCES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, Resource Capital Corporation, a Colorado corporation, and Energy Management Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ENRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and Northern Natural Gas Company, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 87-K-678. United States District Court, D. Colorado.
746 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2009) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. No. C 06-4884 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 28, 2009. *1058 Matthew Ellis Bostick, Farella Braun Martel, Lisa T. Belenky, San Francisco,
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS