Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Taylor v. Bickham”
Martez Bickham v. Thomas Winnpublic domain
SILER, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which THAPAR, J., joined in part and in the result. THAPAR, J. (pg. 253), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and in the judgment. WHITE, J. (pp. 253-56), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. Petitioner Martez Bickham appeals the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus, in which he argues that the Michigan trial co
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. Allen Bickhampublic domain
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #049 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 25th day of October, 2024 are as follows: BY McCallum, J.: 2023-CC-01364 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE VS. ALLEN BICKHAM, ET AL. (Parish of Orleans Civil)
People v. Taylorpublic domain
People v Taylor (2021 NY Slip Op 03220) People v Taylor 2021 NY Slip Op 03220 Decided on May 20, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
Succession of Bickhampublic domain
518 So.2d 482 (1988) In the Matter of the SUCCESSION OF Talmadge D. BICKHAM, Jr. No. 87-C-1136. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 18, 1988. Rehearing Denied February 25, 1988. *483 Larry S. Bankston, George M. Cotton, Carmouche, Gray & Hoffman, Baton Rouge, for applicants. Curtis K. Stafford, Jr., Tom F. Phi
State v. Taylorpublic domain
962 So.2d 480 (2007) STATE of Louisiana v. Phillip TAYLOR. No. 2007-KA-0069. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. June 27, 2007. Eddie J. Jordan, Jr., District Attorney of Orleans Parish, Battle Bell, IV, Assistant *481 District Attorney of Orleans Parish, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Laura Pavy
Bickham v. Department of Mental Healthpublic domain
592 So.2d 96 (1991) Ivory L. BICKHAM v. DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH and Commercial Union Insurance Company. CRAIG-WILKINSON, INC. and Maryland Casualty Company v. Charles C. SPANN. Nos. 89-CC-1022, 89-CC-0516. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 18, 1991. *97 James W. Craig, Jackson, for appellant in No. 89-CC-1022
State v. Taylorpublic domain
701 So.2d 766 (1997) STATE of Louisiana v. Edgar J. TAYLOR. No. 96-KA-1843. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 29, 1997. *769 Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, Kevin J. Gillie, Assistant District Attorney, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Archie B. Creech, Orleans Indigent Defen
Bickham v. Gulf Refining Co.public domain
In February, 1913, the Gulf Refining Company, made defendant herein, secured from W.E. Barnhart a mineral lease on certain land in the parish of Caddo. Defendant exploited the land, under the lease, for oil and gas, and discovered the former in large and the latter in small quantities. About a year later, plaintiffs in this case, together with others, brought suit in the district court for the parish of Caddo, claiming a one-fifth interest in the land leased by Barnhart to defendant. P
Bickham Motors, Inc. v. Crainpublic domain
185 So.2d 271 (1966) BICKHAM MOTORS, INC. v. James L. CRAIN. No. 6612. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. April 4, 1966. *273 John W. Anthony, of Talley, Anthony, Hughes & Knight, Bogalusa, for appellant. Hilary J. Crain, of Watts & Crain, Franklinton, for appellee. Before ELLIS, LOTTINGER, LANDRY,
Taylor v. Shreveport Airport Authoritypublic domain
SEXTON, Judge. This is an appeal from a trial court judgment sustaining the defendants’ declinato-ry exception of improper venue. For the following reasons, we affirm. Defendant City of Shreveport (City) ■ owns the Downtown Airport located in the northeast part of the city. The original boundary between Caddo and Bossier Parishes was the Red River. Because of the eastward movement of the Red River, the Do
Bickham v. Southern California Edison Co.public domain
120 Cal.App.2d 815 (1953) CARL M. BICKHAM, Respondent, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Defendants; GOLDEN BEAR OIL COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant. Civ. No. 19448. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. Oct. 26, 1953. Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee for Appellant. James V. Brewer and Frank G. Howe for
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-25-00038-CV ———————————— Victoria Trading Company, LLC, MJR Investments, Ltd, Jana L. Bickham, as Independent Executor of the Estate of Joe P. Pritchett, Deceased, Jana L. Bickham as Independent Executor of the Estate of Jean Ann, Pritchett, Deceased, Tom E.
980 F.2d 648 60 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 822,60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,990,37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 980Issiah ROSS, Jr., Eddie Slaughter, William Morgan Porter,Johnnie Lee Palms, James C. Homer, John W. Taylor, VernonAlexander Putman, Hosey J. White, Jr., Franklin RooseveltScott, Gerry Plant, Tabitha Herring, George Rumph, NanetteTyson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.W
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Abbot Laboratoriespublic domain
(2008) TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Fournier Industrie Et Sante and Laboratoires Fournier S.A., Counterclaim Defendants. Impax Laboratories, Inc., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Abbott Laboratories, Fournier Industrie Et Sante and Laboratoires Fournier S.A., Counterclaim Defendants. In re Tricor Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation. In re
Canal Insurance v. Moorepublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge. This cause comes before this Court on the following Motions: plaintiff’s Motion for Declaratory Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202; defendant Moore Trucking’s Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; defendant Linda Tanner’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and defen
Freelon v. GRG Farms, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Freelon v. GRG Farms, Inc., 2024-Ohio-4764.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY Suzanna Freelon, As a Director of Court of Appeals No. H-23-022 GRG Farms, Inc. and as Successor Trustee of the Homer Ray Roof Trial Court No. CVH 2021 765 Revocable Living Trust Appellee v. GRG Farms, Inc. et al.
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #004 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 6th day of February, 2025 are as follows: BY Griffin, J.: 2024-C-00406 PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, L.L.C. VS. DEVERE SWEPCO JV, L.L.C., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND UNITY VILLAGE HOMES, L.L.C. (Parish of St. Landry)
Rosenblat Properties, LLC v. Shweta Kohsmannpublic domain
ROSENBLAT PROPERTIES, * NO. 2024-CA-0216 LLC * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * SHWETA KOHSMANN FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
432 F.Supp.2d 408 (2006) ABBOTT LABORATORIES, an Illinois corporation, Fournier Industrie et Sante, a French corporation, and Laboratoires Fournier S.A., a French corporation, Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, an Israeli corporation, and Novopharm, Ltd., a Canadian corporation, Counterclaim Plaintiff
Rita Ann Jenkins v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00754-SCT RITA ANN JENKINS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/22/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CALEB ELIAS MAY TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MITCHELL DEE THOMAS CHRISTOPHER MORGAN POSEY STEVEN SIMEON KILGORE