Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “The Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y.”
WHITE, ROSEMARY v. THE DIOCESE OF BUFFALO N.Y.public domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 350 CA 15-01147 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. ROSEMARY WHITE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THE DIOCESE OF BUFFALO, NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (ANGELO S. GAMBINO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (KATIE
Diocese of Buffalo v Office of the N.Y. State Attorney Gen. (2025 NY Slip Op 25147) [*1] Diocese of Buffalo v Office of the N.Y. State Attorney Gen. 2025 NY Slip Op 25147 Decided on June 25, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Ally, J.
Salerno v. Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y.public domain
Salerno v Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y. (2018 NY Slip Op 03251) Salerno v Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y. 2018 NY Slip Op 03251 Decided on May 4, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
Golden v. The Diocese of Buffalo, NYpublic domain
Golden v The Diocese of Buffalo, NY (2020 NY Slip Op 03354) Golden v The Diocese of Buffalo, NY 2020 NY Slip Op 03354 Decided on June 12, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Report
White v. Diocese of Buffalopublic domain
*1471Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered March 31, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint and denied the cross motion of plaintiff for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff co
White v. Diocese of Buffalopublic domain
*1471Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered March 31, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint and denied the cross motion of plaintiff for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff co
Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalopublic domain
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mahoney, J.), entered December 3, 2002, which granted plaintiff’s motion for “reargument/renewal” with respect to defendant Dana Mulivich’s motion and adhered to its original decision. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Hochreiter v Diocese of Buffalo ([appe
Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalopublic domain
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mahoney, J.), entered August 6, 2002, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it granted the motion of defendant Dana Mulivich be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed and the order is modified on the law by denying the motion of defendants Diocese of Buffalo and North
Oehler v. Diocese of Buffalopublic domain
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of the motion of defendants seeking summary judgment dismissing the claim alleging that they were negligent in failing to maintain their premises in a rea*968sonably safe condition. In preparation for a physical education class at the Quee
Diocese of Buffalo v. Buczkowskipublic domain
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons *995stated in the following memorandum: Petitioner appeals from the dismissal of its CPLR article 78 proceeding brought to review a determination of the Buffalo Zoning Board of Appeals. Petitioner applied to the Commissioner of Inspections and Licenses for a permit to convert its property at 4 Vermont Street (used until April, 1980 by Buff
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. *560 Schweitzer, Ct. Ref.), entered March 25, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for summary judgment on its counterclaims, declared that, among other things, plaintiff defaulted under a contract to purchase real property, entitling
City of Buffalo v. Diocese of Buffalopublic domain
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The Roman Catholic Diocese of Buffalo (defendant) owned property with frontage on Niagara Square and West Genesee Street. Prior to 1965, the premises were occupied by an old brick office building lacking modern improvements. In 1965 the building was razed and the lot was blacktopped and leased for use as a parking lot. On February 18, 1970 the city obtain
Diocese of Buffalo v. Statepublic domain
Burke, J. (dissenting). In this case, here by permission of this court, the claimants, Diocese of Buffalo and St. Stanislaus, have been denied just compensation. When the State takes land for a public purpose, the owner of the taken land is indeed entitled to be compensated for what he has actually lost in economic terms. The majority today concludes that an established cemetery which, as has been found by the t
Pater v. City of Buffalopublic domain
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered July 22, 2014. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants City of Buffalo and Buffalo Police Department for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced individual actions alleging personal injuries arising out of incidents of sexual a
Pater v. City of Buffalopublic domain
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered July 22, 2014. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants City of Buffalo and Buffalo Police Department for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced individual actions alleging personal injuries arising out of incidents of sexual a
Diocese of Buffalo v. Statepublic domain
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The basic figures and method of evaluation used in [above] case, decided herewith, are also applicable to this case (contrary to the findings of the trial court), except that the unsold graves at time of taking, the acres
Matter of Century Indem. Co. v Office of the N.Y. Attorney Gen. 2026 NY Slip Op 02328 April 16, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. In the Matter of Century Indemnity Company, Petitioner-Appellant, v Of
Diocese of Buffalo v. Statepublic domain
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved *959and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: In modifying the award made for the permanent appropriation of cemetery land we adopt the following basic figures which were found by the Court of Claims, based
Dutton v Young Men's Christian Assn. of Buffalo Niagara (2022 NY Slip Op 04238) Dutton v Young Men's Christian Assn. of Buffalo Niagara 2022 NY Slip Op 04238 Decided on July 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New Yor
This action was commenced on May 17, 2017, on behalf of Brewster Marshall ("Plaintiff"), who suffers from postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome as well as other ailments, and who was a high school student within the Horseheads Central School District (the "District"). (Dkt. 1). Plaintiff has since reached the age of majority and has been substituted as the new party plaintiff. (Dkt. 58 at 1 n.1; see Dkt. 57). On August 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed