⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Sweet v. Austin”

Sweet v. Austinpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996-04-18 · Published · cited 7× · 226 A.D.2d 942; 641 N.Y.S.2d 165; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3929
Cardona, P. J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Keniry, J.), entered April 3, 1995 in Fulton County, which granted motions by defendants Ruperto S. Young and St. Mary’s Hospital at Amsterdam for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. On April 15, 1985, plaintiff Louise R. Sweet (hereinafter plaintiff) came under the care of defendant Paul Austin, an ophthalmologis
Sweet v. Austinpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962-03-21 · Published · cited 10× · 179 A.2d 302; 158 Me. 90; 1962 Me. LEXIS 11
179 A.2d 302 (1962) Charlotte SWEET pro aml v. Robert F. AUSTIN, d/b/a Austin's Gulf Service. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. March 21, 1962. *303 Peter N. Kyros, Portland, Robert J. Melnick, Biddeford, for plaintiff. John D. Leddy, Richard D. Hewes, Portland, for defendant. Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, SULLIVAN, D
Abel v. Austinpublic domain
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2013-10-24 · Published · cited 41× · 411 S.W.3d 728; 2013 WL 5763071; 2013 Ky. LEXIS 458
Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. Each of the Appellants in this action was a plaintiff in a lawsuit brought in the Boone Circuit Court,1 Boone County, Kentucky, against American Home Products, the company that marketed the anti-obesity drug combination commonly known as “Fen-Phen.” As further explained below, Appellants’ claims in that case were transferred from the Boone
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2014-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00363-CV Dr. Eddie Johnson, Appellant v. David G. Sweet, DDS, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 258-288-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2014-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2014 NO. 03-13-00363-CV Dr. Eddie Johnson, Appellant v. David G. Sweet, DDS, Appellee APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016-04-22 · Published · cited 13× · 2016 VT 45; 202 Vt. 155; 146 A.3d 882; 2016 WL 1613950; 2016 Vt. LEXIS 46
*158Robinson, J. ¶ 1. Defendant Dylan Stinson appeals from a judgment finding him liable to plaintiffs Kevin and Linda Flanagan for damage to their vacation home from a fire started in an outdoor fireplace on their deck by a group of teenagers who were there without their permission. Stinson contends that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to find him liable for the dam
Sweet v. Austin Co.public domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934-04-04 · Published · cited 0× · 12 N.J. Misc. 381; 171 A. 684; 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 120
Bodine, J. Prosecutor seeks the review of an award of compensation under the Workmen's Compensation act. Two questions are presented and there is no merit in either. Pirst, the proofs sustain the bureau finding that the contract of employment was made in this state, and that although the work was to be performed in another state still our statute was controlling. Since compensation under section 11 of the statu
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-12-22 · Published · cited 83× · 665 F.3d 671; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25837; 2011 WL 6413960
665 F.3d 671 (2011) INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SWEET LITTLE MEXICO CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-40449. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 22, 2011. *672 Mary Searcy Marrero, Rachel J. Stroud, Stroud & Welch, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-11-05 · Published · cited 6× · 121 F.4th 32
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THERESA SWEET; CHENELLE No. 23-15049 ARCHIBALD; DANIEL DEEGAN; SAMUEL HOOD; TRESA D.C. No. 3:19-cv- APODACA; ALICIA DAVIS; 03674-WHA JESSICA JACOBSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC., Intervenor-Appellant,
Austin v. Fordpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1998-08-19 · Published · cited 4× · 181 F.R.D. 283; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13126; 1998 WL 540978
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff Gwendolyn 0. Austin (“Austin”) and Defendants Gerard W. and Eileen 0. Ford, as Trustees, and Ford Models, Inc. (“Ford Models” and collectively, the “Defendants”) have jointly moved pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to vacate the judgment of the Court in Austin v. Ford, No. 95 Civ. 3730,1998 WL 88744 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 19
Joseph v. Sweetpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000-12-18 · Published · cited 5× · 125 F. Supp. 2d 573; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19022; 2000 WL 1910613
125 F.Supp.2d 573 (2000) Edward A. JOSEPH, individually and on behalf of the Estate of his father, Nassef Joseph, and Marc Oddo, individually and on behalf of the Estate of his father, Nicholos Oddo, Plaintiffs, v. William H. SWEET, M.D. and Massachusetts General Hospital, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 00-11026-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 18, 2000.</
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 6, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00458-CV SHANE LANGSTON, Appellant V. FREESE & GOSS, PLLC, RICHARD A. FREESE, TIM K. GOSS, SHEILA M. BOSSIER, DENNIS C. SWEET, AND SWEET & FREESE, PLLC, Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2024-06-26 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00202-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF JEFFREY WAYNE MAYNARD AND TIFFINI SWEET MAYNARD On Appeal from the 47th District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 79774-A, Honora
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2025-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-01100-COA AUSTIN WIGLEY A/K/A AUSTIN Z. WIGLEY APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/07/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TONI DEMETRESSE TERRETT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WARREN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 4, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID STEVEN AUSTIN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County No. 6256 J. Weber McCraw, Judge No. W2011-00031-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 27, 2011 The defendant, David Steven Austin, was convicted by a Fayette County Circuit Court jury of
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2012-03-22 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-11-00421-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG STEVEN LYNN DODD A/K/A SWEET A/K/A STEVEN LYNN DODD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 252nd District Court
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952-08-08 · Published · cited 4× · 106 F. Supp. 634; 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4064
106 F.Supp. 634 (1952) UNITED STATES v. SWEET. Civ. A. No. 8879. United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D. August 8, 1952. Philip A. Hart, U. S. Atty., J. Connor Austin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., Harry Kobel, U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Detroit, Mich., of counsel, for plaintiff. Ernest Goodman, Detroit, Mich., for defendant
District Court, W.D. Texas · 1998-06-16 · Published · cited 2× · 8 F. Supp. 2d 886; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9377; 1998 WL 347146
8 F.Supp.2d 886 (1998) Alan HAMILTON and Robert Barnhart, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF AUSTIN, Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, Department of the Interior; and Jamie Rappaport Clark, Director of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Defendants. No. A 98 CA 317 SS. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. June 16, 1998. *887
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998-11-16 · Published · cited 2× · 167 F.3d 887
161 F.3d 271 130 Ed. Law Rep. 1078 Ted MEYER, Individually and as Next Friend for CarolynPreciado, A Minor; Rosemary Meyer, Individually and as NextFriend for Carolyn Preciado, A Minor; Harold Robbins,Individually and as Next Friend for Linda Rosales, now knownas Linda Quiroz, A Minor; Linda Robbins, Individually andas Next Friend for Linda Rosales, now known as Linda Quiroz,A Minor; Pedro R.
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977-04-29 · Published · cited 1× · 255 N.W.2d 224; 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1520
Syllabus by the Court An insured's automobile was not a "newly acquired" replacement vehicle within the terms of his insurance policy when it had not been acquired to replace the vehicle described in the policy. Plaintiffs appeal from a declaratory judgment of the Kanabec County District Court holding that an insurance policy issued by defendant insurance company provides no liability coverage for claims arising out of the accident that generated this