Cases

*797 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. Plaintiff ABF Freight System, Inc. (“ABF”) brings this action for violation of a collective bargaining agreement against YRC, Inc., New Penn Motor Express, Inc., and USF Holland, Inc. (collectively, “YRCW”)1; the International Brotherhood of Teamster

461 F.3d 982 Stephen E. JONES, Appellant,Doyle Clark, Appellant,v.UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; Local 41 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Appellees. No. 05-2202. No. 05-2205. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 13, 2006. Filed: August 22, 2006.

182 Kan. 440 (1958) 321 P.2d 564 HYDE PARK DAIRIES, INC., Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, STABLEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION No. 795, Affiliated with American Federation of Labor and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Organization or Association; S.E. SMITH, Individually, and as Business Agent of said L

OPINION AND ORDER PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge. Marjorie Payne (“Plaintiff’) filed this action to recover compensation under an employment contract. The defendants are the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local Lodge 698 (“Lodge 698”) and two officials of Lodge 698’s parent organization, Raymond Briggs and Mark Ward. Briggs has filed a counterclaim against Plai

181 Kan. 898 (1957) 317 P.2d 817 RICHARD NEWELL, d/b/a EL DORADO DAIRY, Appellee, v. CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS & HELPERS LOCAL UNION 795; S.E. SMITH and the agents, servants, employees and attorneys of any of said defendants, Appellants. No. 40,486 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed November 9, 1957. Russell Cranmer, of Wichita, ar

371 F.Supp.2d 1097 (2005) Michael CARR, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL UNION 1593, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS; and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Defendants. No. A1-04-018. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. May 18, 2005. *1098 *1099

BAZELON, Chief Judge: Since 1963 Local 455 of the Retail Clerks Union and the grocery stores of the Kroger Company in southern Texas have agreed to collective bargaining contracts which include a so-called “additional store clause.” Under such clauses1 the employer agrees to recognize the Union as the bargaining agent for the employees in any stores added to the originally certified bargaining unit

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs in this suit under ERISA and section 301 of the TafNHartley Act are nine multiemployer pension and welfare funds established pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. The funds are complaining about delinquent contributions by a small Wisconsin construction company between 1993 and 1998, and they appeal from a grant of summary judgment l

510 F.2d 802 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2592, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 422,76 Lab.Cas. P 10,632 RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL NO. 455,AFL-CIO, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.RETAIL CLERKS UNION, LOCAL NO. 560 RETAIL CLERKSINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 74--1208, 74--1209.<

BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge. A group of General Motors (GM) workers (the Blount group) brings this suit against GM and its representative unions, alleging violations of section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (1988). The Blount group asserts GM violated its collective bargaining agreement by refusing to permit its members to transfer from a plant GM was closing to a new replacement facility. The Blount g

984 F.2d 244 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2414, 124 Lab.Cas. P 10,517 Dan L. BLOUNT; Edna M. Bond; Reginald G. Bowers; GlendaL. Boyer; Robert Dwight Chitwood; David M. Cornish;Thomas B. Darr; James E. Fears; Ann A. Foster; Brenda D.Diedrich; Paul E. Gagnepian, Jr.; Sherri L. Hastings;Richard P. Henderson, Jr.; Yvonne Hopkins; Daniel L.Keely; Rick D. Kindrick; Donald L. Kohlfeld; Ray P.Kosul

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY, derivatively on ) behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0795-JRS ) FREDERICK W. SMITH, DAVID J. ) BRONCZEK, ALAN B. GRAF, JR., ) HENRY J. MAIER, DAVID P. STEINER, ) S

727 F.Supp. 795 (1989) Justina GHARTEY, Plaintiff, v. SAINT JOHN'S QUEENS HOSPITAL and Local 1199, Drug, Hospital and Health Care Employees Union RWDSU/AFL/CIO and Mary Kelly Quinn and Winifred Paul, Defendants. No. 87 CV 3111. United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 7, 1989. As Amended December 15, 1989.

660 F.Supp.2d 900 (2009) CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and Howard McDougall, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. SARA LEE BAKERY GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation (f/k/a The Earthgrains Company), as Successor in Interest to Metz Baking Company, Defendant. Case No. 07 C 5880. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 28, 2009.

286 F.Supp.2d 56 (2003) In re RELAFEN ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. CIV.A. 01-12239-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 1, 2003. *57 William Alper, Cohen, Pontani, Lieberman & Pavane, New York, NY, for Eon Labs, Inc., Consol Plaintiff. Richard A. Arnold, Kenny Nachwalter Seymour Arnold Critchlow & Spect

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court, in this pro se employment discrimination action filed by Margo Carris (“Plaintiff’) against First Student, Inc. (“Defendant”) are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2) (Dkt. No. 25); and (2) Defendant’s cross-motion to d

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 00-3648 and 00-3870 Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. Gustafson Construction Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 96 C 956--Thomas J. Curran, Judge. Argued June 6, 2001--Decided July 20, 2001 Before Fairchild, Bauer, and Posner, Circuit Judges.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0218p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ QUICKWAY TRANSPORTATION, INC., │ Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

922 F.Supp. 1227 (1996) Deborah WEATHERHOLT, Plaintiff, v. MEIJER INC., Kim Debottis, Jason Holdaway, David Berger, Pamela Herrera and Jennifer Sinclair, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-40012. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 4, 1996. *1228

SACK, Circuit Judge. This appeal, arising out of circumstances surrounding a lawsuit in which a drug manufacturer alleged that its patent for the drug tamoxifen citrate (“tamoxifen”) was about to be infringed, and the suit’s subsequent settlement, requires us to address issues at the intersection of intellectual property law and antitrust law. Although the particular factual circumstances of this case are unlikely to recur, th