Cases

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: This case presents cross-appeals from a District Court decision denying Hennepin County and Hennepin County Medical Center (collectively ‘HCMC’) immediate reimbursement under the Medicare statute, Ti-tie XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. section 1395 et seq. (1982 & Supp. V 1987), but remanding the case to the Secretary of Health and Human Services1 (‘

689 F.Supp. 1 (1988) HENNEPIN COUNTY and Hennepin County Medical Center, Plaintiffs, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-0366. United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 17, 1988. On Motion For Reconsideration and Clarification June 1, 1988. *2 H. Guy Collier, Amy E. Hancock, McDermot

883 F.2d 85 280 U.S.App.D.C. 13, 26 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 611,Medicare&Medicaid Gu 37,939 HENNEPIN COUNTY, a Body Politic Organized Under the Laws ofthe State of Minnesota, et al., Appellantsv.Dr. Louis W. SULLIVAN, in his Official Capacity as Secretaryof the United States Department of Health andHuman Services. Nos. 88-5255 and 88-5256. United St

Syllabus Under Minn.Stat. § 508.25 (2004), a purchaser of Torrens property who has actual knowledge of a prior, unregistered interest in the property is not a good faith purchaser. *Page 801 OPINION Joshua Collier purchased a parcel of Torrens property with the knowledge that M I Bank FSB had an unregistered mortgage and purchase interest in t

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1512 Doc: 76 Filed: 08/18/2026 Pg: 1 of 40 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1512 PHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS; NEW ENGLAND YEARLY MEETING OF THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS; BALTIMORE YE

SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendants Michael Campion, Ramona Dohman, and Pat McCormack’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 54] and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 131]; (2) Defendant Rochester Motors’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 76]; (3) Defendant

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant Henne-pin County’s (“Hennepin County”) Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment and/or to Sever with respect to Plaintiff Brook Mallak’s (“Plaintiff’) Complaint relating primarily to violations of the Driv

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. In this consolidated appeal, Brooke Nicole Bass, Johanna Beth McDonough, Dawn Mitchell, and Brian Potocnik (collectively, Drivers) challenge the dismissal of their separate actions against numerous cities, counties, and other government-entities, known and unknown (collectively, Local Entities); numerous unknown law enforcement or other government personn

762 N.W.2d 247 (2009) In the Matter of the Petition of CRABLEX, INC. In Relation to Certificate of Title No. 1091583, issued for land in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, and for a new Certificate of Title after Mortgage Foreclosure Sale. No. A08-0458. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. February 10, 2009. *249 James Christof

KOBES, Circuit Judge. As the district court noted, this is a tragic case. Jacob Anderson (Jacob) died of hypothermia in Minneapolis, Minnesota on December 15, 2013. His father, William Anderson (Anderson), brought this suit alleging federal constitutional and state tort claims against the City of Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and several city and county employees.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant Henne-pin County’s Motion to Dismiss and/or to Sever [Doc. No. 19]; (2) Defendants City of Albert Lea, City of Anoka, City of Blaine, City of Breezy Point, City of Brooklyn Part, City of Champlin, City of Coon Rapids, City of

408 F.Supp.2d 836 (2005) 2005 DSD 21 COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS + BROKERS, and James T. Joyce, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. VIKEN, in his official capacity as South Dakota Secretary of Revenue and Regulation, and Gary Steuck, in his official capacity as Director of South Dakota Division of Insurance, Defendants. No. Civ. 04-3003. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Central

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, filed April 4, 2017 (Doc. 3)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on April 10, 2017. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has jurisdiction over this case given that Plaintiff Firebird Structures fil

83 B.R. 659 (1988) In re HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor. The BANK OF NEW ENGLAND, N.A., Plaintiff, v. HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC. and Steven D. Hanson, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 4-87-1478, Adv. No. 4-87-091. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. March 7, 1988. *660 Phillip W. Bohl, William J. Fisher, Gray, Plant, Mooty,

306 F.2d 119 SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, Appellees. No. 19257. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. July 19, 1962.

ELLIOTT, J. This appeal from a judgment entered m the district court of St. Louis county presents questions of very great importance and the results of the decision will be very far-reaching. It will determine the power of the legislature over methods of taxation, and thus vitally affect the future development of the commonwealth and the individual interests *397of eve

BEAM, Circuit Judge. General Mills Federal Credit Union 1 filed an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt in Michael Hernandez’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court 2 found the debt excepted from discharge, the district court

OPINION CHUTICH, Judge. On appeal from a judgment ordering her eviction, appellant Leah Cervene argues that the district court erred in denying her motion to dismiss the complaint because respondent-landlord Hinckley Squaré Associates (“Hinckley Square”) is a limited partnership and did not appear through licensed counsel in district court. Because we co

OPINION ROSS, Judge. This appeal requires us to decide whether Hennepin County was the proper venue for the state to prosecute Douglas Pierce for violating an order for protection by sending a message electronically to his former girlfriend. The state charged Pierce in Hennepin County with violating the Domestic Abuse Act, Minn.Stat. § 518B (2008), and the district court found him guilty after a bench tri

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant Henne-pin County’s Motion to Dismiss and/or to Sever [Doc. No. 27]; (2) Defendant City of St. Paul’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 32]; (3) Defendant City of Minneapolis’ Motion to Dismiss or for Severance [Doc. No. 37]; (4) De