Cases

BOGGS, Justice. Appellant Michael Terry pled guilty to several charges in connection with the murder of his wife.1 He files this pro se out-of-time appeal asserting that he received ineffective assistance of appellate *777counsel and that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea. For the following reasons, we aff

*731 OPINION NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Respondent-Appellant Terry Collins, Warden of the Warren Correctional Institute in Lebanon, Ohio, appeals the district court’s grant of Petitioner-Appellee Roger P. Boggs’s § 2254 habeas petition. For the reasons stated herein, we REV

ORDER VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief Judge. Before the Court are plaintiff Debra Boggs’ (“Boggs”) Motion and Brief for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(g), filed June 25, 2012; plaintiff William Isaac Bryant Casto’s (“Casto”) Motion for Entry of Pretrial Order No. 1 Consolidating Cases, Appointing Interim Class Counsel, and Establishing Procedures for Consolidation

185 P.3d 111 (2008) STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Steve Alan BOGGS, Appellant. No. CR-05-0174-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. June 16, 2008. *115 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section, Jeffrey A. Zick, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for State

Case below, 980 N.E.2d 363.Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District, denied.

Boggs, Judge. This appeal involves a controversy over surface water runoff between adjoining property owners. John Terry and Karen Correnty (“plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Leigh Catherall and Edie and Gillespie Smith (collectively “defendants”). The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in concluding that they had

DISSENT BOGGS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Domestic violence has been, and continues to be, a serious problem in this country. The question before this court, however, is not whether the government has a compelling interest in curbing the incidence of domestic firearm violence. We all agree that it does. Nor is it whether the governme

Rickman, Judge. Appellants Worthwhile Investments, LLC (“WI”), and Gary Johnson appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Terry Higgins and against WI and Johnson on Higgins’s claim for conversion. WI and Johnson assert that the trial court erred in holding that WI, the holder of a security deed which encumbered Higgins’s property sold at a tax sale, lost it

OPINION BROWN, Judge. This is a consolidated appeal from various proceedings in which the West Boggs Sewer District (“West Boggs”) brought complaints against Terry and Laura Wag-ler (“Terry & Laura”), Larry and Jennifer Wagler (“Larry & Jennifer”), and Norman Wagler (collectively, the “Waglers”), as well as Janet and Nathan Wagler (“Janet & N

522 F.3d 645 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent TERRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3757. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 17, 2008. Decided and Filed: April 15, 2008. *646 ARGUED: Richard W. Smith-Monahan, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Cincinnati, Oh

PER CURIAM: In this original proceeding in mandamus, the petitioner, James Glover, seeks to compel the respondent, Andrew Richardson, Commissioner of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Fund, to pay petitioner, as executor of decedent Charles S. Glover’s estate, $144,098.75. Petitioner also seeks attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner contends that the amount claimed is owed petitioner by virtue of respondent’s underpayment

WIDENER, Circuit Judge: This is a case in which Richard T. Boggs was sentenced to death for the capital murder of Mrs. Treeby Shaw, a neighbor of Boggs. After his conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal, Boggs sought habeas corpus relief in the state courts, which was denied. He then filed a petition for habeas corpus relief in the federal district court. The district court denied habeas corpus

695 F.Supp. 864 (1988) Richard Thomas BOGGS, Petitioner, v. Toni V. BAIR, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center; Edward Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; and Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents. Civ. A. No. 88-0360-R. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. September 26, 1988.

[Cite as In re Estate of Boggs v. Todd, 2025-Ohio-1947.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: ESTATE OF : DOROTHY K. BOGGS : : C.A. No. 2024-CA-23 RUBY ANN SOWRY, EXECUTOR

ORDER Allen Corey Terry petitions the court to rehear en banc its order denying him a certificate of appealability and in forma pauperis status in his appeal from a district court judgment denying his motion to vacate his sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *990 Subseque

892 F.2d 1193 Richard T. BOGGS, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Toni V. BAIR, Warden; Edward W. Murray, Director; Mary SueTerry, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellants.Richard T. BOGGS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Toni V. BAIR, Warden; Edward W. Murray, Director; Mary SueTerry, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. Nos. 88-4010, 88-4012. United States Court of Appeals,Four

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Terry D. Walton appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendanb-Appellee Visteon Corporation (“Visteon”) on Walton’s claim that Visteon interfered with his attempt to exercise his rights under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”) by terminating him in violation of

*632 OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Terry C. and David A. Gold-meier (the “Goldmeiers”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), their former employer, in their action for religious discrimination, in viol

386 N.E.2d 992 (1979) George BOGGS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 1-1077 A 235. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. March 19, 1979. James M. Backmeyer, William C. Hoelscher, Richmond, for appellant. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Terry G. Duga, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

*480 OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge. Congress has presented this court with yet another challenge in interpreting the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (codified, inter alia, at 28 U.S.C. § 2244 et seq.).