Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1848 ___________________________ Chris Collins, as Next Friend of: J.Y.C.C.; I.K.C.C.; E.A.C.C.; E.L.C.C.; A.R.C.C.; J.R.G.; F.R.A.; R.F.R.C.; S.S.L.; R.D.L.C.; G.N.A.A.; H.G.A.L.; A.X.E.A.; M.Z.A.B.; A.Y.A.G.; I.D.A.A.; J.D.A.E.; Y.D.T.; E.J.D.L.C.D.; N.G.C.V.; Y.G.C.F.; C.P

MEMORANDUM OPINION CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge. Plaintiffs are numerous Peruvian children who allege that they have been injured by exposure to toxic substances from the La Oroya Complex, a metallurgical smelting and refining complex operating in La Oroya, Peru. Through their next friends, they filed these eleven actions in Missouri state court, alleging state tort claims against the American co

MEMORANDUM OPINION . LETITIA Z. PAUL, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The court has held a joint trial on the above captioned adversary proceeding, and *402in the instant Chapter 11 case, the “Amended Motion for (I) Allowance of Secured Claim and Reasonable Fees, Costs, and Charges Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016 and (ii) E

ACCEPTED 02-18-00178-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 5/24/2018 2:13 PM

FILED Aug 01 2025, 10:20 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

B. Marymount's Investigation On the evening of November 8, 2014, Roe allegedly told Z.M., another Marymount student, that Doe had physically and sexually assaulted her. Z.M. was the first person with whom Roe shared her assault allegations. According to the Complaint, Roe did not tell anyone else about the alleged assault until late summer, early fall 2015, almost one year after the alleged incident, when she shared her all

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiff John B. Sender has filed suit against Defendant Franklin Resources, Inc. Under the current operative complaint (la, the second amended complaint or “SAC”), the only claim being asserted is an ERISA claim, more specifically a

MEMORANDUM OPINION Kevin R. Huennekens, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On August 3, 2015 (the “Petition Date”), Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., and 1491 of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) commenced these bankruptcy cases by each filing a separate voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Co

17‐2780 (L) Natural Resources Defense Council v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2017 6 7 (Argued: April 12, 2018

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAVEL MENN, as representative of ) the former shareholders of ) ENDODYNAMIX, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0137-KSJM ) CONMED CORPORATION and ) ENDODYNAMIX, INC.,

ACCEPTED 05-15-01019-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 12:04:49 PM

226 P.3d 889 (2010) 2010 WY 36 ULTRA RESOURCES, INC. a Wyoming corporation and Williams Production Rocky Mountain Co., a Delaware corporation, Appellants (Defendants), v. Doyle and Margaret M. HARTMAN, John H. Hendrix Corporation, Michael L. Klein and Jeanne Klein, Ronnie H. Westbrook and Karen Westbrook, Appellees (Plaintiffs). Arrowhead Resources (U.S.A.) Ltd., Appellant (Defendant), v. Doyle and Margaret M.

Opinion of the C.ourt by Justice ABRAMSON. Subtitle 13 of the Kentucky Business Corporation Act, Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) Chapter 271B, gives shareholders the right to dissent from certain significant corporate actions and to obtain “fair value” from the corporation for their shares. This Court has never addressed “fair value” in a dissenters’ rights action, leaving that issue to be governed for many ye

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M3 USA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-2903 (RDM) v. SUMMER QAMOUM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff M3 USA Corporation (“M3”) brings this action against two of its former emp

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Consolidated IN RE ORACLE CORPORATION DERIVATIVE C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG LITIGATION MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: December 22, 2022 Date Decided: May 12, 2023 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, and David Hahn, of FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M3 USA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-2903 (RDM) v. SUMMER QAMOUM, et al., Defendants. AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Amending the memorandum opinion and order filed on June 4, 2021)

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE ) SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0066-NAC ) NOKIA CORPORATION, a Finnish ) corporation, NOKIA OF AMERICA ) CORPORATION, a Del

ACCEPTED 15-25-00034-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/11/2025 4:55 PM No. 15-25-00034-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

MEMORANDUM OPINION TRACEY N. WISE, Bankruptcy Judge. At issue is whether the Defendant Debtors, Richard and Pamela Williams (collectively the “Williams”) and P & J Resources, Inc. (“P & J”), conducted an elaborate scheme to induce Mr. Raymond Fontaine and his friends and family, in their own right or as successors-in-interest to Mr. Fontaine, to invest millions of dollars in non-existent or ultima