Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “TODD HIGDON”
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Toddpublic domain
MlKELL, Judge. While driving her friend Ernest Camden’s car, Elizabeth Ann Todd was involved in a collision in Georgia with a car driven by Steve Purvis. Purvis’s passenger, Anthony Bonner, sustained injuries in the wreck, and he sued Todd and Purvis. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company (“State Auto”), Todd’s automobile insurance carrier, filed a declaratory judgment action against Todd, Bonner, and Purvis, seeking a ru
Green v. Higdonpublic domain
OPINION CANTRELL, Judge. The question we have to decide is whether interested parties with notice of a will contest may wait until the conclusion of the contest and then assert that the decedent died intestate. The Circuit Court of Coffee County held that the contestants were bound by the judgment in the will contest. We affirm. I. David King, a leading c
Green v. Higdonpublic domain
870 S.W.2d 513 (1993) Bettye Jean GREEN, Martin King, Deborah Lapidus Fisher, Lisa Lapidus Cohen, and Barry Lapidus, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Carolyn HIGDON, and Main Street Church of Christ, Defendants/Appellants. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. August 4, 1993. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied December 6, 1993. Rehearing
United States v. Melvin Todd Lancasterpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: The government appeals the sentence received by defendant Melvin Lancaster after he pled guilty to bank robbery. We find no error in the sentence and affirm. I Defendant Lancaster and three other individuals robbed a Pinkerton truck outside a bank in Statesville, North Carolina. During the
STATE AUTO. MUT. INS. CO. v. Toddpublic domain
709 S.E.2d 565 (2011) STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. TODD et al. No. A11A0046. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 4, 2011. Reconsideration Denied April 11, 2011. Hawkins, Parnell, Thackston & Young, Brian W. Sprinkle, Atlanta, for appellant. Gardner & Gardner, Milton F. Gardner, Milledgeville, Martin Snow, Cubbedge Snow,
City of Houston v. Rosalba Rodriguezpublic domain
SUBSTITUTE OPINION ON REHEARING CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice. Appellant, the City of Houston (“the City”), files this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying the City’s plea to the jurisdiction. We issued our original opinion on July 12, 2011. Thereafter, the City filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for en banc reconsideration. We
In Re Ricepublic domain
224 B.R. 464 (1998) In re John RICE, and Sherry Rice, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 397-35651PSH7. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon. August 18, 1998. *465 *466 Gerald R. Peterson, Todd Trierweiler and Associates, Portland OR, for Debtor. Kenneth S. Eiler, Seaside, OR, for Trustee.
In Re Limbaughpublic domain
194 B.R. 488 (1996) In re Franklyn C. LIMBAUGH, Laurie A. Limbaugh, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 395-35375psh13. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon. April 3, 1996. *489 Todd Trierweiler, Portland, OR, for debtors. OPINION POLLY S. HIGDON, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the court for confirmatio
JOHN M. BAILEY, JUSTICE *340This interlocutory appeal involves a claim of governmental immunity in an insurance dispute. The Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool challenges the trial court's denial of its plea to the jurisdiction. In its sole issue, the Risk Pool, a governmental entity protected by governmental immunity, asserts t
Roberts v. Galen of Virginia, Inc.public domain
112 F.Supp.2d 638 (2000) Jane ROBERTS, as Guardian for Wanda Y. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. GALEN OF VIRGINIA, INC. d/b/a University of Louisville Hospital formerly d/b/a Humana Hospital-University of Louisville, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 93-0544L-S. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky. at Louisville. April 27, 2000. Robert Spragens, jr., Spragens, Smith & Higdon
Jim McNeff, Inc. v. Toddpublic domain
461 U.S. 260 (1983) JIM McNEFF, INC. v. TODD ET AL. No. 81-2150. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 17, 1983. Decided April 27, 1983. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *261 James T. Winkler argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Steve
Bailey v. Toddpublic domain
126 Ga. App. 731 (1972) 191 S.E.2d 547 BAILEY v. TODD. 47209. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued May 24, 1972. Decided July 7, 1972. Rehearing Denied July 20, 1972. *743 G. Seals Aiken, for appellant. Henning, Chambers & Mabry, Edward J. Henning, Pete
Todd v. Windsorpublic domain
118 Ga. App. 805 (1968) 165 S.E.2d 438 TODD v. WINDSOR et al. 43780. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued July 1, 1968. Decided November 19, 1968. Rehearing Denied December 6, 1968. *806 Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchey & Regenstein, Emmet J. Bondurant, for a
ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge. This action to recover unpaid wages and union health and pension plan contributions was brought under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, by Local 103 (“Union”) and its affiliated pension and welfare plans against Gerald Higdon and his two companies, Higdon Construction Company (“Construction”) and Higdon Contracting Company (“Con
Public Service Commission v. Commonwealthpublic domain
320 S.W.3d 660 (2010) The PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF KENTUCKY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, and Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., f/k/a The Union Light, Heat and Power Company, Appellees. and Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development, Real Party in Interest. The Union Light, Heat and Power Company (n/k/a Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc.), Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, and The Public Service Commission of Kentucky, Appel
NIELSEN, District Judge: This case arises under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Trustees of certain trust funds created pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 186(c), filed this action to recover fringe benefit contributions allegedly due and owing by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. The following facts are uncontroverted in the record.
State v. Pentypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Penty, 2024-Ohio-5397.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 23AP-338 v. : (M.C. No. 22 CRB 17495) Matthew J. Penty, :
324 S.W.3d 373 (2010) KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, ex rel. Jack CONWAY; and Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc. (f/k/a The Union Light, Heat, and Power Company), Appellees. and Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc. (f/k/a The Union Light, Heat, and Power Company), Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, ex rel. Jack Conway; and Kentucky Public Service Commission, Appellees. Nos. 2009-SC
Higdon v. Commonwealthpublic domain
Affirming. On July 12, 1933, there was filed in the Grayson circuit court a petition charging that the petitioner was reliably informed that J.B. Higdon was a person of unsound mind and incompetent to handle his estate by reason of infirmity and weight of age, and asking that an inquest be held to pass on the subject. On account of the absence of the regular circuit judge, the county judge of Grayson county took his place and presided at the trial. At the conclusion of the evidence, in
Outlaw v. Nasworthypublic domain
551 S.E.2d 785 (2001) 250 Ga. App. 362 OUTLAW, v. NASWORTHY et al. No. A01A0199. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 3, 2001. *787 Mills & Chasteen, Ben B. Mills, Jr., for appellant. Chambless, Higdon & Carson, Mary M. Katz, Macon, for appellees. *786