Cases

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Monroe Guaranty Insurance Company, appeal the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant, Zurich Insurance Company, in this action to recover a portion of a payment made in settlement of a personal injury claim. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the District Court is AFF

873 N.E.2d 416 (2007) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UTICA NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP, Defendant-Appellant (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Plaintiff). No. 1-06-3339. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. July 23, 2007. *417 Pretzel & Stouffer Chartered, Chica

Corrigan, C.J. We granted leave to appeal to consider whether the “household exclusion” provision of MCL 500.3123 applies where a person owning damaged property is insured under a no-fault property protection policy that does not cover the vehicle that *144person was operating at the time of the accident. We hold that the exclusion applies in those circumstances. We thus

41 P.3d 366 (2001) 2001 OK 113 Harry G. SCOUFOS IV, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO., Defendant/Appellant. No. 94,395. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. December 11, 2001. Clyde A. Muchmore and Harvey D. Ellis, Jr., of Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City, OK; John A. Gladd and Gail Harris of Gladd, Smith & Harris, Tulsa, OK

754 N.E.2d 978 (2001) Kermalynn FRANZ, individually, and as the parent, natural guardian, and next friend of Glenn Charles Taylor, a minor, and Liberty Baptist Church, a/k/a Liberty Baptist Church and School a/k/a Liberty Baptist Church of Glen Park, Inc., Appellants-Defendants, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 45A03-0102-CV-39. Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted in Part and Denied in Part, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed January 7, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00430-CV IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 11

ORDER HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In these declaratory-judgment cases, two State Farm entities seek declarations that they do not owe coverage or a duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Robert Eugene Marshall for liability related to an altercation with Defendant Thomasina Parks in Marshall’s Toyota Avalon. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Marshall et al., No

Taylor, J. We granted leave to appeal in this case to review the Court of Appeals first impression construction of the phrase “in the care of” in a homeowner’s insurance policy. The Court of Appeals determined that the phrase was ambiguous and that there was no genuine issue of material fact that Dawn Mysierowicz, plaintiff’s assignor, came within the definition of an insured

59 F.Supp.2d 1217 (1999) William M. ALLEN, etc., Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants. No. CA 98-1226-MJ-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 25, 1999. *1218 *1219 Steven A. Martino, Mobile, AL, Stephen

Bethel, Judge. *318 Charles and Alberta Taylor (collectively, the Taylors) appeal from a trial court's order granting State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's motion for summary judgment. The Taylors contend the trial court erred in finding that they failed to provide timely notice of their cl

EDMONDSON, J. ¶ 1 Douglas bought real property by a contract for deed. The seller of the property was the named insured on an insurance policy. After the property was damaged Douglas brought an action in the District Court against the insurer. We hold Douglas’ equitable title to the. property arising from the contract for deed is insufficient by itself to confer

OSCN Found Document:HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

930 P.2d 382 (1997) Frank J. HATCH, III; Wendy Hatch; Frank J. Hatch, IV; and by Frank J. Hatch, III and Wendy Hatch as next friend for their minor children Anna Corinna Hatch; Matthew Hatch; and Michael Hatch, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation; Garry Kitchens; and Dennis Murphy, Appellees (Defendants). No. 95-78. Supreme Court of Wyoming.

STEWART, J. hAt issue in this appeal from a summary judgment is the validity of a waiver of uninsured / underinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage on behalf of the Bossier Parish Police Jury (hereafter the “police jury”). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the police jury’s liability insurer, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) and dismissed the claims of the plaintiffs, Richard and Betty Gun

Francesco Marino appeals from the judgment of the trial court that he take nothing in his suit against State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Co., AID Consulting Engineers, Inc., Loy B. Taylor, and Pat H. Donley, individually and doing business as Forensic Associates. In two points of error he contends that the trial court erred: in granting a summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Co., since there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether or not S

ORDER ON APPLICABILITY OF MEDICAL PRIVACY LAWS TO MOTIONS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS BROUGHT BY NON-PARTY LAW FIRMS (DEs 129, 130,133, 138, 139,143,157, 200, 206, 232) JAMES M. HOPKINS, United States Magistrate Judge. THIS CAUSE has come before this Court upon an Order referring discovery matters to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for final disposition. (DE 5). <

McDONALD, Judge. This appeal by State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company is from a judgment entered against the insurer after the trial court determined that an insurance policy issued to the appellees, Neal and Diane Aulick, covered damages resulting from the delivery of heating oil to the residence of the insureds. The sole issue in the direct appeal is whether the trial court erred in declaring the existence of such

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LUCILLE COVINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Appellee. No. 4D21-377 [November 17, 2021] Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial

ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge. | gThis is a wrongful death and survival action brought by the son of Barbara Viola Fouchi against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), the homeowner’s insurer of her husband, Dr. Dana Ray Fouchi, who shot and killed her before committing suicide. Her son, Dylan Carey Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”), appeals the trial court judgment granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment based on

EYLER, DEBORAH S., J. During a blizzard in the winter of 2010, Moira and Gregory Taylor’s carport in West River, Anne Arundel County, collapsed under the weight of ice and snow. They filed a claim under their homeowners insurance policy (“the Policy”) with State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance (“State Farm”), the appellee. State Farm denied the claim on the ground that the *441