Cases

796 S.W.2d 607 (1990) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Glennon Paul SWEET, Appellant. No. 70174. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. September 11, 1990. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 16, 1990. *610 Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for appellant. William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, A

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) moves to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the action is time-barred by the statute of limitations. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. The Parties NYSE is a New York corporation which operates as a securities exchange, providing a market for the trading of securities. Plainti

92 P.3d 492 (2004) 140 Idaho 242 Ralph E. SWORD, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joyce E. Sweet, Deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lawrence L. SWEET, Defendant-Appellant. No. 28199. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2004 Term. May 5, 2004. *495 Eismann Law Office, Caldwell, for appellant.

*1221Opinion PERLUSS, P. J. In our initial decision in this case (Viner v. Sweet (Sept. 28, 2001, B138149) [superseded by grant of review Dec. 19, 2001 (S101964)] (Viner I)), we held to establish causation in fact the plaintiffs in a transactional legal malpractice action are not required to prove the opposing side in contra

112 Cal.Rptr.2d 426 (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 730 Michael VINER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Charles A. SWEET et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B138149. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. September 28, 2001. Review Granted December 19, 2001. *427 Munger, Tolles &a;

SWEET, P.J., This matter is before the court on the prliminary objections of defendant, West Penn Power Company to plaintiffs’ *84complaint in trespass, on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction, and on the grounds that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. In March 1983, plaintiffs, Winfred A. Higgins, Jr. and Sheila M. Hig

333 A.2d 411 (1975) Ralph N. SWEET et al. v. HEMINGWAY TRANSPORT, INC. et al. No. 73-156-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. March 4, 1975. *412 Higgins & Slattery, John A. Baglini, Providence, for plaintiffs. Gunning, LaFazia, Gnys & Selya, Richard T. Linn, Providence, for Hemingway Transport, Inc. and Carl J.

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice, dissenting.. A subcontractor who has supplied labor and material in the construction of an improvement to real estate by virtue of a contract with a contractor “shall have, to secure payment, a lien” upon the improvement. Ark.Code Ann. § 18^4 — 101(a) (Repl.2003). SCI obtained a lien on the project. BCC then contested the lien and purchased from

118 F.Supp.2d 73 (2000) Evelyn HEINRICH on Behalf of her husband George HEINRICH, Henry M. Sienkewicz, Jr. on behalf of his mother Eileen Rose Sienkewicz,[1] Plaintiffs, v. William H. SWEET, M.D., Trustee of the Lee Edward Farr Trust dated 1/11/71, as amended,[2] The Estate of Lee Edward Farr,[2] M.D., Associated Universities, Inc.,[2] Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technolog

662 N.W.2d 387 (2003) 255 Mich. App. 83 HIGGINS LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and John Doering, John Smith, Mary Smith, William Sharp, Arlean Sharp, Gary W. Wilson, Jean Wilson, Timothy J. Pipkins, Doris Pipkins, John Wade, and Elizabeth Wade, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees, v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP, Roscommon County Road Commission, and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appelle

The evidence may be sufficient to sustain the judgment if the defendant was accorded a fair and impartial trial by the court and an unbiased jury. However, I cannot agree with the majority of the court that the juror Leo M. Martin was a competent juror under the facts as disclosed by the record. In my opinion the defendant's motion to quash the panel of jurors should have been sustained. It is shown by the record that prior to the witness Leo M. Martin being called as a juror in this c

The defendant, Cleve Sweet, was charged by information in the district court of Pittsburg county, Okla., on November 27, 1934, with the crime of murder, was tried, convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentenced to serve a term of four years' imprisonment in the State Penitentiary, and has appealed to this court. This case has been called for trial three times. The first trial, which was begun October 11, 1935, resulted in a hung jury. The second time this case was called

951 F.Supp. 352 (1997) CAPITAL DISTRICT PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN, Plaintiff, v. Michael O'HIGGINS, d/b/a Michael O'Higgins & Co., and David Oberting, Defendants. No. 94-CV-61. United States District Court, N.D. New York. January 16, 1997. *353 *354 Iseman, Cunningham, Riester & Hyde, Al

14 F.2d 758 (1924) SWEET v. LANG et al. District Court, D. Minnesota. April 2, 1924. Hugh V. Mercer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff. Cobb, Wheelwright, Hoke & Benson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Carl W. Lang and others. Boyesen, Otis & Brill, of St. Paul, Minn., for Northwestern Fuel Co. Geo. M. Bleecker, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Kunz Oil Co.

This was an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the alleged negligence of certain defendants in maintaining a telephone wire across the public highway. The petition alleges that the plaintiff was driving on the public highway in a covered wagon, and the defendants were maintaining their telephone wire across the public highway so low that it caught the top or cover on the wagon, thereby jerking the top and box of the wagon from the gears; the plaintiff

SUTIN, Judge (specially concurring). I concur in the result. A. Allegations of damage to the body and mind are general, not special, damages. The opinion does not meet the challenge of defendant. Defendant claims that Dr. Salazar’s testimony on clinical psychology was inadmissible because the complaint did not

DEICE, J. This is an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the occupants of respondent’s automobile and to said automobile by driving the same into an exposed and uncovered conduit or ditch in one of the streets of Salt Lake City, which ditch, it is alleged, was negligently left unprotected and unguarded by said city, appellant herein. We shall state the facts deemed necessary in connection- with the particular

WINTER, Circuit Judge: Appellant William J. Higgins, a member of the New York Stock Exchange (“Exchange”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his antitrust action against the Exchange as barred by the Clayton Act’s statute of limitations. 755 F.Supp. 113. Appellant argues, first, that his antitrust cause of action accrued only after the Securities and Exchange Commiss

TEIGEN, Judge. This action was commenced in Morton County to quiet title to land. The Morton County District Court'dismissed the action on motion made by several of the defendants, including Burleigh County, on the *792ground that it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter. The land is described in the complaint as "an island lying in the Missouri River with its sou

DUFFY, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant Higgins was charged with sale of heroin on October 28,1964 (Count 1); possession of heroin on that date (Count 2); sale of heroin on November 10, 1964 (Count 3) and possession of heroin on that date (Count 4). After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty on all counts and received a sentence