Cases

Beck, J. (dissenting). The majority describes the claim of the remaining partners of the law firm of Fern, Anderson, Donahue, Jones & Sabatt, P.A. (Fern), against Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy (Milbank) as based on Milbanks’s failure “to be alert to irregularities that presented themselves when Milbank received an opinion letter on Fern’s letterhead that was not signed by a person listed thereon as a partner.” Ante at 58

625 F.3d 1092 (2010) OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION; Committee for the High Desert; Western Watersheds Project, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; Elaine M. Brong, State Director, Oregon/Washington BLM; Tom Dabbs, Field Manager, Malheur Resource Area, BLM; Jerry Taylor, Field Manager, Jordan Resource Area, BLM, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-35931. United States Court of Appeals, Nin

531 F.3d 1114 (2008) OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION; Committee for the High Desert; Western Watersheds Project, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; Elaine M. Brong, State Director, Oregon/Washington BLM; Tom Dabbs, Field Manager, Malheur Resource Area, BLM; Jerry Taylor, Field Manager, Jordan Resource Area, BLM, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-35931. United States Court of Appeals, Nin

MEMORANDUM ** Edwin C. Bickell appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying Bickell’s application for disability and supplemental security income benefits.1 We affirm. The administrative law judge (ALJ) provided specific, clear and convincing reasons for discrediting Bickell’s testimony abo

MEMORANDUM ** Edwin C. Bickell appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying Bickell’s application for disability and supplemental security income benefits.1 We affirm. The administrative law judge (ALJ) provided specific, clear and convincing reasons for discrediting Bickell’s testimony abo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30177 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:19-cr-00408- IM-1 LEOPOLDO RIVERA-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHERRY H. DETWILER, No. 23-3710 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01306-JR v. MID-COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER; CHERI MCCALL, an OPINION individual; DOES, 1 through 50, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United State

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: The government appeals the fifty-month sentence imposed by the district court following Christopher Pike’s plea of guilty to bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). It argues that the district judge applied an incorrect standard of proof in considering whether to impose a five-level enhancement for possession of a firearm and that, under the correct s

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: Floyd Lovell Fish appeals his sentence of 51 months incarceration and three years of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In setting Fish’s base offense level at 20, the district court concluded that Fish’s prior conviction for violation of Or. Rev. Stat.

552 F.3d 965 (2009) State of OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee. No. 06-36012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 23, 2008. Filed January 8, 2009. *966 Hardy Myers, Mary H. Willi

BERZON, Circuit Judge. Once more, we are asked to determine whether a federal defendant’s previous state-law conviction is for a “felony that is ... a crime of violence” under section 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Patino, 391 F.3d 1034, 1036-38 (9th Cir.2004) (per curiam); Un

*908 ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER The mandate issued on July 13, 2005 is recalled for the purpose of amending the opinion as follows: The amended opinion filed July 5, 2005, slip op. 7773, appearing at 2005 WL 1560269 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005), is amended as follows:

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30177 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. V. 3:19-cr-00408- IM-1 LEOPOLDO RIVERA-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted En Bane March 19, 2025 San Francisco, California Filed September 18, 2025 Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Ronald M. Gould, Consuelo

SULLIVAN, J. *472Corinna von Schönau-Riedweg (von Schönau), a Swiss citizen, inherited a considerable *101fortune in the stock of Novartis International AG, a Swiss pharmaceutical company, upon her mother's death in 2002. She turned for advice to Baron Wi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-30528 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CR-04-00340-GMK CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL PIKE, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District

903 F.Supp. 353 (1995) F.W. MYERS & CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. WORLD PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. No. 95-CV-981. United States District Court, N.D. New York. November 8, 1995. *354 Stafford, Trombley, Purcell, Lahtinen, Owens & Curtin, P.C., Plattsburgh, NY (of counsel, William L. Owens), for plaintiff. O

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-30219 v.  D.C. No. RICHARD ORLAND DAVIS, CR-04-30061-ALA Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-30220 v.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30387 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-30012-AA ISIDRO MORENO-HERNANDEZ, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF OREGON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 06-36012 v. D.C. No. LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION,  CV-05-01443- Defendant-Appellee, REJ/PP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Intervenor-Appellee.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30387 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-03-30012-AA ISIDRO MORENO-HERNANDEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court