Cases

July 25, 2023 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 9 347 Conn. 317 JULY, 2023 317 High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. v. Dept. of Public Health HIGH WATCH RECOVERY CENTER, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ET AL. (SC 20666) Robinson, C. J., and McDonal

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

26 B.R. 77 (1982) In re PDQ COPY CENTER, INC. d/b/a White Plains Lithographic Co., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 82-B-20343, Adv. No. 82ADV6134. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. December 23, 1982. Sidney Turner, White Plains, N.Y., for trustee. *78 John S. Martin, Jr., U.S. Atty. for the S.D.N.Y., New York City, for the Uni

MORENO, J. I concur in the majority’s narrow holding, which, as I understand it, is that the First Amendment does not categorically prohibit preliminary injunctions to enjoin the publication of trade secrets. I further agree that the First Amendment requires independent appellate review of such preliminary injunctions, rather than the deferential review usually accorded such inju

DENIED and Opinion Filed December 22, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01297-CV IN RE STRUGE CULTURAL CENTER, INC., Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-06879-E MEMO

NAHMIAS, Justice. Georgia law gives a hospital a lien for the reasonable charges for its care and treatment of an injured person against all causes of action accruing to that person on account of her injuries, and establishes a process for the hospital to perfect its lien for the amount claimed to be due. See OCGA §§ 44-14-470, 44-14-471. The Medical Center, Inc. (TMC) provided h

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion Filed October 15, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01134-CV ALBANIAN-AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER, INC. AND XHAMIA SHQIPTARE DFW, INC., Appellants V. STRUGE CULTURAL CENTER, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

318 Ga. 271 FINAL COPY S24A0309. FIRST CENTER, INC. et al. v. COBB COUNTY et al. BETHEL, Justice. This dispute between the parties stems from a disagreement about the applicable rules dictating the height of a wall surrounding a subdivision that is under development. Appellants brought suit against Cobb County, County Commissioner JoAnn K. Birrell in her official capacity, and Zoning Division Manager John Pederson in his official capacity, setting forth numerous counts, inclu

HIGH WATCH RECOVERY CENTER, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ET AL. (SC 21107) Mullins, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff, a substance abuse treatment facility, appealed from the judg- ment of the trial court, which had dismissed the plaintiff’s administrative appeal from the decision of the named defendant

WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Gertrude Brooks failed to respond to requests for admissions served by the defendant, The Landmark Nursing Center Inc. (Landmark), within the time allowed by Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a). Thus, pursuant to Rule 36(a), Landmark’s requests were deemed admitted. Even after Landmark filed a motion for summary judgmen

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cou

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 26-JUN-2023 08:46 AM Dkt. 83 MO

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, January 19, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0105. AU MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. DOROTHY DALE, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN DALE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State

05/30/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 17, 2025 Session DR. DAVID BRUCE COFFEY v. BUCKEYE HOME HEALTH CENTER, INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Scott County No. 9452 John D. McAfee, Judge _

297 Ga. 285 FINAL COPY S14G1632. BOWDEN v. THE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. NAHMIAS, Justice. Georgia law gives a hospital a lien for the reasonable charges for its care and treatment of an injured person against all causes of action accruing to that person on account of her injuries, and establishes a process for the hospital to perfect its lien for the amount claimed to be due. See OCGA §§ 44-14-470, 44- 14-471. The Medical Center, Inc. (TMC) provided hospital care to Danie

#30697, #30705-aff in pt & rev in pt-MES 2025 S.D. 34 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** LORI A. OLSON, Individually and as the personal representative of the ESTATE OF SCOTT D. OLSON, a deceased person, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HURON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., WILLIAM J. MINER, M.D., and THOMAS MINE

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Premier Logistical Center, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 61979 ) Under Contract No. CONUS 18-265 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Christine M. Rister, Esq. Law Office of Christine Rister

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Melwood Horticultural Training Center, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62370 ) Under Contract No. N40080-18-D-0306 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Larysa M. Kautz, Esq. Counsel APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jense

OPINION NAJAM, Judge STATEMENT OF THE CASE Master Copy & Reproduction Center, Inc., d/b/a Master Copy Design & Production Center ("Master Copy"), appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Copyrite, Inc., Ikon Capital, Inc., and Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. (collectively "Ikon") on its claim for breach of contract.1 We affirm.