⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Test-Case v. Test”

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019-02-15 · Published · cited 4× · 367 F. Supp. 3d 350
II A The Declaratory Judgment Act provides in pertinent part: In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction ... any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought.
District Court, D. Maine · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 333 F. Supp. 3d 891
Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Uhura Russ's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 430] is GRANTED . 2. Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Transfer [Docket No. 437] is DENIED . 3. The present action is DISMISSED . <
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2025-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) The Test for Determining “Officer” Status Under the Appointments Clause Individuals must be appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause only if they (1) occupy a continuing position that is part of the federal government for constitutional purposes, and (2) exercise significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. January 16, 2025 MEMORANDUM O
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Communication Test Design, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers’ Compensation : Appeal Board (Simpson), : No. 1196 C.D. 2019 Respondent : Submitted: January 17, 2020 BEFORE: HONORABLE RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, Judge H
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-03-13 · Published · cited 30× · 952 F.3d 1356
Case: 19-1672 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ COMMUNICATIONS TEST DESIGN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. CONTEC, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1672 ______________________ Appeal from the United S
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2020-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 TN WC 134
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Medhat Said, ) Docket No. 2018-06-0433 Employee, ) Vv. ) Communications Test Design, Inc., ) State File No. 60229-2019 Employer, ) And ) Zurich American Insurance Company, ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. ) COMPENSATION ORDER The threshold issue in this case is the compensability of Medhat Said’s claim regarding a gradual injury he suffered while working for Communications Test
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2025-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) The Test for Determining “Officer” Status Under the Appointments Clause Individuals must be appointed pursuant to the Appointments Clause only if they (1) occupy a continuing position that is part of the federal government for constitutional purposes, and (2) exercise significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. January 16, 2025 MEMORANDUM O
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2019-12-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 TN WC 180
FILED Dec 16, 2019 01:52 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Medhat Said, ) Docket No. 2018-06-0433 Employee, ) V. ) Communications Test Design, Inc., ) State File No. 60229-2019 Employer, ) And ) Zurich American Ins. Co., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER Medhat Said alleged he suffered a cumulative trauma injury while working for Co
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020-08-19 · Published · cited 5× · 971 F.3d 747
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3197 ___________________________ East Coast Test Prep LLC, doing business as Achieve Test Prep; Mark Olynyk lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Allnurses.com, Inc.; David R. Smits, as Administra
Test v. Holderpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-05-15 · Published · cited 16× · 614 F. Supp. 2d 73; 22 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 307; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41311; 2009 WL 1353721
614 F.Supp.2d 73 (2009) Jeffrey T. TEST, Plaintiff, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Attorney General,[1] Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-0225 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 15, 2009. *75 Madeha Chaudry Dastgir, Myrrel C. Hendricks, Gebhardt & Associates, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 31× · 226 N.J. 166; 140 A.3d 1268; 2016 N.J. LEXIS 722
Justice PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal arises from a conflict among the three members of IE Test, LLC (IE Test), an engineering consultant business *170 formed as a limited liability company (LLC). In the wake of a dispute about the terms of an operati
Test v. Gonzalespublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY T. TEST, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-0225 (JDB) ERIC H. HOLDER, Attorney General,1 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Jeffrey Test, a former employee at the United States Department of Justice, brings this employment discrimination and
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016-03-11 · Published · cited 8× · 335 Ga. App. 761; 782 S.E.2d 848
Ray, Judge. Sondi Moore-Waters, Alphonso Waters, and Family Practice of Atlanta Medical Group, LLC (collectively the “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of Met-Test, LLC’s motion for default judgment against them. On appeal, the Appellants contend that the trial court erred because they were not legally obligated to answer an amended complaint. For the reasons that
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-11-10 · Published · cited 9× · 73 F. Supp. 3d 12; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158686; 2014 WL 5822911
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Jarrod Beck, Erin Galloway, Keerthi Reddy (collectively “plaintiffs”) seek attorneys’ fees and expenses from defendant Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. (“TES”). This Court entered summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs for claims under the D.C. Consumer Protec
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 994 F. Supp. 2d 98; 2014 WL 2803445; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84131
*100 MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ Motion for the Entry of a Monetary Judgment and to Set an Evidentiary Hearing on Plaintiffs’ Request for Injunctive Relief [200], the defendant’s Opposition [2
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 12 F. Supp. 3d 22; 2013 WL 6668736; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177327
MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Before the Court is the defendant’s renewed motion to vacate or reconsider or *23 ders on plaintiffs’ motion to compel and for sanctions. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for sanctions will be
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 125 Fed. Cl. 201; 2016 WL 865310
Post-award bid protest; agency’s reevaluation as part of GAO’s recommended corrective action; implied duty to fairly and honestly consider protestor’s proposal during reevaluation; technical risk factors; cost-price considerations, including price realism;, past performance OPINION AND ORDER 1
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-12-18 · Published · cited 6× · 994 F. Supp. 2d 90; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177332; 2013 WL 6668699
MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Before the Court are the plaintiffs’ motion ([154] and [158]) for summary judgment and the defendant’s cross-motion ( [157] and [159]) for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED, and defendant’s motion for summary judgme
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-04-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ohio 1375
[Cite as Avalon Test Equip. Leasing, Inc. v. Emerald Design Constr., L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-1375.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AVALON TEST EQUIPMENT : LEASING, INC., : Plaintiff-Appellee, :
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2011-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before the Court is Power Test Realty Company Limited Partnership's ("Appellant" or "Power Test") appeal of a decision of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management ("DEM"). The DEM decision sustained a Notice of Violation ("NOV") issued against Appellant for alleged violations of the Rhode Island Oil Pollution Control Act ("OPCA") and the accompanying Oil Pollution Control ("OPC") Regulations. Juri