Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: Roy Terry Bennett appeals from a sentence imposed by the district court. He contends that the district court erred in sentencing him as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and in assuming that the cocaine base involved in his offense was crack cocaine. Bennett also claims th

127 F.3d 1097 U.S.v.Roy Terry Bennett NO. 97-1083 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Aug 26, 1997 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.95353 , Dalzell, J. 1 Affirmed.

KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Judge. ¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Terry Bennett and Wardice White (collectively, Buyers) appeal from the trial court's order denying their motion to vacate the trial court's earlier order compelling arbitration of Buyers' suit against Defendants/Appellees Eskridge Auto Group, Michael Milligan, Brian Pendarvis, Rudy Doss, and Jeffrey Shahan (collectively, Selle

Petition denied by'unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry Jackson Bennett petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district cour

PER CURIAM: Terry Jackson Bennett petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 motion that he filed following the denial of his 28 *262U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. Bennett seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus

ORDER1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Forest Laboratories, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.# 74) filed on January 5, 2015. Brett A. Bennett filed a response in opposition on January SO, 2015. (Doc.# 89). Forest Laboratories filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority on April 7, 2015. (Doc.# 155). Bennett filed a Notice of

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered May 19, 2006. The order, among other things, awarded judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff for maintenance arrears. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation to withdraw appeal and the addendum to and stipulation to withdraw appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 16, 2007, It i

10/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 1, 2020 Session TERRY WALLACE V. CITY OF LEWISBURG, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 11-CV-80 Franklin L. Russell, Judge

PER CURIAM: Terry Jackson Bennett seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), entered September 4, 2003. The order, among other things, awarded maintenance to defendant and distributed the marital property. *1081It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion to the extent

993 A.2d 765 (2010) Douglas C. BEER v. Terry M. BENNETT. No. 2008-808. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: January 13, 2010. Opinion Issued: April 20, 2010. *766 Keane & Macdonald, P.C., of Portsmouth (Douglas W. Macdonald, on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff. Douglas, Leonard & Garvey,

Dalianis, J. The plaintiff, Terry Bennett, appeals the Trial Court (T. Nadeau, J.) order granting summary judgment to the defendants, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and ITT Hartford Group, Inc. (Hartford), on his breach of good faith and fair dealing claim. Bennett also appeals the trial court order denying his motions for voluntary nonsuit without prejudice and to amend his writ. Hart

AMY, Judge. |,The plaintiff filed suit seeking partition of property she asserts she inherited from her mother. Defendants filed an exception of no right of action, alleging that the property was the separate property of one of the defendants and that the plaintiff therefore had no interest in it. After a hearing on the exception, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the defendant and awarded attorney fees. The plainti

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. ^Defendant, Shedriek Bennett, appeals his convictions and sentences for battery of a correctional officer. For the reasons that follow, we affirm defendant’s convictions, affirm defendant’s sentences' on *255counts two and three, and amend defendant’s sentence on count one. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 23, 2014 Session TERRY MORRISON, ET AL. v. RICHARD HUBBELL Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 090133I Claudia Bonnyman, Chancellor No. M2013-00822-COA-R3-CV- Filed February 11, 2014 Landlords filed suit against a tenant for breach of the rental contract. The trial co

BRODERICK, C.J. The plaintiff, Terry Bennett, appeals the order of an insurance department hearing officer dismissing, without prejudice, a notice of hearing issued by the insurance commissioner. We reverse and remand. The record supports the following facts. On June 16, 1993, the plaintiff contracted with United Risk Management (URM) for an ITT Hartford Group, Inc. homeowner’s insurance policy in the face amo

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Adam Musser was convicted in four separate trials of criminally transmitting the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in violation of Iowa Code § 709C.1. Following the same number of unsuccessful appeals before the Iowa Supreme Court, Musser petitioned for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court

235 P.3d 1037 (2010) Michael McCLUNG, a citizen and qualified elector in the State of Arizona, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hon. Ken BENNETT, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, Hon. Helen Purcell, in her official capacity as Maricopa County Recorder, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in their official capacity, Hon. Laura Dean-Lytle in her official capacity as Pinal County Recorder, Pinal County Board of Supervisors in their of

907 N.E.2d 529 (2009) Kevin D. BURKE, Appellant-Cross-Appellee (Petitioner below), v. Duke BENNETT, Appellee-Cross-Appellant (Contestee below). No. 84S01-0904-CV-148. Supreme Court of Indiana. June 16, 2009. *530 Edward O. DeLaney, Amanda Couture, DeLaney & DeLaney LLC, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant/Cross-Appellee

HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice, concurring. ¶ 20 In Arizona Together v. Brewer, this Court “clear[ed] out a considerable amount of our jurisprudential underbrush” concerning Article 21, Section 1. 214 Ariz. 118, 127 ¶ 31, 149 P.3d 742, 751 (2007) (Hurwitz, J., concurring). Today’s opinion faithfully applies Arizona Together. I write separately because, as in Arizona Together,