Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00217-CR ___________________________ ROGER EUGENE FAIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1023944D Before Gabriel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Nos. 23-35595 SUSAN SOTO PALMER; ALBERTO 24-1602 MACIAS; FABIOLA LOPEZ; CATY PADILLA; HELIDORA MORFIN, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05035- Plaintiffs - Appellees, RSL v.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 12, 2000 Session CLIFTON DEAN FAIN v. SUSAN LORRAINE FAIN Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 25074 Russ Heldman, Chancellor No. M1999-02261-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 29, 2000 In this post-divorce proceeding, Clifton Dean Fain (“Father”) filed a petiti

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00412-CR ROGER EUGENE FAIN APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-002-CR ROGER EUGENE FAIN A/K/A APPELLANT ROGER EUGENE FAIN, JR.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-002-CR ROGER EUGENE FAIN A/K/A APPELLANT ROGER EUGENE FAIN, JR. V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT C

02-10-412-CR

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Planet Ford, Inc., and Raj Grandhi appeal from a judgment, following a jury trial, rendered against them and in favor of plaintiffs-appellees *Page 2 Sarah and Ali Anousheh. Planet Ford and Grandhi raise numerous arguments regarding the judgment. Specifically, they contend that the trial court committed error with regard to jury instructions.

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant John E. Gearhart, Jr. appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a no-contest plea, for Aggravated Menacing, a first-degree misdemeanor. Gearhart contends that the trial court failed to comply with the *Page 2 requirements of Crim. R. 11, when taking his no-contest plea, which was accompanied by protestations of innocence. He also cont

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Darrell W. Sears appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a jury trial, for the offense of Theft, in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(2), by obtaining control over the property of Victor Parham, Sr., in the form of money, beyond the scope of Parham's consent. Sears contends that the evidence in *Page 2

Froelich, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellee Robert P. Dillaplain, M.D., was sued in 2005 for malpractice by Jeffrey T. Coleman Jr. and others, in the Greene County Common Pleas Court. Greene C.P. No. 2005 CV 381. The alleged malpractice arose, generally, from obstetrical care occurring in 1993 and 1994. Appellant, the Medical Assurance Company, Inc., proceeded to defend Dillaplain under a reservation of rights but in August 2007 filed a

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 142 OPINION {¶ 1} Nina Marshall Cooke, Administrator for the Estate of Nathan D. Marshall, appeals from trial court judgments dismissing claims against the following defendants: (1) Charles Curran, Don Lucas, and Vicki Pegg, as the Board of

796 F.Supp. 925 (1992) NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff, v. ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INS. CO. OF WINTERTHUR, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-0344-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. May 15, 1992. *926 W. Fain Rutherford, Phillip D. Payne, IV, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Va.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 664 Appellant Constance L. Ross appeals from the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court's judgment entry granting the appellees' motion for summary judgment. Ross advances three assignments of error. First, she contends that the trial court erred by finding the appellees immune from liability pursuant to Ohio's "

796 F.Supp. 929 (1992) NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff, v. ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INS. CO. OF WINTERTHUR, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-0344-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. May 15, 1992. *930 W. Fain Rutherford, Phillip D. Payne, IV, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Va.

[Cite as Davis v. Davis, 2014-Ohio-4957.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAMES E. DAVIS, III : : Appellate Case No. 26200 Plaintiff-Appellant : : Trial Court Case No. 2013-CV-1866 v.

[Cite as Discover Bank v. Swartz, 2016-Ohio-2751.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISCOVER BANK : : Appellate Case No. 26910 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 2

[Cite as State v. Benavides, 2014-Ohio-2089.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 2013-CA-42 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court No. 2013-TRD