Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Terry L. Carr”
Terry v. Statepublic domain
BOGGS, Justice. Appellant Michael Terry pled guilty to several charges in connection with the murder of his wife.1 He files this pro se out-of-time appeal asserting that he received ineffective assistance of appellate *777counsel and that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea. For the following reasons, we aff
United States v. Terry C. Carr and Mark Todd Carrpublic domain
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the district court’s judgment sentencing defendants-appellees Terry C. Carr and her husband Mark Todd Carr. The government argues that the district court’s downward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines’ range was improper. The Carrs pled guilty to charges of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1341,
United States v. Carrpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT MATHEWS, Judge: The appellant stands convicted of one specification of absence without leave, terminated by apprehension, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 886; one specification of dereliction of duty, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892; and seven specifications of indecent assault, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The appellant pled guil
Carr v. Carrpublic domain
Appeal No. 14032 from Judgment dated May 8,1992; John C. Ross Jr. Ruling Judge, Prentiss County Chancery Court. Before PRATHER, P.J., and BANKS and McRAE, JJ. Affirmed.
Carr v. Carrpublic domain
701 P.2d 304 (1985) 108 Idaho 684 Elizabeth Mary CARR, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terry Arthur CARR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 15177. Court of Appeals of Idaho. May 31, 1985. *306 C.J. Hamilton (argued), Hamilton & Hamilton, Steve F. Bell, Coeur d'Alene, for defendant-appellant. Sue S. Flammia (arg
People v. Carrpublic domain
Opinion by JUDGE BERGER ¶ 1 A jury convicted defendant, Tio Everette Can*, of possession of a schedule II controlled substance with the intent to distribute and obstructing government operations. His sole contention on appeal is that the non-consensual search of his mouth, during which the police discovered unlawful drugs, violated the Fourth Amend
Stacey Sellers v. Terry L. Morris, Superintendent of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facilitypublic domain
840 F.2d 352 Stacey SELLERS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Terry L. MORRIS, Superintendent of the Southern OhioCorrectional Facility, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-3851. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Oct. 19, 1987.Decided Feb. 26, 1988. Stacey Sellers, pro se.
United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)public domain
*835 AMENDED OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. A 10-count indictment charged William Anthony Johnson and Christopher L. Stone, among others, with various violations of federal law, including the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), conspiracy to violat
Terry-Hall v. Statepublic domain
312 Ga. 250 FINAL COPY S21A0790. TERRY-HALL v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Justice. Brandon Terry-Hall, who pleaded guilty to felony murder and other offenses, appeals the denial of his motion for an out-of-time appeal. He raises two arguments on appeal: (1) he argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to appeal or move to withdraw his guilty plea, and (2) he challenges the factual basis for his guilty plea in various ways. But Terry-Hall failed to raise below the
United States v. William Anthony Johnson (04-5110/6161) and Christopher L. Stone (04-5146)public domain
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. A 10-count indictment charged William Anthony Johnson and Christopher L. Stone, among others, with various violations of federal law, including the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), conspiracy to violate RICO, and fraud. Stone was tried before a jury and convicted of violating RICO and of conspiring to
State v. Carrpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Carr, 2020-Ohio-1523.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case Nos. 27960 and 28080 : v.
Terry Ray Lord v. State of Iowapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0065 Filed January 23, 2025 TERRY RAY LORD, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge. An applicant for postconviction relief appeals the dismissal of his application as time-barred.
State v. Carrpublic domain
No. 116,228 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RALFEAL ERON CARR, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitut
United States v. Carrpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Defendant Winston Nicholas Carr is charged in a two-count indictment with importation of cocaine in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 952(a), 960(a)(1) and 960(b)(l)(B)(ii), and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(A)(ii)(II). On Jan
780 F.2d 894 13 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 121, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,635In re Ben W. TERRY, et al., Debtors.FOSTER MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Ben Watt TERRY and Cheryl Eileen Terry, Defendants-Appellees.In re Willie J. BIBBS, Debtor.F & M MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Willie J. BIBBS, Defendant-Appellee.In re E.Z. CARR, Debtor.FIRST FAMILY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant
People v. Carrpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Carr, 2013 IL App (3d) 110894 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption KENT CARR, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Third District Docket No. 3-11-0894 Filed June 24, 2013 Rehearing denied July 2
O.W. v. Marie Carrpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1288 Doc: 95 Filed: 04/09/2026 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1288 O.W., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARIE L. CARR, police officer in her individual and offic
United States v. Carrpublic domain
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The factual record developed by the district court on remand essentially affirmed that previously presented to this court for review. Accordingly, the conclusion I previously expressed in concurrence remains unchanged: The encounter between Carr and the police officers was neither consensual nor supported by reasonable suspicion and, consequently, was in violatio
State v. Carrpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Carr, 2011-Ohio-2061.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 24004 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 09-CR-3281 v.
Terry v. Terrypublic domain
954 So.2d 790 (2007) Eugene John TERRY v. Wilma Jane TERRY, Born Jones. No. CA 06-1406. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 28, 2007. *791 Kathleen Kay, Attorney at Law, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Eugene John Terry. *792 Anne Elizabeth Watson, Dupre & W