Cases

POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS PARTIES AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.619 FINDINGS OF FACT.621 I. Background.622 A. The Licensor Parties and the Yu-Gi-Oh! Brand.622 B. The Yu-Gi-Oh! License Agreements.622 1. The Short Form Agreem

REDACTED OPINION In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-633C Filed: February 19, 2023 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: March 14, 20231 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * VECTRUS SERVICES A/S, * * P

377 F.3d 272 Antwun ECHOLS, an individualv.Arthur PELULLO, an individual; Banner Promotions, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellants No. 03-2740. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued February 24, 2004. Filed: July 30, 2004. Appeal from the United States District Court for

LINN, Circuit Judge. Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. and Starsight Telecast, Inc. (collectively “Gemstar”) appeal from a final order of the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”), concluding that Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. (“Scientific-Atlanta”) did not infringe Gemstar’s U.S. Patents Nos. 5,479,268 (“the '268 patent”), 5,809,-204 (“the '204 patent”), and 4,70

RILEY, Circuit Judge. This appeal is primarily governed by the standard of review. We directly address a challenge to the appropriate standard for reviewing a district court’s findings of substantial similarity in copyright law cases. We adopt the standard from the majority of other circuits and review the district

399 F.3d 651 CITY OF MONROE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Yoichiro Kaizaki; Masatoshi Ono, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-5505. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 9, 2004. Decided and Filed: F

387 F.3d 468 CITY OF MONROE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Yoichiro Kaizaki; Masatoshi Ono, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-5505. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 9, 2004. Decided and Filed: O

661 F.Supp.2d 958 (2009) LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 08 C 242. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 13, 2009. *959 Ronald Y. Rothstein, Bryna Joyce Roth Dahlin, Eric L. Broxterman, John George Marfoe, Marlen Cortez, Mary M. Hutchings, Winston &

163 F.Supp.2d 322 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. VISA U.S.A. INC., Visa International Corp., and MasterCard International Incorporated, Defendants. No. 98 CIV. 7076(BSJ). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 9, 2001. *323 *324 *325<

431 B.R. 739 (2010) In re GLOBAL TECHNOVATIONS, INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. In re Onkyo America, Inc., Debtor. Global Technovations, Inc. and Kenneth Nathan, Liquidating Agent for Onkyo America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Onkyo U.S.A. Corporation, Onkyo Europe Electronics Gmbh, Onkyo Malaysia Sdn. Bdh., Onkyo Electric (Malaysia) Sdn. Bdh., and Onkyo Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 02-40447, 01-64771. Adve

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 26 CAPITAL ACQUISITION CORP., and ) 26 CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs and ) Counterclaim-Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0128-JTL ) TIGER RESORT ASIA LTD, TIGER ) RESORT LEISURE AND ) ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY McKENNA, J. I. Introduction LaVonne Harrison, Trustee of LaVonne's Family Trust, a Revocable Living Trust Agreement Dated September 28, 1989 ("Harrison"), an owner of two commercial apartments within a mixed-use development project manage

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JAPAN AIRLINES’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (COMPLETE FEDERAL PREEMPTION UNDER THE FEDERAL AVIATION ACT) LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Japan Airlines’(“JAL”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Complete Federal Preemption Under the Federal Aviation Act) (“Motion”), filed on June 24, 2011. Plaintiff Martin Ventress (“Ventre

Opinion ELIA, J. In this action plaintiff Linear Technology Corporation (Linear) alleged that three equipment manufacturers had sold it equipment that was the source of a patent infringement claim against Linear by a third party. The trial court sustained the demurrers of the three defendants, finding insufficient facts to state a cause of action for fraud or unfair competition and lack of subject matter jurisdi

ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. On October 29, 2012, Rovio Entertainment Ltd fka Rovio Mobile Oy (“Plaintiff’) brought the instant copyright and trademark infringement action against Defendants Royal Plush Toys, Inc. (“RPI”), Western Sales and Services Inc. (‘WS & S”), Royal Trade Int’l Inc. (“RTI”), and Jong K. Park (“Park”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Before the Court is Plaintiffs

*43 OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. This case arises out of the sale of a portfolio company by one private equity firm to another. The portfolio company was Double E Parent LLC (“Double E” or the “Company”). The principal sellers were Prairie Capital, III, L.P. and Prairie Capital III

*1084ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE WADA DECLARATION DEAN D. PREGERSON, United States District Judge Presently before the Court are (1) Defendant Toshiba Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Declaration of Ayumi Wada in Support of Defendant Toshiba Corporation’s Motion t

MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“IV”) filed suit against Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”) on March 20, 2013 alleging that various Toshiba products (collecti

20 F.Supp.2d 775 (1998) The CIT GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITICORP, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 98-3066. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 25, 1998. *776 *777 Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart & Olstein by John

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: This action arises out of claims by Plaintiff Brian Anthony Martinez against his former employer, Bloomberg LP (“Bloom-berg”), and two Bloomberg employees, Andrew Lack and Catriona Henderson. Specifically, in his complaint, filed on October 24, 2011, Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendant Bloomberg for unlawful termination in violation of