Cases

126 Cal.Rptr.2d 560 (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1388 Ronald GALLIMORE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants and Respondents. Nos. B147937, B156219. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three. October 22, 2002. Review Denied January 29, 2003.

TYSON, Judge. Defendant, E.B. Davis Electric Company (“Davis Electric”), contracted with Pembroke State University to serve as electrical contractor for construction of a new building. Davis Electric hired Mr. Junius Burney (“Burney”) as a subcontractor for this project. Davis Electric failed to secure a certificate of compliance or written waiver regarding workers’ compensation coverage from Burney. Plaint

333 F.Supp.2d 6 (2004) Ana Cordero HERNANDEZ, et al. Plaintiffs v. Maria Teresa Hernandez BALLESTEROS, et als. Defendants No. CIV. 01-2194(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 31, 2004. *7 *8 *9 Alexander Zeno, San Juan, PR, for Ana M.

[Cite as Veller v. K.B., 2025-Ohio-687.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY Giselle Veller, Administrator of the Court of Appeals No. WD-24-026 Estate of Ashton Copeland, et al. Appellees Trial Court No. 2022 CV 0320 v. K.B., a minor, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Defendants

ORDER AND OPINION Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for a new trial or a judgment of acquittal. (Dkt. No. 916.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion. I. Background On July 22, 2015, a federal grand jury returned a 33-count indictment charging Defendant Dylann Roof wit

ORDER AND OPINION Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment (Dkt. No. 233). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion. I. Background On the evening of June 17, 2015, the Reverend dementa Pinckney led a Bible study group at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal C

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

SCHWELB, Associate Judge, with whom Associate Judge FERREN and Senior Judge MACK join, and with whom Associate Judge REID joins as to Parts II, III and IV, concurring: Linda Carl claims that Children’s Hospital discharged her because she had testified before the Council of the District of Columbia in opposition to tort reform legislation and because she had appeared as an expert witness on behalf of plaint

364 S.E.2d 444 (1988) Elizabeth BLOW, et al., v. Jeffrey John SHAUGHNESSY et al. No. 8710SC153. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 2, 1988. *446 Harrell & Wright by Bernard A. Harrell and I. Clark Wright, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellants. Hunton & Williams by David Dreifus and James E. Farnham, Ral

456 S.E.2d 789 (1995) 340 N.C. 119 STATE of North Carolina v. George Douglas LARRIMORE. No. 241A93. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 5, 1995. *796 Michael F. Easley, Atty. Gen. by Mary Jill Ledford, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. Thomas F. Loflin, III, Durham, for defendant-appellant. W