Cases

Aff. Cir. Ct. (Miami-Dade)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Custody of ) No. 78933-3-I A.T. and ST., Children. ) ) MICHAEL TEPPER, ) Appellant,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 158 EAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEALDenied.

Petition for Leave to Appeal Denied.

FLYNN, J. pro tempore Respondent appeals from the trial court’s entry of a stalking protective order (SPO) pursuant to ORS 30.866(1).1 Respondent argues that the trial court erred when it granted the order because the evidence does not permit a finding that respondent engaged in “repeated and unwanted contact” that meets the requirements for issuance of an SPO. We agree with respondent and, accordi

Affirmed Rut. Civ. 122/1216

*1201 Opinion PERLUSS, P. J. Belinda Wilkins Tepper sued her three siblings, Geoffrey Wilkins, Martha Wilkins and Derek Wilkins, on behalf of her 88-year-old mother, Eileen Wilkins, claiming her siblings’ actions individually and while serving as trustees of Eileen’s

Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 1810, Sept. Term, 2014).

App.dism.

Reargument denied Rut. Civ. 125/904

Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity Appellate Court of this document

AMBRO, Circuit Judge Many would gladly pay Tuesday for a hamburger today. Of course, not all of those who fall into debt make payments timely, and debt collection has become a professional trade. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the "FDCPA" or "Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692

In a proceeding to enforce a money judgment, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Markey, J.), dated July 17, 2008, which denied his motion for leave to enter a money judgment against the respondent. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The petitioner commenced this proceeding in an attempt to collect from the respondent a money judgment which the petitioner allegedly ob

966 N.E.2d 607 (2008) 381 Ill. App.3d 1144 359 Ill. Dec. 286 TEPPER v. STOLLER. No. 1-06-3581. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. April 14, 2008. Dism. in pt., aff'd in pt.

616 F.3d 583 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Ernest TEPPER, Appellant. No. 08-3115. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Submitted January 15, 2010. Decided August 6, 2010. *584 A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, and Mary Manning Petras, Assistant Federal Public Defender,

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0420p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, -

897 N.E.2d 264 (2008) 229 Ill.2d 660 TEPPER v. STOLLER. No. 106391. Supreme Court of Illinois. September Term, 2008. Disposition of petition for leave to appeal.[*] Denied. NOTES [*] For Cumulative Leave to Appeal Tables see preliminary pages of advance sheets and Annual Illinois Cumulative Leave to Appeal Table.</

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered November 20, 2008, which, in an action for medical malpractice, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant-appellant’s motion to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations permitting informal, ex parte interviews with plaintiffs’ health care providers, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The motion court incorr

Disposition: Denied.