Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s three separate motions for summary judgment against each of the three Plaintiffs, [Docs. 166, 167, 168]. The Court, having considered the motions, briefs, relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Defendant’s motions are well-taken in part and therefore will be

MEMORANDUM ** Pamela Lawson appeals summary judgment for her former employer, Reynolds Industries, Inc. and Teledyne Reynolds (collectively, “Reynolds”),1 on retaliation claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and the California Fair Housing and Employment Act, Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12940

Cohen, J. On a September evening in 1998, the plaintiff and three companions attended a Boston Red Sox baseball game at Fenway Park. They arrived late, at the top of the fifth inning. The plaintiff took her seat in an unscreened area in the upper box section on the first base line, more or less behind the Red Sox dugout. Several players from the visiting team, the Detroit Tigers, batted before their side was retired. In the bot

Connor, J. Plaintiffs appeal as of right in Docket No. 129864 from the trial court’s May 21, 1990, order granting defendants summary disposition. Defendants also have appealed in Docket No. 131543 from the trial court’s July 30, 1990, order denying their request for costs, sanctions, and attorney fees. We reverse the trial court’s grant of summary disposition and remand this matter to the trial court for additional proceedings.<

29 P.3d 7 (2001) 2001 UT App 198 AUTOLIV ASP, INC., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, Workforce Appeals Board; Thomas A. King; and Christopher Guzman, Respondents. No. 20000574-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. June 28, 2001. *8 Janet Hugie Smith and Paul C. Burke, Ray Quinney & Nebeker, Sal

395 B.R. 637 (2008) In re Lawrence Edward STREET and Chrystal L. Street, Debtors. No. 07-54502. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 30, 2008. *639 D. William Davis, Bridgeport, OH, for Debtors. MEMORANDUM OPINION ON TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR TURNOVER AND OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION

Archer, J. (concurring in the dissent). I agree with the basic rationale and result in Justice Levin’s dissent. I write separately, however, to lend a slightly different perspective. Unlike the dissent, I believe this Court’s opinion in Leahan v Stroh Brewery Co, 420 Mich 108; 359 NW2d 524 (1984), offered a sound a

221 F.Supp.2d 957 (2001) Gema SALVADORI, Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Marie Glasgow, Dona Schwichtenberg, Franklin Education Association, and Wisconsin Education Association Council, Defendants. No. 98-C-1256. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. September 25, 2001. *958 *959

11 F.Supp.2d 1012 (1998) Maria DAVALOS, Plaintiff, v. JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC., Defendant. No. 96-C-519. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 31, 1998. *1013 Willie J. Nunnery, Nunnery Law Office, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. James T. Murray, Jr., Peterson, Johnson & Murray, Milwaukee, WI, for D

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Usha Vakharia worked as an anesthesiologist at Swedish Covenant Hospital (SCH) from 1974 until 1989 when her hospital privileges were terminated ostensibly because of a lack of quality in her care of her patients. Vakharia filed a seven-count complaint against SCH and other defendants alleging, among other things, discrimination on grounds of race, national

66 F.Supp.2d 924 (1999) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Zenith Laboratories, Inc., Biochimica Opos, S.p.A., Roussel Corporation, Roussel UCLAF, S.A. and Rugby Laboratories, Inc., Defendants. No. IP 95-536-C-B/S. United States District Court, S.D.Indiana, Indianapolis Division. June 14, 1999.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–1793 Filed March 6, 2015 DYLAN BOOK and KAREN BOOK, Appellants, vs. VOMA TIRE CORPORATION, HUNTER ENGINEERING COMPANY, IOWA TIRE, INC., HOLT SALES AND SERVICE, INC., SICE, S.p.A. and SICE AUTOMOTIVE Equipment Societa Italiana Costruzioni Elettromeccaniche S.I.C.E.-S.p.A, Defendants, and DOUBLESTAR DONGFENG TYRE COMPANY, LTD., Appellee. ---------------------

FINDING AND ORDER HISTORY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS: These cases are filed by the Ohio railroads, basically, to conform their rates and charges for intrastate transportation to their interstate charges. On December 23, 1957, the Eastern railroads filed an Application for increased rates on certain commodities with the Interstate Commerce Commission, to become effective on February 1, 1958.

WATERMAN, Justice. In this appeal, we must confront unsettled federal precedent to decide whether a Chinese tire manufacturer that sold thousands of tires in Iowa through an American distributor may be compelled to defend a lawsuit here consistent with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. The tire exploded as an Iowan was airing it up at his father’s busines

2 F.Supp.2d 1062 (1998) Reginald K. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. 96 C 6234. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 24, 1998. *1063 *1064 Peter M. King, Canel, Davis & King, Chicago, IL,

982 F.Supp. 1332 (1997) Vickie A. CATLEY, Plaintiff, v. GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 277-M, Defendant. No. 95-C-0177. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 23, 1997. *1333 *1334 Sally A. Piefer, Shindell & Shindell, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff.

100 F.Supp.2d 917 (1999) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Apotex, Inc., Interpharm, Inc., Bernard C. Sherman and Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. No. IP-96-0491-C-B/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. January 12, 1999. *918 Jan M. Carroll, Barnes & Thornb

123 P.3d 966 (2005) Alexander E. GUERRERO, a minor child, by his next friend and father, Cristian GUERRERO; Cristian Guerrero and Juana Guerrero, individually, Appellants, v. ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION and State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Appellees. No. S-11024. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 4, 2005.

164 F.Supp.2d 1078 (2001) Joyce CAMPANA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GREENFIELD, et al., Defendants. No. 00-C-0282. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. September 28, 2001. *1079 *1080 *1081 Robert E. Sutton, Robert E. Sutton Law Office, Milwaukee, WI, f

722 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2010) Perry APSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The BOEING COMPANY and Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 05-1368-EFM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 30, 2010. *1225 Lawrence W. Williamson, Jr., Williamson Law Firm, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Monique K. Centeno, Office of the Public Defend