Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Scott Turner (“Plaintiff’), who is proceeding pro se, filed suit against Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General, and the Office of the Comptroller of Currency, requesting a declaratory judgment that the Texas non judicial foreclosure statute, TEX. PROP. COD

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs are two same-sex couples who seek to marry in Texas or to have their marriage in another state recognized in Texas. They sued the state defendants seeking (1) a declaration that Texas’s law denying same-sex couples the right to marry, set forth in Article I, § 32 of the Texas Constitution and, inter alia, Texas Fami

Syllabus by the Court 1. Following an evidentiary hearing on a child custody modification motion, the trial court must make specific findings of fact on the factors set down in Minn.Stat. § 518.18 (1990) (grounds for modification) and Minn.Stat. § 518.17 (1990) ("best interests of child" factors) regardless of whether the motion is granted or denied. 2. If the trial court denies

OWEN, Circuit Judge: This suit was filed in state court on behalf of children who suffered neurological damage allegedly caused by vaccines containing Thimerosal that in turn contained mercury. The case was removed to federal district court. That court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to remand and then dismissed all claims against all defendants, relying on the National Childhood

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *195AND ORDER1 SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION New York City and forty-two New York counties have brought suit against numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and subsidiaries alleging Medicaid fraud in violation of the federal Best Prices Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Defendants, formerly manufacturers of DES for use in pregnancy have moved for summary judgment on the claims of plaintiff Lynn Yarnall. They contend that Yarnall’s claims are time-barred under the New York statute of limitations. Defendants’ motion is denied. Yarnall was born in New York in 19

192 Mich. App. 724 (1992) 482 N.W.2d 197 MOLL v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES Docket Nos. 115542, 115550. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided February 3, 1992, at 9:25 A.M. Barr & Arsenault (by Charles J. Barr and Bodo Schimers), for the plaintiffs. Schureman, Frakes, Glass & Wulfmeier (by Cheryl Chandler</

895 F.Supp. 530 (1995) Ellen BRAUNE, Juli Ann Harnett, Elizabeth Rougny, and Kathryn Sullivan Lincoln, Plaintiffs, v. The ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Burroughs-Wellcome & Co., Inc., Carnrick Laboratories, Inc., Chase Chemical Co., Chromally American Corporation, Dart Industries, Inc., p/k/a Rexall Drug Co., Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., Kremers-Urban Co., n/k/a Mequon Co., Lincoln Laboratories, Inc., Mallincrodt Inc., M

AMENDED ORDER * XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge and ORLANDO L. GARCIA, District Judge: This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ claims against the plan for the United States House of Representatives (“congressional plan” or “Plan C185”) enacted by the Texas Legislature in 2011, following a full trial on the claims.1 Plaintiffs mount both statewide claims

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. ' THE COURT’S PRIOR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, ISSUED ON NOVEMBER 8, 2011, IS WITHDRAWN. THIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IS ISSUED IN ITS PLACE. Pending before the Court is Defendant Abbott Laboratories’ (“Defendant” or “Abbott”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a. Claim. (Doc. No. 16.) After considering the par

971 A.2d 989 (2009) 199 N.J. 140 Raymond Arthur ABBOTT, a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Frances ABBOTT; Arlene Figueroa, Frances Figueroa, Hector Figueroa, Orlando Figueroa and Vivian Figueroa, minors, by their Guardian Ad Litem, Blanca Figueroa; Michael Hadley, a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Lola Moore; Henry Stevens, Jr., a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Henry Stevens, Sr.; Caroline James and Jermaine James, minors, by

Case: 20-50407 Document: 00515602091 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 14, 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VITALIANO, District Judge. . On September 10, 2012, Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in which she recommended that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted, dismissing all claims brought in this action by plaintiff Laura Anne Bezuidenhout. On October 4, 2012, plaintiff made timely objections to the R & R. After c

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 47 Docket No. DC-0752-12-0366-I-1 Mary A. Abbott, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 47 Docket No. DC-0752-12-0366-I-1 Mary A. Abbott, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUSAN LATTA; TRACI EHLERS; LORI No. 14-35420 WATSEN; SHARENE WATSEN; SHELIA ROBERTSON; ANDREA D.C. No. ALTMAYER; AMBER BEIERLE; 1:13-cv-00482- RACHAEL ROBERTSON, CWD Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. C. L. OTTER, “Butch”; Governor of the State of Idaho, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appel

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-12-0502-CR ________________________ Lisa Marie Fletcher, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

MEMORANDUM ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY MATTERS MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is an antitrust case. On March 3, 2008, Ethypharm S.A. France (“Ethypharm”) filed this action against Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”).1 Both parties are manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs and compete in the development and manufact