Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Tejada v. State of Alaska Department of Correction”
Daily v. People of State of New Yorkpublic domain
388 F.Supp.2d 238 (2005) James DAILY, Petitioner, v. The People of the State of NEW YORK, Respondent. No. 02 Civ. 2725(PKC)(FM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 22, 2005. *239 *240 *241 James Daily, Coxsackie, NY, pro se. <
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Garnett v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AARON GARNETT, § § No. 376, 2022 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 2003009148 (K) STATE OF DELAWARE, §
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Jackson, 2015-Ohio-3520.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 14CA010593 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE TYRONE JACKSON
Commonwealth v. Mikitiukpublic domain
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: *294Appellant Victor Charles Mikitiuk appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County following Appellant's conviction by a jury on one count of manufacture, delivery, or possession with the intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance (methamphetamine), one cou
Pratt v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The issue for decision is whether disclaimers in a tax sale contract preclude the purchaser’s claims for breach when the IRS allegedly failed to properly levy and seize the property and when the tax sale contract also contained language, that notice had been given