Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sylvia Dann”
US Bank v. Sternpublic domain
US Bank v Stern (2020 NY Slip Op 07624) US Bank v Stern 2020 NY Slip Op 07624 Decided on December 16, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
PNC Bank, NA v. Islampublic domain
PNC Bank, NA v Islam (2019 NY Slip Op 07303) PNC Bank, NA v Islam 2019 NY Slip Op 07303 Decided on October 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Humphreypublic domain
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Humphrey (2019 NY Slip Op 04445) U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Humphrey 2019 NY Slip Op 04445 Decided on June 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
People v. Melendezpublic domain
People v Melendez (2021 NY Slip Op 04497) People v Melendez 2021 NY Slip Op 04497 Decided on July 21, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Lamarrepublic domain
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Lamarre (2022 NY Slip Op 07056) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Lamarre 2022 NY Slip Op 07056 Decided on December 14, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea
Fid. Natl. Title Co. v. Carlsonpublic domain
[Cite as Fid. Natl. Title Co. v. Carlson, 2018-Ohio-4274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE : OPINION COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY : MERGER TO LAWYERS TITLE CASE NO. 2018-G-0156 INSURANCE
Torres v. Walkerpublic domain
356 F.3d 238 Ramon TORRES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Hans WALKER, Superintendent; Rual Ricci, Corrections Officer; E. Dann, Deputy Superintendent at Auburn Corr. Facility; Capt. Burns, Corrections Officer at Auburn Corr. Facility; Lt. Vasques, Corrections Officer at Auburn Corr. Facility; Lt. Chehovich, Hearing Officer at Auburn Corr. Facility; Sylvia Laguana, Acting Director of Inmates Grievance Program; Phillip Coombe, Jr., Acting Commissione
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Alipublic domain
Bank of Am., N.A. v Ali (2022 NY Slip Op 00838) Bank of Am., N.A. v Ali 2022 NY Slip Op 00838 Decided on February 9, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t
in Re James Legatepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00874-CV IN RE James LEGATE From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 10-05-00081-CVK Honorable Ron G. Carr, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Torres v. Walkerpublic domain
MINER, Circuit Judge. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2), caps awards of attorneys’ fees in prisoner civil rights actions that result in a “monetary judgment.” In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether this statutory cap on attorneys’ fees applies to a “so-ordered” stipulation entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Mordue, J.), dismissing a pris
State v. Jillsonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Jillson, 2012-Ohio-1034.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-110430 TRIAL NO. B-1004714 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P
230 B.R. 72 (1999) In re Carl L. HILDEBRAND, Debtor. McLean, Koehler, Sparks & Hammond, Plaintiff, v. Carl R. Hildebrand, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 97-2-1310-DK, Adversary No. 98-1-A119-DK. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Greenbelt. January 21, 1999. *73 Terence B. Garvey, Gaithersburg, MD, for Debtor.
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuelapublic domain
VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 This automatic appeal arises from Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela's ("Acuna") convictions and death sentence for the murder of Edgar S. We have jurisdiction under article 6, section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. §§ 13-4031 and 13-4033(A)(1). ¶ 2 In August 2011, Edgar S. and his girlfriend Perla M.
Lewis v. Andersonpublic domain
509 F.Supp. 232 (1981) Harry LEWIS and Sylvia Baker, Plaintiffs, v. William H. ANDERSON, George L. Bagnall, S. Clark Beise, Shirley T. Black, Roy E. Disney, Ronald W. Miller, Richard T. Morrow, Donn B. Tatum, E. Cardon Walker, Raymond L. Watson, Gordon E. Youngman and Walt Disney Productions, Defendants. No. CV-76-549-IH. United States District Court, C. D. California. March 11
Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co.public domain
517 A.2d 1056 (1986) Sylvia Martin MANN and R. Allen Martin, Trustees Under Deed of Trust Dated June 26, 1972, for the Benefit of Alana Martin Frumkes, and R. Allan Martin, Individually, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 154, 1985. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: October 16, 1985.
Zakre v. Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentralepublic domain
396 F.Supp.2d 483 (2005) Beverly ZAKRE, Plaintiff, v. NORDDEUTSCHE LANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE, Defendant. No. 03 Civ.0257 RWS. United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 2, 2005. *484 Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P.C. by Anne L. Clark, Karen Cacace, New York City, for Plaintiff. McDermott Will & Eme
Golsen v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION Raum, Judge.: This case involves an ingenious device which, if successful, would result in petitioner’s purchase of a substantial amount of life insurance for the protection of his family at little or no after-tax cost to himself, or possibly even with a net profit in some years. The device is based on an unusual type of insurance policy that apears to have 'been spec
Golsen v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION Raum, Judge.: This case involves an ingenious device which, if successful, would result in petitioner’s purchase of a substantial amount of life insurance for the protection of his family at little or no after-tax cost to himself, or possibly even with a net profit in some years. The device is based on an unusual type of insurance policy that apears to have 'been spec
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr