Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 221 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 222 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas which denied the application to vacate an arbit

OPINION BY President Judge PELLEGRINI. Temple University Health System and Temple University Hospital (collectively, Employer) petition for review of the orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the decisions of a referee that Claimants1 are not ineligible for benefits under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law)2

744 F.Supp. 700 (1990) BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 89-0999-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. March 30, 1990. *701 *702 William R. Jentes, James M. Amend, Alexan

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, District Judge. Jasminda Lowe pursues this claim against Cardinal Health Inc. for sexual harassment and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII), and under Alabama law for invasion of privacy and negligent and/or wanton training, supervision, and/or retention. Doc. 1 at 1. Lowe contends that Cardinal

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The Affordable Care Act mandates coverage for contraceptive services in group health plans that employers must provide their employees. Churches, nonprofit religious organizations, and for-profit corporations owned by deeply religious individuals challenged this mandate as offensive to their religious beliefs. The federal government responded. Recen

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Neil Gaiman brought suit under the Copyright Act against Todd McFarlane and corporations controlled by him that we can ignore, seeking a declaration that he (Gaiman) owns copyrights jointly with McFarlane in certain comic-book characters. Merchant v. Levy, 92 F.3d 51 (2d Cir.1996); Zuill v. Shanahan, 80 F.3d 1366 (9th

NATHANIEL R. JONES, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLE, J., joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 833-40), delivered a separate concurring opinion. *812OPINION NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. This appeal follows a lengthy employment discrimination trial pitting a longtime professor at Kent State University (“KSU”) against t

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 03-0632V Originally filed September 28, 2015 Refiled in redacted form May 23, 2016 For Publication ******************************** * R.K., on behalf of A.K., a Minor,

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. The court has before it the July 23, 2012 Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 52) filed by Defendants Johnny Kynard Logging, Inc. (“Kynard Logging”), Double K Logging, LLC (“Double K Logging”), Wiggins Trucking, LLC (“Wiggins Trucking”), and John W. Kynard, III (“Kynard”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”). The Motion (Doc.

619 F.3d 1109 (2010) Sylvia SPENCER; Ted Youngberg; Vicki Hulse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WORLD VISION, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-35532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 2009. Filed August 23, 2010. Judith A. Lonnquist, Law Offices of Judith A. Lonnquist, P.S., Seattle, WA, argued the cause for the

633 F.3d 723 (2010) Sylvia SPENCER; Ted Youngberg; Vicki Hulse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WORLD VISION, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-35532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 2009. Filed August 23, 2010. Amended January 25, 2011. Judith A. Lonnquist, Law Offices of Judith A. Lonnquist, P.

MEMORANDUM PRATTER, District Judge. VWR International LLC (‘VWR”) moves to dismiss (Docket No. 29) Alpha Pro Tech, Inc.’s (“APT”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” Docket No. 28). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 As APT alleges in its

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

621 F.Supp.2d 513 (2009) CITY OF CLEVELAND, Plaintiff, v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08 cv 139. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 15, 2009. *515 Mark A. Stanton, Short, Shepherd & Stanton, Ellen M. Kramer, James B. Rosenthal, Joshua R. Cohen, Cohen, Rosent

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: *71Table of Contents I. Introduction.............................................................75 A. Overview............................................................75 B. Plaintiffs’ C

917 F.Supp. 1282 (1996) Usha VAKHARIA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE CENTERS, David J. Roth, M.D., Chidambaram Srinivasan, M.D., Susan Carpo, M.D., Norma Cadayona, M.D., Hae Chang Lee, M.D., Tenkasi Subramanian, M.D., Joon Suk Yu, M.D., Manual U, M.D., Jarema Skirnyk, M.D., Southwest Anesthesia Associates, *1283 S.C., Evergreen Anesthesia and Pain Management Services, S.C.

878 F.Supp. 1224 (1995) CURTIS 1000, INC., Plaintiff, v. Daniel YOUNGBLADE, Defendant. No. C 94-4117. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. January 27, 1995. *1225 *1226 *1227 *1228

BENNETT, District Judge. This case involves the question of whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., preempts Arkansas’ so-called “Patient Protection Act,” Acts 505 and 1193 passed by the Arkansas General Assembly in 1995 (the Arkansas PPA). The Arkansas General Assembly’s goal in passing the PPA was to ensure “that