Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 15, 2022 Decided July 8, 2022 No. 21-1111 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., PETITIONER/CROSS-RESPONDENT v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT/CROSS-PETITIONER TEMPLE ALLIED PROFESSIONALS, PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF STAFF NURSES AND ALLIED PROFESSIONALS,

MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge. The Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which reversed its final order certifying the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 835, AFL-CIO (Union) as the exclusive representative of a collective bargaining unit consisting of certain nonprofessional employees of Temple University Health Systems at the Lower Bu

Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge: For more than 40 years, the labor relations of the petitioner, Temple University Hospital, were conducted under the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB). Since 2006 the Hospital has been in a collective bargaining relationship with Temple Allied Professionals, Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals (th

747 F.Supp.2d 416 (2010) JEANES HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SIBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-cv-0395. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 28, 2010. *417 Gregory L. Liacouras, Liacouras & Smith, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Terry S. Coleman, Ropes & Gray

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PHILIP P. SIMON, Chief Judge. Notre Dame seeks a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the part of the Affordable Care Act that requires employers to provide employees with health insurance that covers contraceptive services. Notre Dame objects to providing contraceptive care on religious grounds, and that of course

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge. This Memorandum and Order addresses (1) Plaintiff Rose Ure Mezu’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, ECF No. 54; Defendant Morgan State University’s1 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Second2 Motion to Compel, ECF No. 55; Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion to Strike,

817 F.Supp.2d 556 (2011) Collette DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. Susan Frattarola, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mercy Health System of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al., Defendants. Kenneth Lynn, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Aria Health System, et al., Defendants. Kenneth Lynn, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson Health System, Inc., et al., Defendants. Cassandra Ruff, et al.

453 F.Supp.2d 888 (2006) JEANES HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, v. Michael O. LEAVITT, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-CV-395. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 29, 2006. *889 Gregory L. Liacouras, Liacouras & Smith, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Te

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge: Sister Elizabeth McDonough and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission allege that The Catholic University of America engaged in sex discrimination and retaliatory conduct, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when it denied her appl

41 Cal.3d 601 (1986) 715 P.2d 590 224 Cal. Rptr. 631 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF INTERNS AND RESIDENTS, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. S.F. 24803. Supreme Court of California. April 3, 1986.

376 F.Supp. 1099 (1974) MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, INC., Plaintiff, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare and Blue Cross of Florida, Inc., Defendants. No. 73-804-Civ-JLK. United States District Court, S. D. Florida, February 6, 1974. *1100 *1101

241 So.2d 469 (1970) 257 La. 1 In re Judge Edward A. HAGGERTY, Jr. No. 50667. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 23, 1970. Rehearing Denied December 14, 1970. *470 Robert E. LeCorgne, Jr., New Orleans, Chief Executive Officer, for The Judiciary Commission of Louisiana. Robert J. Zibilich,

129 B.R. 710 (1991) In re JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York. In re JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bernadine K. FINDLEY, as Executrix of the Estate of Hilliard Findley, Uma Lail Caldwell, as Executrix of the Estate of Odell Caldwell, Edward Lindley, Joseph C. Jones and James William Barnette, Jr., on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHAMSHER SINGH, No. 20-72806 Petitioner, Agency No. A215-906-373 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER AND General, AMENDED OPINION Re

Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), in evaluating an employer’s claim that it had a reasonable basis for doubting a union’s majority support, must presume that striker replacements oppose the union. We hold that the Board acted within its discretion in refusing to adopt a presumption of repla

OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: 33 U.S.C. § 903(c) precludes compensation to an injured employee if “the injury was occasioned solely by [his] intoxication.” This language precludes recovery where the intoxication of the employee was the sole “legal cause” of the injury. “Legal cause” is the causal connection in fact, which extends not only to posi

HANSON, Senior District Judge. This case is before the Court on the petition of Truman Medical Center, Inc. (TMC) for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and on the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of the same order. The Board found that TMC violated §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and 158(a)(5), b

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. In 1989, the plaintiffs in these consolidated cases entered into contracts with the United States by which they agreed to acquire failing thrifts insured by the government. In exchange, the parties contemplated that the plaintiffs would receive certain financial benefits, including favorable tax treatment. Congress subsequently became disenchanted with the

*1221 CLARK, Chief Judge: 1 Baker Manufacturing Company (the Company) petitions this court to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board compelling remedial measures for unfair labor pr

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2142 SANDOR DEMKOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ST. ANDREW THE APOSTLE PARISH, CALUMET CITY, and THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal fro