⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Susan S. Staples”

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012-12-11 · Published · cited 74× · 58 A.3d 1083; 2012 ME 135; 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1446; 2012 WL 6124120; 2012 Me. LEXIS 135; 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1293
LEVY, J., with whom MEAD and GORMAN, JJ., join, concurring in part and dissenting in part. [¶ 36] I concur that the summary judgment awarded to Staples should be vacated, but I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion’s conclusion that Fuhrm-ann cannot maintain suit against her individual supervisors. Fuhrmann can sue her individual supervisors because (A) the Maine Hu
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-06-21 · Published · cited 8× · 181 F.3d 943; 1999 WL 404694; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13628
*944 RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Susan Elaine Rose appeals the denial of her application for social-security disability benefits. The District Court 2 upheld the decision of the Commissioner, and we affirm. I. <
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REHEARING Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 28 2018, 10:44 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-07-06 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jul 06 2018, 8:39 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994-07-21 · Published · cited 1× · 30 F.3d 108; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18234; 1994 WL 378672
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Staples v. United States, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994), the court recalls its mandate and vacates its judgment. The judgment of conviction entered by the district court is also vacated. The appellant has consistently c
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued June 27, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00815-CV ——————————— SUSAN CARR, Appellant V. DIANA CLAUDIO, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992-08-03 · Published · cited 10× · 971 F.2d 608; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17635; 1992 WL 181204
971 F.2d 608 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Harold E. STAPLES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-5033. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Aug. 3, 1992. Susan W. Pennington, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Tony M. Graham, U.S. Atty. and Neal B. Kirkpatrick, Asst. U.S. Atty., with her on the brief), for
Baden v. Staplespublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 1978-10-24 · Published · cited 25× · 45 N.Y.2d 889; 410 N.Y.S.2d 808; 383 N.E.2d 110; 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2312
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The issue is whether Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111) should be overruled. The issue is not new for the court; it has been raised with frequency in the 12 years since the Seider case was first decided (see Donawitz v Danek, 42 NY2d 138; Neuman v Dunham, 39 NY2d 999; Simpson v Loehmann, 21 NY2d 305, mot for rearg den 21 NY2
Prince George County Circuit Court · 2010-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 81 Va. Cir. 308; 2010 Va. Cir. LEXIS 284
By Judge W. Allan Sharrett This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss and on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The Court heard argument by counsel on August 4, 2010, and requested further written argument on the legal issues presented. Having considered the arguments and all applicable law, the Court, for the following reasons, denies Defendant’s motion to dismiss, grants Defendant’s m
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 16, 2005 Session SUSAN DIANE JONES v. STEVEN TRAVIS DORROUGH, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 2-214-03 Wheeler A. Rosenbalm, Judge No. E2003-02749-COA-R3-CV - FILED APRIL 26, 2005 This case arises out of a long-running dispute between Steven Travis Dorrough
State v. Hallumpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-04-05 · Published · cited 1× · 783 S.E.2d 294; 246 N.C. App. 658; 2016 WL 1319259; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 353
McCULLOUGH, Judge. Christopher Lynn Hallum ("defendant") appeals from judgments entered upon his convictions for obtaining property by false pretenses, possession of stolen goods, and attaining habitual felon status. For the following reasons, we find no error in part and reverse in part. I. Background Defendant was arrested at
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 24, 2013 Session GEORGE SMITH v. GENERAL TIRE AND EMILY ALEXANDER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 2010CV1407 C. L. Rogers, Judge No. M2012-01446-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 30, 2013 A man who was injured in a head-on collision filed suit against the woman driving
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 20, 2004 Session SUSAN GREEN v. LEON MOORE, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. I-2K393 R. E. Lee Davies, Judge No. M2003-01015-COA-RM-CV - Filed August 3, 2004 This appeal pertains to an alleged breach of a settlement
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 17, 2002 Session SUSAN DIANE JONES v. STEVEN TRAVIS DORROUGH ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-585-00 Wheeler A. Rosenbalm, Judge FILED OCTOBER 28, 2002 No. E2001-02397-COA-R3-CV The origin of this appeal wa
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 255 F. Supp. 3d 253; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89472
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, D.J. I. Introduction This ease concerns- the tragic death of Yogambigai Pasupathipillai (“Pasupathipil-lai”). On August 6, 2013, Pasupathipillai suffered a fatal accident while working at the Piantedosi bakery in Malden, Massachusetts. Compl. ¶ 9, ECF No. 1-1. Thiru Satchi (“Satchi”), as administrator of Pasu-pathipillai’s estate, brings this motion against R
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-12-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 7, 2003 Session SUSAN TAYLOR v. SQUARE D COMPANY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 43,748 Robert E. Corlew, III, Judge No. M2002-01620-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 30, 2003 Disobeying the direct orders of his supervisor, an electrician began work on
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017-10-11 · Published · cited 1× · 302 F. Supp. 3d 821
William O. Bertelsman, United States District Judge Introduction This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for unreasonable seizure and excessive force and for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S. § 12132. Plaintiffs, suing through their m
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 5, 2001 Session SUSAN J. HICKS v. CRESCENT RESOURCES, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. II-25632 Hon. Russ Heldman Judge No. M2001-00079-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 11, 2002 Plaintiff was granted summary judgment for commissions due and owing from
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-05-01 · Published · cited 12× · 942 F. Supp. 2d 432; 35 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1090; 2013 WL 1811877; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62364
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Phillip Leshinsky brought this action against Defendants Telvent GIT, *436S.A. (“Telvent GIT”), Telvent Farradyne, Inc. (“Farradyne”), Telvent Caseta, Inc. (“Caseta”), Glenn Deitiker, and Alfredo Escriba (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging whistleblower claims under Sectio
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-11-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 12, 2004 Session SUSAN SIMMONS, ET AL. v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000617-03 Robert Childers, Judge No. W2003-02643-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 24, 2004 Homeowner’s insurance policyho