Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sweet v. Cardona”
Baker v. Sweet Associates, Inc.public domain
Cardona, P. J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Marinelli, J.), entered June 14, 1999 in Albany County, which denied third-party plaintiffs motion to, inter alia, set aside the verdict, and (2) from that part of a judgment of said court, entered January 11, 2000 in Albany County, upon a verdict rendered in favor of third-party defendant against third-party plaintiff. In October 1995, defe
Sweet v. Austinpublic domain
Cardona, P. J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Keniry, J.), entered April 3, 1995 in Fulton County, which granted motions by defendants Ruperto S. Young and St. Mary’s Hospital at Amsterdam for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. On April 15, 1985, plaintiff Louise R. Sweet (hereinafter plaintiff) came under the care of defendant Paul Austin, an ophthalmologis
America First Legal Foundation v. Cardonapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-1947-RCL MIGUEL CARDONA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case concerns the decision of the United States Department of Education (“the Department”) to create a group known as the N
Theresa Sweet v. Everglades College, Incpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THERESA SWEET; CHENELLE No. 23-15049 ARCHIBALD; DANIEL DEEGAN; SAMUEL HOOD; TRESA D.C. No. 3:19-cv- APODACA; ALICIA DAVIS; 03674-WHA JESSICA JACOBSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC., Intervenor-Appellant,
Sweet v. Packaging Corp.public domain
—Crew III, J. Defendant Packaging Corporation of America, Tenneco Packaging, formerly known as Packaging Corporation of America, contracted with defendant Monahan-Loughlin Inc. to replace the roof of a building owned by it. Monahan-Loughlin, in turn, subcontracted with A Plus Environmental Services, plaintiffs employer, for the removal of asbestos roofing material from the building, which entailed, inter alia, cutting the roof i
Iveson v. Sweet Associates, Inc.public domain
White, J. Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (Cardona, J.), entered December 14, 1992 in Albany County, which granted a cross motion by defendant STS Steel, Inc. for summary judgment partially dismissing plaintiffs’ second cause of action against it. In 1987, defendant Sweet Associates, Inc., the prime general construction contractor for a renovation project being undertaken in the State Educ
Sweet v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancepublic domain
White, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Harris, J.), entered August 15, 1994 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. *842Robert Wein sustained serious personal injuries in an automobile accident that occurred on July 4, 1987 in the Town of Brunswick, Rensselaer County, when his vehicle was
Mikoll, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dawson, J.), entered August 6, 1997 in Clinton County, which, inter alia, partially granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration between the parties. This appeal deals with a disagreement between respondent Sweet Associates, Inc. (hereinafter respondent), a masonry contractor, and petitioner, a school district. The partie
Cardona v. Porto Ricopublic domain
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon thé authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.
People v. Fajardo Cardonapublic domain
HamiltoN, Judge, delivered tbe following opinion: By bis petition filed in tbis court October 25, 1915, which is tbe basis of tbe proceedings in tbis court, Mateo Fajardo Oardona alleges that be is deprived of tbe civil rights guaranteed him by tbe 6th Amendment of tbe Constitution, which reads as follows: “In all criminal prosecutions, tbe accused shall enjoy tbe right to a speedy and public trial, by an impar
In re Cardonapublic domain
HAMILTON, Judge, filed the following opinion: Before determining the exact issue before the court,’.it will be well to establish some general principles. 1. The right to habeas corpus established in statute 31 of Charles II. (1679) secures to every American, as to every Briton, the right to have the cause of his detention examined and determined by a court of justice. If, upon such examination,
Ortiz Rivera v. Estado Libre Asociadopublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Ortiz emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El 11 de mayo de 1983 un grupo de cuarenta (40) familias constituidas por unas ciento sesenta y seis (166) personas residentes en la Urbanización Fajardo Gardens se unieron para presentar una demanda de daños y perjuicios por razón de las pérdidas y daños sufridos durante unas inundaciones acaecidas el 13 de mayo de 1982 y el 21 de abril de 1983.
People v. Correapublic domain
*811In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence {see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004];
People v. Ramrattanpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered January 4, 2012, convicting him of rape in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, perjury in the first degree (three counts), conspiracy in the fifth degree (two counts), tampering with a witness in the third degree, and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree (three counts), upon a
Cardona, PJ. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Rumsey, J.), entered April 26, 2007 in Broome County, which denied defendant Mark Tumminello’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him. In 2005, plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover sums owed by the corporate defendants for goods that were sold and delivered to them. As relevant herein, the goods were supplied pursuant to
Wahhab v. Fischerpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. A correction officer had cleared the count of the inmates in *997his unit and was preparing to call it into the watch commander when he n
Goldstein v. Jonespublic domain
Cardona, P.J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered April 5, 2005 in Ulster County, which, inter alia, partially granted plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, the owner of a parcel of land in the Town of Olive, Ulster County, commenced this RPAPL article 15 action seeking to establish her right to utilize a roadway consisting of three rights-of-way on three adjoining
SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. JERRELL GREENE-MARTIN Docket: 2284CR00723 Dates: February 6, 2024 Present:
Haden v. Selskypublic domain
*1057A prison mail clerk opened an envelope addressed to petitioner and discovered a $30 money order as well as a note from another inmate’s relative indicating that the money order was from that inmate. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating facility correspondence procedures and engaging in an unauthorized exchange. He was found guilty of these charges at the
Diaz v. Smithpublic domain
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. During a confidential investigation, an inmate disclosed that petitioner had given him marihuana in exchange for cigarettes and had threatened him when he was