Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1560 Doc: 133 Filed: 07/23/2026 Pg: 1 of 86 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1560 BADAR KHAN SURI, Petitioner - Appellee, v. DONALD TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. *606 Plaintiffs participated in a Trump for President campaign rally in Louisville in March 2016 ... with the purpose of protesting. Perceived to be disruptive, they were unceremoniously ushered out after then-candidate Donald J. Trump said, "Get 'em out of here." Pl

B. Hack of the DNC's Email Systems Plaintiffs allege that [o]n one or more occasions before the summer of 2016, computer hackers working on behalf of the Russian government hacked into the email systems of the DNC in the District of Columbia and obtained voluminous amounts of data, including emails and other documents sent to and from thousands of individuals. Some of those individuals were staff m

Henry E. Hudson, Senior United States District Judge I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs1 in this case seek damages for injuries resulting from the unauthorized publication of their personal information *655on the internet. Plaintiffs allege that their information was illegally obtained by Ru

25-1019; 25-1113 Öztürk v. Hyde; Mahdawi v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 19th day of September, two thousand twenty-five. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,

Opinion issued April 18, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00308-CV ——————————— ANNE MORELAND DORAI, Appellant V. SURI DORAI, Appellee

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0249p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN RE: DONALD J. TRUMP; DONALD J. TRUMP FOR ┐ PRESIDENT, INC., │

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1956 LUZ B. MELÉNDEZ COLÓN; MILTON RAMOS MELÉNDEZ Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. JULIO ROSADO SÁNCHEZ; SINDICATO DE ASEGURADORES PARA LA SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DE SEGUROS DE RESPONSABILIDAD PROFESIONAL MEDICO HOSPITALARIA (SIMED) Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL

Justice THOMAS, dissenting. The Court correctly declines to affirm the Ninth Circuit's decision upholding the District Court's disgorgement order, but I disagree with the Court's decision to vacate and remand for the lower courts to "limi[t]" the disgorgement award. Ante, at 1940 -1941. Disgorgement can never be awarded under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5). That statute authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to see

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 406–446 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 14, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 25-2162 & 25-2357 MAHMOUD KHALIL v. PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Appellants (D.N.J. No. 2:25-cv-01963) ________________ SUR PETITION FOR R

Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge This case originated as a challenge to North Carolina's Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, 2016 N.C. Sess. Laws 3, commonly known as House Bill 2 ("HB2"), which required, among other things, that public agencies ensure that multiple occupancy restroom

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

FILED SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE RICHARD WILKINSON, ) No. 40061-1-III

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 656–747 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. In this case, we consider whether the district court correctly entered summary judgment dismissing Harvey Wolinetz’s fraud-related claims against Berkshire Life Insurance Company on statute of limitations grounds. Because we conclude that the date on which Wolinetz learned or should have learned of his claims against Berkshire presents a jury question, we vaca

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 680–778 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., Appellants, v. CASE NO. 1D15-4197 ANDY R. ALLEN SR., as Personal Representative for the Estate of PATRICIA L. ALLEN, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed October 18, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A.

WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, United States District Judge: Defendants Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. and Fox News Network LLC ("Fox"), Dianne Brandi, Irena Briganti, and Charles Payne move to dismiss the Amended Complaint ("Complaint") for failure to state a claim. For the reasons that follow, Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND The allegations of the Complaint ar

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TUALATIN VALLEY BUILDERS  SUPPLY, INC., No. 05-36173 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-04-01581-HA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States