⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “The Center for Special Needs Trust Administration”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012-04-16 · Published · cited 16× · 676 F.3d 688; 2012 WL 1253280; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7536
676 F.3d 688 (2012) CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST ADMINISTRATION, INC., Appellant, v. Carol K. OLSON, in her official capacity as Executive Director of North Dakota Department of Human Services, Appellee. No. 11-2158. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 16, 2011. Filed: April 16, 2012. *
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0736 Submitted February 22, 2023—Filed April 28, 2023 IN THE MATTER OF THE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE POOLED SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST OF SCOTT HEWITT. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Thomas P. Murphy, Judge. The Iowa Department of Human Services appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of th
District Court, D. North Dakota · 2011-01-06 · Published · cited 1× · 759 F. Supp. 2d 1125; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3053; 2011 WL 37978
759 F.Supp.2d 1125 (2011) NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, State of North Dakota ex rel. Executive Director acting by & through Carol K. Olson, Plaintiff, v. CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST ADMINISTRATION, INC. and Damian J. Huettl, Defendants. Case No. 1:09-CV-077. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. January 6, 2011. <
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0736 Submitted February 22, 2023—Filed April 28, 2023 IN THE MATTER OF THE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE POOLED SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST OF SCOTT HEWITT. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Thomas P. Murphy, Judge. The Iowa Department of Human Services appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of th
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–1331 Submitted February 22, 2023—Filed April 28, 2023 IN THE MATTER OF THE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE POOLED SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST OF STEVEN MULLER. THE CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST ADMINISTRATION, INC., Appellant, vs. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Patrick A. McElyea, Judge. The trustee of a poole
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 3407
Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice Ctr. for The Protection of People With Special Needs (2018 NY Slip Op 03407) Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice Ctr. for The Protection of People With Special Needs 2018 NY Slip Op 03407 Decided on May 10, 2018 A
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025-07-09 · Published · cited 0×
In the Matter of the Boyce Living Trust, No. 1685, September Term 2022. Opinion by Zic, J. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – STATUTE OF REPOSE Pursuant to § 14.5-605 of the Maryland Annotated Code, Estates and Trusts Article, an interested party may challenge the validity of a trust that was revocable at the death of the settlor within the earliest of either one year after the death of the settlor or six months after receiving proper notice of the trust. Section 14.5-605 is a statute of repose, not a st
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 1× · 142 F. Supp. 3d 898; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151216; 2015 WL 6755596
Order on Intervenor-Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss* Order to Show Cause Re* Stay Pending Exhaustion Re: Dkt. No. 58 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Plaintiffs Center for Food Safety, et al., (collectively, “plaintiffs”) bring these cases against defendants United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and Margaret Hamburg, in her Official capacit
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-2622 (ABJ) ) SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 26-5101 September Term, 2025 1:25-cv-04316-RJL Filed On: April 11, 2026 National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United S
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
Regulations of the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board 1.0 Preamble 1.1 Purpose [As a unified body, independent from the judicial conduct structures of the Judicial Conduct Board and Court of Judicial Discipline, t]The Judicial Ethics Advisory Board [(JEAB)] is the designated and approved body to render advice, [and] opinions, and guidance regarding appropriate ethical conduct involving all
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-11-07 · Published · cited 11× · 980 F. Supp. 2d 588; 2013 WL 5943995; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159532
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge. INTRODUCTION...............................................................595 FINDINGS OF FACT...........................................................597 A. Emergency Planning for People with Disabilities............................597 B. The City’s Emergency Planning Structure .......
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, V. TODD T. SEMONITE et ail. Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01361-RCL Defendants and VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenor. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES and ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF VIRGINIA ANTIQUITIES, Plaintiffs, Vv. TODD T. SEMONITE et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01574-RCL Defendants, and VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 5, 2026 Decided August 7, 2026 No. 26-5123 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 26-5134 Appeals from the United States Dist
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 5, 2026 Decided August 7, 2026 No. 26-5123 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 26-5134 Appeals from the United States Dist
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024-12-04 · Published · cited 3× · 704 S.W.3d 134; 2024 Ark. App. 596
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 596 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-533 HEATHER MANOR CARE CENTER, Opinion Delivered December 4, 2024 INC.; AND MICHAEL MORTON APPEAL FROM THE HEMPSTEAD APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 29CV-20-27] V.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-28 · Published · cited 12× · 933 F. Supp. 2d 125; 2013 WL 1248288; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44347
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. • The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) initiated this action against the Secretary of Commerce, 1 the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“Fisheries Service” or “NMFS
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-11-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In the Matter of THE JEREMY ) PARADISE DYNASTY TRUST and ) C.A. No. 2021-0354-KSJM THE ANDREW PARADISE DYNASTY ) TRUST ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: November 16, 2021 Date Decided: November 29, 2021 Luke W. Mette, Jonathan M. Stemerman, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; John
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
Regulations of the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board 1.0 Preamble 1.1 Purpose As a unified body, independent from the judicial conduct structures of the Judicial Conduct Board and Court of Judicial Discipline, the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board (JEAB) is the designated and approved body to render advice and opinions regarding appropriate ethical conduct involving all judicial officers and
Pendergraft v. C.H.public domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 254 So. 3d 417
AFFIRMED.