Cases

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

No. 526 July 31, 2024 117 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SEBASTIEN BENOIT LUCIER, Defendant-Appellant. Josephine County Circuit Court 21CN02125; A177419 Pat Wolke, Judge. Argued and submitted June 20, 2023. James Brewer, Deputy

325 Argued and submitted March 11, 2021; in State v. Shiffer, decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of conviction vacated in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings; in State v. McKinney, decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of conviction vacated in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings March 3, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on R

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 10/29/2021 01:08 AM CDT - 888 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports CHAMBERS v. BRINGENBERG Cite as 309 Neb. 888 James Chambers, Personal Representative of the

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

No. 20 May 1, 2025 621 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Ron ADELSPERGER; Sally Adelsperger; Walter Arnold; Sandy Arnold; Larry Brewer; Marilyn Brewer; James Brown; Lonna Brown; Bill Burgess; Jane Burgess; Shirley Calkins; Jerry Christensen, aka Gerald Christenson; Cindy Christensen, aka Cynthia Evans-Christenson; Russell Cobb; Norma

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Action for damages alleged to have resulted from overflow of water on plaintiff's land caused by the negligent maintenance of dams in ditches excavated and being excavated for drainage purposes. Judgment against both defendants for $4000, and they have appealed. The Little River Drainage District was organized for the purpose of draining certain lands and plaintiff's land was included in this district. The drainage district let the contract to construct a certain portion of a main ditc

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/15/2019 09:07 AM CST - 872 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports IN RE APPLICATION NO. OP-0003 Cite as 303 Neb. 872 In re A pplication No.

296 Md. 130 (1983) 460 A.2d 1031 JOHN C. CHILDS, SR. ET AL. v. FRANK P. RAGONESE ET AL. [No. 45, September Term, 1982.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 1, 1983. *131 The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE and DAVIDSON, JJ. Neil Tabor for appellants.

The defendant, J. G. Boykin, was charged by information filed in the district court of Oklahoma county, with the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon which was allegedly committed October 26, 1931, by the said J. G. Boykin shooting one Ed Ashworth with a twelve-gauge double-barrelled shotgun and causing serious injuries in the hip, shoulder and leg of said Ed Ashworth. The jury returned a verdict on January 26, 1932, finding the defendant guilty of the crime charged in the informat

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COMITE DE JORNALEROS DE  REDONDO BEACH; NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK, No. 06-55750 Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. v. CV-04-09396-CBM CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, Defendant-Appellant.  COMITE DE JORNALEROS DE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COMITE DE JORNALEROS DE  REDONDO BEACH; NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK, No. 06-55750 Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. v. CV-04-09396-CBM CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, Defendant-Appellant.  COMITE DE JORNALEROS DE

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ROBERT BACON, JR., Petitioner-Appellee, v. No. 99-21 R. C. LEE, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellant. ROBERT BACON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 99-23 R. C. LEE, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee. Appeals from the

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On May 28, 2014, following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff Christopher Barrella (the “Plaintiff’) against the Defendants Village of Freeport (the “Village”) and its former Mayor, Andrew Hardwick (“Hardwick”) (collectively the “Defendants”) awarding him $150,000 in damages for loss of back pay, $1,000,000 for loss of fut

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

This action was commenced in the district court of Greer county on June 2, 1916, by O.A. Lock, as plaintiff, against the First State Bank of Mangum, as defendant, to recover $4,234.10 by reason of usurious interest which he alleged the bank had reserved and collected from him in the sum of $2,117.05 for the loan of money from defendant bank in a series of transactions beginning in January, 1911, and ending in March, 1916; said amount sued for being due, as the plaintiff alleged, under the sta

Per curiam: La Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo de Puerto Rico (1) determinó mediante procedimiento iniciado a instancias de la Unión Local Núm. 65 del Barrio Campo Ale-gre de Hatillo, que el querellado Manuel Acevedo Rosario co-metió prácticas ilícitas del trabajo en violación del art. 8(1) (a) y (c) de la Ley de Relaciones del Trabajo de Puerto Rico. (2) Las viol