Cases

PER CURIAM: Milton Joseph Taylor, a federal prisonei’, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Hollingsworth, No. 8:07-cv-00970-DKC (D.Md. Oct. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade

[Cite as State v. Taylor-Hollingsworth, 2025-Ohio-3084.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 25AP-156 (C.P.C. No. 18CR-4855) v. :

[Cite as State v. Taylor-Hollingsworth, 2023-Ohio-4435.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 22AP-527 v. : (C.P.C. No. 18CR-4855) Richard J. Taylor-Hollingsworth,

[Cite as State v. Taylor-Hollingsworth, 2020-Ohio-278.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 18AP-873 v. : (C.P.C. No. 18CR-4855) Richard J. Taylor-Hollingsworth,

PER CURIAM. Appellant, Mark Hollingsworth, Jr., challenges a final judgment of dissolution. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in imputing income, in awarding permanent periodic alimony to former wife, in ■determining that the former wife’s Morgan Stanley account was a non-marital asset, and in awarding the alimony retroactive and failing to apply all credits owed to appellant. We affirm in all respects except the

Johnson, J., dissenting: I disagree with the majority’s determination that Hollingsworth did not preserve for appeal the issue of whether the statements he provided to the police during their investigation were voluntarily given. That determination is based upon the majority’s view that Hollingsworth failed to comply with the provisions of K.S.A. 60-404 and, thus, undermined the purpose behind the contemporaneous objection rule.

This is a suit in trespass to try title, brought by T.R. Lambert and Dorothy Lambert, both by next friends, against L.R. Hollingsworth, to recover title to and possession of 4336.5 acres of land comprising the Eli Mercer League in Jackson County, Texas. The petitioner, plaintiff below, seeks to set aside a trustee's sale of said land, under which the respondent claims title, on the ground that at the time of the sale the land was the separate property of Dorothy Lambert, non compos mentis, an

MONTEITH, Chief Justice. This action was brought by appellants, Dorothy Lambert and T. R. Lambert, both by next friends, in trespass to try title for the recovery from appellee, L. R. Hollings-worth, of the title to and possession of 4,336.5 acres of land comprising the Eli Mercer League in Jackson County, Texas. T. R. Lambert died prior to the trial and the suit was thereafter prosecuted by Dorothy Lambert, individually and

BY THE COURT: Appellees’ “Petition for Rehearing En Banc,” construed as a motion for reconsideration of our April 9, 2009, published order and to submit the motion for reconsideration to the full Court, is DENIED. However, on the Court’s own motion, the April 9, 2009, order is clarified by deleting footnote 1 in its entirety. The April 9, 2009, order as originally issued is withdrawn, and the Clerk is directed to is

442 N.E.2d 1150 (1982) Patricia HOLLINGSWORTH, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert E. Hollingsworth, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant, v. Virginia TAYLOR, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Edward Taylor, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 1-1081A295. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. December 21, 1982. Rehearing Denied January 31, 1983.

15 S.W.3d 586 (2000) James HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 03-98-00613-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. March 30, 2000. *589 Gary Taylor, Law Offices of Gary Taylor, Austin, for Appellant. Lisa Dotin Stewart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, for Appellee. Before Chief Justice ABOUSSIE,

876 So.2d 678 (2004) DOR CHA, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Wendell S. HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellee. No. 4D03-2310. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 23, 2004. *679 Stanley Jay Bartel of the Law Offices of Stanley Jay Bartel, Miami, for appellant. Jeffrey H. Rosenthal, Boca Raton,

BY THE COURT: On December 30, 2008, this Court granted Appellees’ motion to stay this appeal pending the Supreme Court’s disposition of Jimenez v. Quarterman, S.Ct. Docket No. 07-6984. On January 13, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Jimenez. See Jimenez v. Quarterman, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 681, 172 L.Ed.2d 475

LOCKEMY, C.J.: In this divorce action, Carolyn Taylor-Cracraft (Wife) appeals the family court’s order, arguing (1) the family court lacked jurisdiction to apportion her 2.26 acres of riverfront property (the Highway 221 Property) because it was nonmari-tal property that had not been transmuted into marital property; (2) the family court erred in listing the Highway 221 Property and the parties’ jointly-owned corporation, Ri

ALMON, Justice. Junior G. Hollingsworth died of smoke inhalation in a house fire on December 25, 1994, while he was the overnight guest of Ronald and Barbara Stults. Raymond Holl-ingsworth, as administrator of Junior Holl-ingsworth’s estate, alleges that a kerosene heater in the Stultses’ house malfunctioned and caused the fire. The Stultses had purchased the heater sometime before 1985. The administrator filed an action aga

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 406 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-23-415 Opinion Delivered September 4, 2024 TRACEY HOLLINGSWORTH APPEAL FROM THE MADISON APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

COLLINS, J. *929INTRODUCTION "Pursuant to constitutional mandate, the Legislature has vested the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) with exclusive jurisdiction over claims for workers' compensation benefits. ( Cal. Const., art. XIV, § 4, Lab. Code, § 5300.)" ( La Jolla Beach & Tennis Club, Inc

549 So.2d 110 (1989) James HOLLINGSWORTH, alias v. STATE. 6 Div. 317. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. February 18, 1988. On Return to Remand May 26, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 30, 1989. Certiorari Denied September 22, 1989. Michael D. Blalock, Birmingham, for appellant. Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and J

Filed 7/24/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR LEANNE HOLLINGSWORTH et al., B297658 Petitioners, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC690999/ v. ADJ11235905) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents; HEAVY TRANSPORT, INC., et al.,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JAMES I. COHN, United States District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s Motion and Memorandum of Law for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on Judicial Estoppel [DE 67] (“Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, Plaintiff’s Response [DE 79] (“Response”), Defendant’s Reply [