⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Tanzer v. Ryan”

Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 19 Or. App. 142; 526 P.2d 1038; 1974 Ore. App. LEXIS 705
PER CURIAM. In this workmen’s compensation case claimant seeks an award for aggravation of preexisting industrial injuries. The hearing officer, board and circuit court held that he had failed to prove his claim by a preponderance of the evidence. We agree with them. The board’s order succinctly states the facts and the conclusion which necessarily follows: “Claimant requests reversal of the Hearing
Law v. Camppublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000-07-26 · Published · cited 12× · 116 F. Supp. 2d 295; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18560; 2000 WL 1580983
116 F.Supp.2d 295 (2000) James A. LAW v. Walter A. CAMP, MD and Dickerman Hollister Jr., MD. James A. Law, Executor of the Estate of Janice C. Law and James A. Law v. Greenwich Hospital, et al. Nos. Civ.3:96CV2147(AHN), 3:96CV2148(AHN). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 26, 2000. *296
Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994-05-17 · Published · cited 7× · 34 Conn. App. 395; 641 A.2d 809; 1994 Conn. App. LEXIS 163
Hetman, J. In this action seeking damages for alleged medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The trial court rejected the plaintiff’s claim that the care afforded to her by the defendant1 Devbala Patel, a pathologist, was a continuous course of treatment commencing in November, 1985, and not terminating unt
Cusick v. Meyerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 100 Or. App. 635; 787 P.2d 1304
WARREN, J., concurring. I concur that our award of an attorney fee is premature at this time, because the prevailing party in the action has not been determined. I write to express disagreement with the majority’s suggestion in footnote 4 that plaintiffs on remand might have a basis for an attorney fees award if they become the “prevailing party.” In an action at law, the prevaili
Stott v. Stevenspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994-04-20 · Published · cited 7× · 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 621; 127 Or. App. 440; 873 P.2d 380
EDMONDS, J. Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in their quiet title claim.1 They assign error to the court’s ruling that, at the time their property was platted in 1910, the grantors reserved property between their property and the Pacific Ocean and that defendants are the owners of that property. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse. Plaintiffs are the p
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990-10-17 · Published · cited 13× · 799 P.2d 180; 104 Or. App. 19; 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1388
799 P.2d 180 (1990) 104 Or.App. 19 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN HAROLD SCHNITZER PROPERTIES AND TRADEWELL GROUP, Inc., a Washington Corporation, and Food Services of America, Inc. Harold Schnitzer Properties, Respondent, v. TRADEWELL GROUP, Inc., a Washington Corporation, and Food Services of America, Inc., Appellants. A8811-06187; CA A61184. Court of Appeals of Oreg
Cusick v. Meyerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989-09-06 · Published · cited 0× · 98 Or. App. 358; 779 P.2d 198
PER CURIAM Defendants appeal and assign as error the granting of plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion on their ejectment claim.1 We reverse because there are several questions of fact. The affidavit of one of the plaintiffs raises a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiffs knew that the property had been partitioned when the deeds were executed. Under plaintiffs’ co
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NATHAN BRICK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0254-KSJM ) THE RETROFIT SOURCE, LLC, ) TRS HOLDCO, LLC and TRS ) MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ASAF BARKAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0855-MTZ ) EXABEAM, INC., ) ) Respondent. )
State v. Jacobspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978-06-13 · Published · cited 6× · 579 P.2d 881; 34 Or. App. 755; 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2580
579 P.2d 881 (1978) 34 Or.App. 755 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. David Anthony JACOBS, Appellant. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted May 15, 1978. Decided June 13, 1978. *882 Thomas Finnegan Ryan, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. Donald L. Paillette, Asst
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010-12-28 · Published · cited 4× · 10 A.3d 92; 125 Conn. App. 665; 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 577
10 A.3d 92 (2010) 125 Conn.App. 665 DAUTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF NEWTOWN. No. 31495. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 1, 2010. Decided December 28, 2010. *94 Robert A. Fuller, Wilton, for the appellant (defendant). Timothy
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2016-03-03 · Published · cited 9× · 546 B.R. 12
OPINION C. KATHRYN PRESTON, Chief Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. An attorney who was sanctioned pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 (“Rule 9011”) filed an .appeal asserting error by the bankruptcy court when it awarded opposing counsel attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 9011(c)(2). Additionally, the attorney argued that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by levying sanctions based
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
10/24/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 13, 2018 Session RONALD DANA HARPER v. ANNETTE CARROL HARPER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 73947 James F. Butler, Chancellor ___________________________________
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 594 B.R. 863
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge David M. Kent, a former plastic surgeon, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, listing among his debts certain obligations that resulted from a state court action for separate maintenance. Kent's estranged wife, Linda Kent, filed an adversary proceeding complaint alleging fraud and challenging dischargeability. After Linda's attorney was allowed to withdraw, and her own enthusiasm for t
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010-12-28 · Published · cited 4× · 10 A.3d 84; 125 Conn. App. 652; 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 584
10 A.3d 84 (2010) 125 Conn.App. 652 DAUTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY OF the TOWN OF NEWTOWN. No. 31496. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 1, 2010. Decided December 28, 2010. *86 David L. Grogins, Danbury, with whom was Barbara M. Schellenberg, Bridgeport,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-08-11 · Published · cited 268× · 537 F.3d 565; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17056; 50 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 113; 2008 WL 3268201
537 F.3d 565 (2008) Larry J. WINGET and the Larry J. Winget Living Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC, and Black Diamond Capital Management Living Trust, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1657. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 17, 2008. Decided
State v. Myerspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971-07-29 · Published · cited 2× · 487 P.2d 663; 1971 Ore. App. LEXIS 683; 6 Or. App. 219
487 P.2d 663 (1971) STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Robert MYERS and Julia Myers, Respondents. Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 1. Argued and Submitted May 19, 1971. Decided July 29, 1971. *664 Jacob B. Tanzer, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Salem.
State v. Petersenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974-07-30 · Published · cited 19× · 522 P.2d 912; 17 Or. App. 478
522 P.2d 912 (1974) STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Toby Edward PETERSEN, Appellant. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 22, 1974. Decided May 28, 1974. Rehearing Denied July 3, 1974. Review Granted July 30, 1974. *914 R. Ryan Lawrence, Portland, argued the cause for appella
State v. Mayespublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1966-12-14 · Published · cited 7× · 421 P.2d 385; 245 Or. 179; 1966 Ore. LEXIS 369
245 Or. 179 (1966) 421 P.2d 385 STATE OF OREGON v. HARRY MAYES Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued October 7, 1966. Reversed December 14, 1966. *180 John D. Ryan, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Ryan & Ryan, Portland. Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy District Attorne
Superior Court of Delaware · 2020-10-01 · Published · cited 0×
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL R. WALLACE NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE JUDGE 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 10400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801