Cases

*455OPINION OF THE COURT W. Dennis Duggan, J. The narrowly focused question in this case is whether the attorney for the respondent father should be sanctioned for her failure to attend a scheduled court appearance for which she had notice. However, a wider angle inquiry into this area illuminates the cavalier approach that a significant portion of th

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This is a medical malpractice case, brought in 1995, for the deaths of two *53 Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) patients in 1961. The plaintiffs sued the doctor and institutions responsible for treating their decedents, Eileen Sienkew-icz and George Heinrich, who suffered from

PER CURIAM. Appeal from District Court dismissed on stipulation of parties.

33 Wis.2d 49 (1966) DUGGAN, Executrix, Respondent, v. ARNOLD N. MAY BUILDERS, INC., Appellant. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. November 3, 1966. November 29, 1966. *51 For the appellant there was a brief by Morrissy, Morrissy, Sweet & Stowe of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Ralph R. Stowe. For the respondent t

199 Cal.App.2d 806 (1962) PACIFIC HILLS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOWELL H. DUGGAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. Civ. No. 19428. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One. Feb. 5, 1962. Wallace, Garrison, Norton & Ray for Plaintiff and Appellant. Robert J. Foley, Lawrence D. Saler and Richard L. Doutt for Defendants and

316 F.2d 735 Jerome DUGGAN, Trustee of Christopher Engineering Co., et al.v.UNITED STATES of America. No. 17296. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. April 25, 1963. Eugene M. Munger, St. Louis, Mo., for Jerome Duggan. Grove Sweet, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee.

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. This case arises out of the litigations stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”). Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2012, 41 actions relating to this underlying event are presently before this Court.

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. This case arises out of the litigations stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”). Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2012, 41 actions relating to this underlying event are presently before this Court.

OPINION & ORDER SWEET, District Judge. Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2 012, 41 actions stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook” or the “Company”) are presently before this Court. The cases include class actions against defendant Faceboo

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS BURROUGHS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Lisa Siegel Belanger and Devora C. Kaiser (“plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint in this action on February 12, 2015 [Docket No. 1]. The Complaint is 462 pages long and contains 2767 numbered paragraphs. Plaintiffs attached 393 separate exhibits to their Complaint, which were filed with the Court and served on the defen

639 F.Supp. 532 (1986) Sachiko T. BOWER, Plaintiff, v. Frederick R. WEISMAN, Frederick Weisman Co., and Rare Properties, Inc., Defendants. No. 85 Civ. 8916 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 30, 1986. *533 *534 Montclare & Guay, New York City, for plaintiff; Paul D. M

Thompson v M & M Forwarding of Buffalo, N.Y., Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 05875) Thompson v M & M Forwarding of Buffalo, N.Y., Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 05875 Decided on July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department

OPINION AND ORDER PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge. On July 12, 2011, John and Vita Collins (“Plaintiffs”) filed this purported class action, alleging violations of state and federal law in connection with the foreclosure of real property. The defendants are Ma-comb County Sheriff Anthony Wickers-ham, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (‘Wells Fargo”), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NASIR A. SHAH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3127 (TJK) VINAYAK SAXENA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Nasir Shah hired Vinayak Saxena to represent him in connection with a potential real-estate investment for Shah’s business. But Shah claims that the

20 A.3d 291 (2011) The STATE of New Hampshire v. Andrew FARRINGTON. No. 2009-617. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: January 6, 2011. Opinion Issued: February 23, 2011. *292 Michael A. Delaney, attorney general (Lucy H. Carrillo, assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State. Mer

917 A.2d 184 (2006) The STATE of New Hampshire v. Keith LACASSE. No. 2005-189. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: March 8, 2006. Opinion Issued: June 16, 2006. *185 Kelly A. Ayotte, attorney general (Simon R. Brown, senior assistant attorney general, on the memorandum of law and orally), for the State. <

931 A.2d 548 (2007) The STATE of New Hampshire v. Daniel SODOYER. No. 2006-541. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: June 7, 2007. Opinion Issued: August 24, 2007. *549 Kelly A. Ayotte, attorney general (Stephen D. Fuller, senior assistant attorney general, and Nicholas Cort, assistant attorney general, on the

SUMMARY ORDER Facebook, Inc., et al. appeal as interve-nors from the final judgment of the United States Distinct Court (Sweet, J.) approving a class action settlement in this securities case stemming from the initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook stock. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review. The appellants intervene to vindicate

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Robert Lowinger appeals from Judge Sweet’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The complaint asserted claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), against, inter alia, appellees Goldman Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (collectively “Lead Underwriters”). It sought to hold them liable under Section 16(b)

PER CURIAM: Appeal from two March 28, 2013 orders in related cases by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Deborah A. Batts, Judge). In these related cases, Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) allege violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The district court, in finding that the Moench presumption of prudence ap