⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Taylor v. Jackson”

Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 79; 202 L. Ed. 2d 53
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-05-31 · Published · cited 21× · 95 A.D.3d 1604; 945 N.Y.S.2d 465
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), entered June 28, 2011, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the amended petition. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of three children (born in 2002, 2004 and 2005). In September 2005, and upon the father’s
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 95 A.D.3d 1604; 945 N.Y.S.2d 465
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), entered June 28, 2011, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the amended petition. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of three children (born in 2002, 2004 and 2005). In September 2005, and upon the father’s
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1153; 119 S. Ct. 1056
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1153
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994-06-02 · Published · cited 9× · 643 A.2d 771; 164 Pa. Commw. 482; 1994 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 267
164 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 482 (1994) 643 A.2d 771 Valerie A. TAYLOR, Robert Taylor and Peggy Taylor v. Monte L. JACKSON, Sharkey Transportation, Chester Ray Watley, Jr., C. Stransky Trucking Company, Action Trailer Rental, Inc., Pennsylvania Power & Light Company, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania — Pennsylvania State Police, Gerald A. Franz, Joseph J. Questore, Montgomery Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., Montgomery Auction Exch
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 2813; 207 L. Ed. 2d 147
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-01-06 · Published · cited 23× · 984 F.3d 1107
Case: 17-60856 Document: 00515696581 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2021 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-60856
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 568 U.S. 894; 133 S. Ct. 291
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2019-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00146-CV ____________________ TAYLOR LASTOR, Appellant V. JOHN LIONEL JACKSON, Appellee ___________________________________________________________
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 414 So. 2d 1; 1982 Ala. LEXIS 3189
This appeal by the Plaintiffs below challenges the trial court's granting of Defendant Jack Jackson's motion for summary judgment. Because the Appellants' pleadings and counter affidavit fail to raise even the slightest hint of a factual issue with respect to the Appellees' connection with or relationship to the transaction made the basis of Appellants' claim, the summary judgment appealed from is due to be, and is hereby, affirmed. A.R.C.P. 56. AFFIRMED. TORBERT, C.J.,
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1979-06-05 · Published · cited 3× · 470 F. Supp. 1290; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11945
470 F.Supp. 1290 (1979) Jorge TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. Norwood JACKSON and the Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondents. No. 79 CIV. 383 (MP). United States District Court, S. D. New York. June 5, 1979. *1291 Jorge Taylor, pro se. Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of the State of New York, New York City, for respondent
Jackson v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004-02-20 · Published · cited 1× · 153 S.W.3d 842; 2004 Ky. App. LEXIS 36; 2004 WL 315153
153 S.W.3d 842 (2004) Charles Demetric JACKSON, Appellant, v. Vertner L. TAYLOR, Appellee. No. 2003-CA-000339-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 20, 2004. Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court February 9, 2005. *843 Charles Jackson, West Liberty, pro se. Brenn O. Combs, Frankfort, KY, for ap
Taylor v. Jacksonpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1973-10-04 · Published · cited 2× · 514 P.2d 548; 267 Or. 33; 1973 Ore. LEXIS 267
514 P.2d 548 (1973) John L. TAYLOR and Frank Hilton, Respondents, v. Margaret B. JACKSON, Appellant, Dallas E. Jackson et al., Respondents, Robert Lohman, Intervenor-Appellant. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted May 3, 1973. Decided October 4, 1973. *549 Keith Burns, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Ma
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 21, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143495
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2005-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-03-00257-CR ___________________
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2026-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered May 27, 2026. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,706-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3151 ISAIAH TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTIN SCHWARZHUBER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-03-17 · Published · cited 18× · 132 F.4th 480
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3151 ISAIAH TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTIN SCHWARZHUBER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, July 17, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0275. JACKSON TAYLOR STOUT v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: ST18CR0247 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's