Cases

934 So.2d 670 (2006) AUTOZONE STORES, INC., a Nevada corporation, as successor in interest to Autozone, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Appellant, v. NORTHEAST PLAZA VENTURE, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company, successor in interest to Plaza Associates, Ltd., an Ohio limited partnership, Appellee. No. 2D05-5023. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 9

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1216 Doc: 35 Filed: 09/14/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1216 ROEE KIVITI; ADIEL KIVITI, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NAVEEN PRASAD BHATT, Debtor - Appellee. Appeal fr

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: On this petition by American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) to review that part of an order 1 2 of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) which denied special permission t

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. State Bd. of Edn., Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-3445.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohi

1 Reported in 184 P.2d 90. Plaintiff brought suit to compel defendant to execute and deliver to it a proper deed conveying the lands described in the contract, hereinafter referred to, *Page 686 free and clear of encumbrances and restrictions, save and except mineral reservations. The real estate involved was purchased under an installment payment

NICHOLLS, J. The plaintiff seeks in this: action to obtain a judgment in solido against the Summit Lumber Company -and the Arkansas Southeastern Railroad Company for the-sum of $10,000, with interest thereon. As the basis for this demand, he alleges: That the Summit Lumber Company and the Southeastern Railroad Company had been for several years, and were then, engaged in the-manufacture of lumber at a sawmill plant owned by the

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE MAY 7, 2020 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON MAY 7, 2020 SUSAN L. CARLSON

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1153 IN RE: BRIAN W. COUGHLIN, Debtor. BRIAN W. COUGHLIN, Appellant, v. LAC DU FLAMBEAU BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS; L.D.F. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORP.; L.D.F. HOLDINGS, LLC; NIIWIN, LLC, d/b/a Lendgreen,

Mr. Justice Lawrence delivered the opinion of the Court: In November, 1861, Cox, the appellant, went to the house of Montgomery, the appellee, in Iroquois county, and proposed an exchange of eighty acres of land owned by the former in Coles county for the farm on which the latter resided in Iroquois county. He represented the Coles county land to be a well-timbered tract, the

Applicability of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act to Tribally Controlled Schools Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act generally applies to tribally controlled schools that receive federal financial assistance from the Department of Justice. November 16, 2004 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS You

471 F.3d 24 In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION.John G. Miles, Saswata Basu, Michael Huff, Sean Rooney, Krikor Kasbarian, Stathis Pappas, James Collins, Diane Collins, Joseph Zhen, Zitto Investments, J. Chris Rowe, Vasanthakumar Gangaiah, Frederick Henderson, Barry Lemberg, Anita Budich, Spiros Gianos, Mary Jane Gianos, and Harald Zagoda, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Mer

766 F.Supp.2d 1095 (2011) WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, Buffalo Field Campaign, Tatanka Oyate, Gallatin Wildlife Association, Native Ecosystems Council, Yellowstone Buffalo Foundation, Meghan Gill, Charles Irestone, and Daniel Brister, Plaintiffs, v. Ken SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior; Susanne Lewis, Park Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park; National Park Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior; Leslie Weldon, Regional Fores

75 Wn. App. 60 (1994) 877 P.2d 703 JANICE L. GOODMAN, Respondent, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, ET AL, Appellants. No. 31648-6-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. July 25, 1994. Russell L. Perisho and Perkins Coie, for appellants. Abraham A. Arditi, for respondent. *64

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal primarily concerns the issue, surprisingly unsettled in this Circuit, as to what standards govern a district judge in adjudicating a motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Comprehended within this broad issue are subsidiary issues such as whether a definitive ruling must be made that each Rule 23 requirement has been met or whether only so

85 Cal.App.2d 529 (1948) COUNTY OF VENTURA et al., Respondents, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant. Civ. No. 15994. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. May 18, 1948. Gail C. Larkin, E. W. Cunningham and Sheridan, Orr, Bates & Barnes for Appellant. M. Arthur Waite, District Attorney, and Donald D. Roff,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 255–381 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Plaintiff in error, L.S. Parks, was convicted on a charge of shooting one Jeff Neal, with intent to kill, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of one year. He has appealed from the judgment rendered upon such conviction, but there has been no appearance on his behalf in this court. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of evidence to sustain the verdict. It appears that Jeff Neal, complaining *Page 408 wi