Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Tammy A. Floyd”
United States v. Floyd Evanspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Floyd Evans pleaded guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(a) and 924(e)(1). The district court 1 determined that Evans was an armed career offender, based on his three previous convictions, 2 - and se
Powers v. Floydpublic domain
904 S.W.2d 713 (1995) Tammy Hartman POWERS, Appellant, v. W.F. FLOYD, M.D., Appellee. No. 10-94-189-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. May 10, 1995. Rehearing Overruled May 24, 1995. *714 John A. (Jack) Sinz, Andrews & Associates, Nacogdoches, for appellant. Lisa L. Havens-Cortes, Bob Burleson, Bowme
OPINION Jeffrey S. Bivins, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Gary R. Wade, and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined. First Community Bank, N.A. (“Plaintiff’), brought suit against multiple defendants for fraud, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and violation of the Tennessee Securities Act, p
State v. Tammy Dianne Brownpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Tammy Dianne Brown, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000988 Appeal From Clarendon County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5914 Heard September 15, 2021 – Filed May 25, 2022
Mike Redford v. Tammy M. Howardpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ June 04, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A20A1364. MIKE REDFORD v. TAMMY M. HOWARD et al. Mike Redford, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a mandamus petition against Tammy Howard, the Clerk of the Douglas County Superior Court, and Ryan Leonard, the District Attorney, seeking to compel the transm
Tammy Watkins v. Officer Lawrence Davispublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-13616 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 1 of 52 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13616 ____________________ TAMMY WATKINS,
FIFTH DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., McFADDEN, P. J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL
Tammy Bandy v. City of Salem, Virginiapublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1565 Doc: 31 Filed: 02/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 12 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1565 TAMMY BANDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.
State of Louisiana v. Dillon Floyd Bazarpublic domain
Judgment rendered June 28, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 55,143-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
Floyd v. Wachovia Bankpublic domain
WOODALL, Justice. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia”), petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Macon Circuit Court to vacate its order denying Wachovia’s motion to transfer the underlying case to Lee County on the ground of forum non conve-*572niens and to enter an order granting the motion. We grant the petition and issue the writ.
Lanndon Floyd Smith v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-13-00625-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG LANNDON FLOYD SMITH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 377th District Court
Enersys Delaware, Inc. v. Hopkinspublic domain
Justice HEARN. This case presents the question of whether the denial of a motion to disqualify an attorney is immediately appealable. We hold it is not and dismiss the case as interlocutory. FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND From 2002 through 2004, George Harper and his law firm at that time, Jackson Lewis, represented EnerSys Delaware, Inc. in a variety of employment and labor law matters. Ha
State v. A. LaForge IIIpublic domain
09/16/2025 DA 23-0147 Case Number: DA 23-0147 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2025 MT 209 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEXANDER GARRETT LAFORGE III,
Floyd v. Mayor of Baltimorepublic domain
946 A.2d 15 (2008) 179 Md. App. 394 Joan L. FLOYD v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, et al. No. 1588, September Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 27, 2008. Reconsideration Denied May 9, 2008. *17 Joan L. Floyd, appellant, pro se. George A. Nilson, City Sol
State of Tennessee v. James William Floydpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 24, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES WILLIAM FLOYD Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. C-19894 Tammy Harrington, Judge No. E2012-00907-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 7, 2013 Defendant, James William Floyd, pled guilty in the Blount County Circuit Court to the
In Re Lehman Bros. Securities and Erisa Litigationpublic domain
681 F.Supp.2d 495 (2010) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION. This document applies to: In re Lehman Brothers Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 6762(LAK). No. 09 MD 2017(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 1, 2010. *496 Joel P. Laitman, Christopher Lometti, Daniel B. Rehns, K
Floyd v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMOREpublic domain
966 A.2d 900 (2009) 407 Md. 461 Joan L. FLOYD v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, et al. No. 56, September Term 2008. Court of Appeals of Maryland. February 19, 2009. Reconsideration Denied April 6, 2009. *902 J. Carroll Holzer (Holzer & Lee of Towson), on brief, for petitioners/cr
State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd Schlitterpublic domain
APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the balance of the majority opinion but dissent on the question of whether Schlitter was subjected to an unwarned interrogation contrary to Miranda v. Arizona under the United States and Iowa Constitutions. 384 U.S. 436, 444-45, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1612, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 706-07 (1966).
State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd Schlitterpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–0346 Filed June 10, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. ZYRIAH HENRY FLOYD SCHLITTER, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Marsha M. Beckelman, Judge. Defendant seeks further review of a court of appeals decision affirming convictions for child endangerment resulting in death
Ronall Floyd Mitchell v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued April 28, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas