Cases

NUMBER 13-12-00682-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ SUSANA FLORES, Appellant, v. RAMIRO FLORES, Appellee. __________________________________________

NUMBER 13-11-00309-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG SUSANA CHAVEZ AND RALPH RICHARD SAMUDIA, Appellants, v. HERACLIO ERIC FLORES, ET AL., Appellees. On appeal from the 93rd District Court

OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice This is an appeal from a divorce decree. The..trial court granted the parties a divorce on. the basis of, insupportability, divided the community property, and ordered the husband to pay child .support. On appeal, the wife complains of the trial court’s failure to grant her a divorce on grounds of cruelty and cha

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-25-00095-CV ———————————— Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Appellant v. Susana Lopez, Appellee

MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (establishing time and numerical limits for motions to reopen); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accord

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants are twenty graduates from medical schools outside of the United States who are ineligible to receive a medical license in Puerto Rico because they failed the Puerto Rico Medical Licensing Examination (the “PRMLE”). They challenge the validity of the PRMLE’s purportedly arbitrary passing score via this 42 .U.S.C. § 1983 action, allegi

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Ricardo Velásquez, Susana D. Grana-dos-Urizar, and Eluvia Rosalina Grana-dos-Urizar (collectively “petitioners”) seek review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board” or “BIA”) denying their application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We affirm the Board’s decision. I. Petitioners

342 F.3d 55 Ricardo F. VELÁSQUEZ, Susana D. Granados-Urizar, Eluvia R. Granados-Urizar, Petitioners,v.John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 01-1741. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard April 1, 2002. Decided August 29, 2003. Randy Olen,

LYNCH, Chief Judge. These two appeals arise out of similar lawsuits in which plaintiffs, current and previous employees of the Puerto Rico State Insurance Fund Corporation (SIFC), have alleged that defendants, the SIFC and its high-level administrators, selectively enforced Puerto Rico’s merit principle against them. This “selective enforcement” is said to be in violation of the

OPINION AND ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Vinicio Medrano Díaz has filed before the court a Petition against Bankruptcy Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte, requesting that he be ordered to be recused from further bankruptcy proceedings and further requesting that the District Court discipline him. I. BACKGROUND The instant petition is but an additional chapter to an eight

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. HOYT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the defendant, International Finance Corporation’s (“IFC”), motion to dismiss the plaintiffs, Enterasys Networks, Inc. (“Enterasys”), Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on immunity pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim pursu

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Certiorari SAMUEL SILVA RAMÍREZ procedente del Tribunal de Peticionario Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de

DYK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs appeal from a district court order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related state law claims. We affirm the district court’s dismissal. The district court found that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 17, 2025 Decided June 24, 2025 No. 24-7053 METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY OF LIMA, APPELLANT v. RUTAS DE LIMA S.A.C., APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cv-02155)

Rivera Martínez, Juez Ponente *840TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA El 14 de enero de 2004, la Universidad de Puerto Rico presentó ante nos solicitud de certiorari. Mediante la misma, solicita la revisión de la resolución dictada el 21 de octubre de 2003, por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan, en el caso Susana J.

596 F.3d 1 (2010) PLEASURES OF SAN PATRICIO, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, Iván R. Rocafort, Plaintiff, v. Juan C. MÉNDEZ-TORRES; Departamento De Hacienda De Puerto Rico, Defendants, Appellees. No. 08-2388. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 4, 2009. Decided February 22, 2010. *3 Fran

LYNCH, Chief Judge. At issue is when a facial Takings Clause claim attacking a statute and regulations accrues for statute of limitations purposes. The district court concluded that the claim here was untimely. Asociación de Suscripción Conjunta del Seguro de Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Juarbe-Jiménez, 720 F.Supp.2d 152 (D.P.R.2010). We agree and affirm the dismissal of this case. I.

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Ricardo Velásquez, Susana D. Grana-dos-Urizar, and Eluvia Rosalina Grana-dos-Urizar (collectively “petitioners”) seek review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board” or “BIA”) denying their application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We affirm the Board’s decision. I. Petitioners, a father and his two adult daughters, are natives and c

BESOSA, District Judge. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) adopted and affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Kettly Prosper’s claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Ms. Prosper, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions this court for a review of the BIA’

DiCLERICO, District Judge. Angelina Ruiz-Rosa brought suit against officials of the Puerto Rico prison system and prison medical personnel after her eighteen-year-old son, Jose Luis Ma-chuca-Ruiz, died of septicemia while being detained at the Bayamón 1072 Correctional Complex (“BCC”). In her amended complaint, Ruiz alleged violations of the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendme