Cases

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge McGOWAN. McGOWAN, Circuit Judge: This case arises on cross-petitions for review of the resolution by the National Labor Relations Board of complaints filed by Bigge Drayage Company against Building Materials & Construction Teamsters Union, Local No. 216, alleging violations of Sections 8(e) and 8(b)(4)(ii)(D) of the National Labor Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1

520 F.2d 172 90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 440,77 Lab.Cas. P 11,089 BUILDING MATERIAL & CONSTRUCTION TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL NO.216, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN, & HELPERS OFAMERICA, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,andBigge Drayage Company, Intervenor.BIGGE DRAYAGE COMPANY, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABO

709 F.2d 815 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2868, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3311,97 Lab.Cas. P 10,232,4 Employee Benefits Ca 1947 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS INTERNATIONALUNION LOCAL 54; and Frank Gerace, President Hoteland Restaurant Employees and BartendersInternational Union Local 54andInternational Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local 331,

469 F.Supp. 437 (1979) Michael D. CAPPA, Plaintiff, v. Phillip WISEMAN, Individually and d/b/a Denticator, Denticator Co., Inc., a corporation, and Warehouse Union Local 860, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, Defendants. No. C-76-624 WHO. United States District Court, N. D. California. February 21, 1979. Francis J. McTerna

100 F.Supp.2d 149 (2000) Jack F. MAROTTA, Plaintiff, v. ROAD CARRIER LOCAL 707 WELFARE FUND, Defendant. No. CV 98-6642 (MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 16, 2000. *150 *151 *152 Bernard Weinreb, Suffern, NY, for plaintiff. Kar

*875 OPINION GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge. I. Introduction Indirect purchasers1 of domestic eggs and egg products charge producers of those goods, and the producers’ trade groups, with conspiring to manipulate the supply of, and thereby fix prices for, domestically-sold eggs an

Opinion BORDEN, J. The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether the plaintiffs, a Connecticut municipality and *316its mayor, have standing to assert the various causes of action that they have alleged against the defendants, who are various firearms manufacturers, trade associations and retail sellers.1 The pl

891 F.Supp. 875 (1994) Thomas ALGIE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RCA GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and MCI Communications Corporation, Defendants. No. 89 Civ. 5471 (MJL) (MHD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 22, 1994. *876 *877 *878

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: At first blush, it appeared that we con- • fronted a labor question of first impression in the courts of appeals: To what extent is a collective bargaining agreement, whose genesis is a pre-hire agreement, enforceable beyond the projects already under way at the time of its repudiation? However, following substantial consultation of authority, and subsequ

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.

284 F.Supp.2d 511 (2003) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION, Pamela M. Tittle, Thomas O. Padgett, Gary S. Dreadin, Janice Farmer, Linda Bryan, John L. Moore, Betty J. Clark, Shelly Farias, Patrick Campbell, Fanette Perry, Charles Prestwood, Roy Rinard, Steve Lacey, Catherine Stevens, Roger W. Boyce, Wayne M. Stevens, Norman L. and Paula H. Young, Michael L. McCown, and Dan Schultz, on behalf of themselves and a cl

678 F.2d 257 28 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1614,25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 614,28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,668, 219 U.S.App.D.C. 393,94 Lab.Cas. P 34,186 Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al., Appellants,v.Danford L. SAWYER, Jr., Public Printer, Individually and asPublic Printer of the United States, and hisagents, assigns and successors in office.Dorothy M. THOMPSON, et al.,v.Danford L. SAWYER, J

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS