Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Terri Lynn Massie”
239 F.3d 456 (2nd Cir. 2001) MARK ABDU BRISSON, RONALD H. BUCHNER, GORDON BURGESS, ROBERT BURKE, THOMAS D. CALLAHAN, THOMAS F. CAREY, DALE E. CARMAN, LOUIS CARRARA, T. BARRY CASEY, LAMAR CASON, ROBERT T. CASSIDY, ROBERT CHANGERY, LARRY E. CHAPPEL, RICHARD CHARBONNEAU, STANLEY CHECKOWAY, DOUGLAS S. CHRISTENSEN, LEE J. CHURCH, JAMES CIRILLI, ROBERT CLACK, WALTER M. CLARK, PHILIP CLAUDY, HAROLD T. CLEAVER, CHARLES CLEMENTS, RICHARD T. CLOUGH, LAWRENCE
Young v. Vista Homes, Inc.public domain
243 S.W.3d 352 (2007) Terry A. YOUNG and Lynn Y. Young, Appellants, v. VISTA HOMES, INC.; Re/Max Executive Group, Inc.; James E. Bramblett; and Fred Bramblett, Appellees. and Vista Homes, Inc., Cross-Appellant, v. Terry A. Young and Lynn Y. Young, Cross-Appellees. and Vista Homes, Inc., Appellant, v. Bernard Prevost, Jr.; Danielle Prevost; Randall H. Roller; Laura A. Roller; Dean Moreland; Katy Moreland; Willard Suther; Mi
Pucciariello v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BUSH, Senior Judge. Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). That motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Landpublic domain
PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: In October 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved the application of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, to construct a natural gas pipeline through West Virginia and Virginia. Building and maintaining that pipeline would require access to thousands of private properties, under which the pipeline would be buried. Accordingly, the Commission's approval permits Mountain Valley to obtain
Stamps v. Town of Framinghampublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAYLOR, District Judge. This is a civil rights action arising out of the shooting of an individual during the execution of a search warrant. On January 5, 2011, Eurie Stamps, Sr., was shot and killed in his home by defendant Paul Duncan, an officer of the Framingham Police Department. Plaintiffs Eurie Stamps, Jr., and Norma Stamps a
OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY In the circuit court, two property owners' associations ("POAs") sued various owners and developers of parcels in the Hollymead Town Center ("HTC"), a shopping center, claiming that HTC's sediment basins discharged sediment into a creek that flowed into a lake owned by the POAs. The POAs sought damages and injunctive relief. Holding that the incursio
Morales v. Tiltonpublic domain
465 F.Supp.2d 972 (2006) Michael Angelo MORALES, Plaintiff, v. James E. TILTON, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and Robert L. Ayers Jr., Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Defendants. Nos. C 06 219 JF RS, C 06 926 JF RS. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 15, 2006.
Martino v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.public domain
908 So.2d 342 (2005) Ronna MARTINO, et al., Petitioners, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondent. No. SC03-334. Supreme Court of Florida. July 7, 2005. Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn and Compiani, P.A., and Steven *343 W. Halvorson of Schuler and Halvorson, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner. Rosemary
United States v. Hudsonpublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The United States appeals an order of the district court suppressing certain statements made by Peter Hudson and Tammy Riness to agents of the United States Border Patrol. The district court suppressed the statements on the ground that they were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of Landpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1159 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. 6.56 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY SANDRA TOWNES POWELL, Montgomery County Tax Map Parcel No. 015900 and being MVP Parcel No. VA-MO-3370; 1.81 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY ROBERT M. JONES AND DONNA THOMAS JONES, Montgomery County
State v. Clarkpublic domain
OPINION SERNA, Justice. {1} Defendant Terry Clark appeals his sentence of death for the murder of nine-year-old Dena Lynn Gore, pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 31-20A-4(A) (1979), which states that “[t]he judgment of conviction and sentence of death shall be automatically reviewed by the [Sjupreme [Cjourt of the state of New Mexico.” Clark raises numerous issues r
People v. Coffmanpublic domain
17 Cal.Rptr.3d 710 (2004) 96 P.3d 30 34 Cal.4th 1 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Cynthia Lynn COFFMAN and James Gregory Marlow, Defendants and Appellants. No. S011960. Supreme Court of California. August 19, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 27, 2004. Certiorari Denied May
Harris v. Championpublic domain
51 F.3d 901 Anthony Jerome HARRIS, Gary Middaugh, Theodore Ford, DoyleKing, Randy Meyer, Terry Crisp, Michael Farmer, JohnHoneycutt, Coy Hill, Troy Brown, Deems Rowell, GordonBunton, Adam Wright, Robert Manous, Kimball Foreman, JoeHeadrick, Terry Steward, Arthur Blackmon, James Smith,Stephen Ross, Johnny Smith, Larry Brown, Walter Robinson,Roger Williams, Kenneth Owens, Marshall Gee, Kelly Craig,Gilbert Payne, Danny Gree
Cleland v. City of Lake Charlespublic domain
840 So.2d 686 (2003) Terry and Ruth CLELAND v. CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, et al. Terry and Ruth Cleland v. City of Lake Charles, et al. Nos. 02-805, 01-1463. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 5, 2003. Rehearing Denied April 16, 2003. *688 John Bradford, Todd Ammons, Stockwell, Sievert, Vic
128 F.3d 77 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1849,73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,289Mark ABDU-BRISSON; Ronald H. Buchner; Gordon Burgess;Robert Burke; Thomas D. Callahan; Thomas F. Carey; DaleE. Carman; Louis Carrara; T. Barry Casey; Lamar Cason;Robert T. Cassidy; Robert Changery; Larry E. Chappel;Richard Charbonneau; Stanley Checkoway; Douglas S.Christensen; Lee J. Church; James Cirilli; Robert Clack;Walter M.
Christopher C. v. Kay C.public domain
228 Cal.App.3d 741 (1991) 278 Cal. Rptr. 907 Adoption of KAY C., a Minor. CHRISTOPHER C. et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. KAY C., Objector and Appellant; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Docket No. H006084. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. March 18, 1991.
In re Suspensions of Att'yspublic domain
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS RANDALL T. SHEPARD, Chief Justice. The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be lieensed to practice law in Indiana, or to file an exemption affidavit as contem
In Re Failure to Complypublic domain
909 N.E.2d 415 (2009) In the Matter of FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS and/or NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES. No. 94S00-0905-MS-210. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 5, 2009. ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIRE