Cases

[Cite as Connor Group v. Raney, 2016-Ohio-2959.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY CONNOR GROUP, A REAL ESTATE : INVESTMENT FIRM, LLC, et al. : : C.A. CASE NO. 26653 Plaintiffs-Appellees : :

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 18-P-177 Appeals Court 18-P-178 DANIEL J. O

JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs sold their company to the Defendants' company. A purchasing agreement memorialized the transaction. Plaintiffs bring claims for securities fraud and common-law fraud against Defendants based on alleged misrepresentations in this Agreement. Defendants now move for summary judgment on a number of grounds. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motions because (1) Plaintiffs

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0227p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SOFCO ERECTORS, INC., ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PATIENT DEPOT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellant, v. ACADIA ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation, RYAN O’CONNOR, and LORI ANN O’CONNOR, Appellees. No. 4D21-1934 [April 26, 2023] Appeal from

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE ) COMPANY a/s/o GREEN RECOVERY ) TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) THE COMMONWEALTH GROUP ) LTD and THE COMMONWEALTH ) GROUP LLC, ) De

CHIN, J. *828 *1030 We granted review to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal over whether the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA) ( Civ. Code, § 1786 et seq. )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER GARNIER; KIMBERLY Nos. 21-55118 GARNIER, 21-55157 Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02215- v. BEN-JLB MICHELLE O’CONNOR-RATCLIFF; T.J. ZANE, OPINION Defen

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 21-2258 ____________ ADAM POTTER; MOXIE HC LLC, Appellants v. COZEN & O'CONNOR; ANNE BLUME, Esquire; ANNE M. MADONIA, Esquire ____________ On Appeal from the United State

BARRON, Circuit Judge. For want of a comma, we have this case. It arises from a dispute between a Maine dairy company and its delivery drivers, and it concerns the scope of an exemption from Maine’s overtime law. 26 M.R.S.A. § 664(3). Specifically, if that exemption used a serial comma to mark off the last of the activities that it lists, then the exemption would clearly encompass

BEA, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and O’SCANNLAIN, GOULD, TALLMAN, CALLAHAN, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges: The panel majority — over a vigorous dissent by Chief Judge Restani of the Court *846of International Trade — extends and grants a Bivens

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INSPIRED DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant MITCHELL PRINE, INDIVIDUALLY, Counterclaim Defendant v. INSPIRED PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DBA KIDSEMBRACE, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL O’Connor, Docket No. 518 Yucesoy, Docket No. 206 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I- INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs brought the instant class action and putative class action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., alleging that Uber miselassifies drivers as inde

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Douglas O’Connor, Thomas Colopy Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel are current or former drivers who have performed services for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. Docket No. 330 (Second Amended Complaint) (SAC).

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the latest in a series of lawsuits by opponents of a proposed off-shore wind power generation facility in Nantucket Sound. Plaintiffs — who include the Town of Barnstable, a nonprofit advocacy group named Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, and businesses and individuals residing near the proposed facility

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ASHLEY POPA, individually and on No. 24-14 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00294- Plaintiff - Appellant, JLR v. OPINION MICROSOFT CORPO

DUNCAN, P. J. In this consolidated appeal, the relator, Kip O’Connor, appeals judgments in two mandamus cases that arose out of a dispute between O’Connor and Clackamas County about development permits relating to a rock revetment (commonly referred to as a retaining wall or rip-rap) along the Sandy River. In the first mandamus action (“the permit case”) (A152148), O’Connor sought to compel the county to issue a floodplain dev

OPINION OF THE COURT HILL, Circuit Judge. Green Machine Corporation appeals the entry of summary judgment against it on the issue of Zurich-American Insurance Group’s duty to defend and indemnify it in an underlying patent infringement action. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. In 1995, Chiuminatta

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0107p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; SCOTT D. │ MEADE; DANIEL RANGER; MICHAEL

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1778/23-1790/23-1808/23-1984/23-2544/ 23-2559/23-2560/23-2612 PJM POWER PROVIDERS GROUP, Petitioner in 23-1778/23-2612 v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION _____________ CONSTELLATION ENERGY GENERATION LLC, Petitioner in 23-1790/23-2544