⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “The Farm, LLC”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-01-04 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00008
Sunnyview Farm, LLC v Levy Leverage, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00008) Sunnyview Farm, LLC v Levy Leverage, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00008 Decided on January 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-01-04 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00008
Sunnyview Farm, LLC v Levy Leverage, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 00008) Sunnyview Farm, LLC v Levy Leverage, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00008 Decided on January 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BATISTA MADONIA, III; ANGELA MADONIA; JOSEPHINE ARGENTO; and THE FAMILY FARM ON 41, LLC, Appellants, v. TAMELA MADONIA, Appellee. Nos. 2D2023-1064, 2D2023-2041 CONSOLIDATED
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BATISTA MADONIA, III; ANGELA MADONIA; JOSEPHINE ARGENTO; and THE FAMILY FARM ON 41, LLC, Appellants, v. TAMELA MADONIA, Appellee. Nos. 2D2023-1064, 2D2023-2041 CONSOLIDATED
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 4522
Benchmark Farm, Inc. v Red Horse Farm, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 04522) Benchmark Farm, Inc. v Red Horse Farm, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 04522 Decided on June 20, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York St
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 01944
Ragusa v Drazie's Farm II, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 01944) Ragusa v Drazie's Farm II, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 01944 Decided on April 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017-07-11 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 ME 150; 167 A.3d 557
PER CURIAM [¶ 1] Camden Hills Farm by the Sea, LLC (Camden Hills), appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Rockland, Worth, J.) granting a summary judgment to Kevin R. Hall in his foreclosure action pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 6321 (2016). On appeal, Camden Hills contends that the District Court should have dismissed Hall’s second foreclosure action as bar
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017-05-26 · Published · cited 32× · 164 A.3d 990; 170 N.H. 17
HICKS, J. The plaintiff, Fat Bullies Farm, LLC (Fat Bullies), and the counterclaim defendants, Donald Gould and Peter Simmons, appeal various findings and rulings of the Superior Court ( Wageling , J.) made during the course of litigation with the defendants, Alan and Donna Perkins and Lori and Bret Devenport, involving the sale of a 3.1 acre horse farm in North Hamp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 1815
W. Rogowski Farm, LLC v County of Orange (2019 NY Slip Op 01815) W. Rogowski Farm, LLC v County of Orange 2019 NY Slip Op 01815 Decided on March 13, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Dillon, J., J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 5391
Matter of Sheets v Airy Ridge Farm, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 05391) Matter of Sheets v Airy Ridge Farm, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 05391 Decided on July 19, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2021-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
June 16, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2019-95-Appeal. (NC 16-231) Middle Creek Farm, LLC, et al. : v. : Portsmouth Water & Fire District et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers a
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 3× · 798 F.3d 603; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14552; 2015 WL 4927002
WOOD, Chief Judge. Before deciding to build a power plant, energy companies and the system operator of an electrical grid must calculate the anticipated cost of connecting the proposed plant to the grid. These determinations occur in a highly regulated environment. Not surprisingly, sometimes the calculations need to be corrected. This case deals with who should bear the costs o
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 721 S.E.2d 387; 218 N.C. App. 577; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 215
721 S.E.2d 387 (2012) In the Matter of Appeal of FAMILY TREE FARM, LLC from the decision of the Halifax County Board of Equalization and Review concerning the valuation of certain property for tax year 2007. No. COA11-540. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 7, 2012. *388 Family Tree Farm, LLC, pro se. Parker Poe Adams &a;
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010-07-21 · Published · cited 2× · 699 S.E.2d 771; 305 Ga. App. 337; 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2593; 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 719
699 S.E.2d 771 (2010) The RIVER FARM, LLC et al. v. SUNTRUST BANK. No. A10A1500. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 21, 2010. *772 Cohen, Pollock, Merlin & Small, Gus H. Small, Jr., Brent W. Herrin, Atlanta, for appellants. Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Matthew T. Covell, Atlanta, for appellee. ANDREWS, Presiding
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-06 · Published · cited 1× · 122 A.D.3d 972; 995 N.Y.S.2d 824; 2014 NY Slip Op 07536; 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7486
Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Nolan Jr., J.), entered September 4, 2013 in Saratoga County, which, among other things, granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff and defendant own separate parcels of real property located on Thompson Hill Road, a town highway by use, in the Town of East Greenbush, Rensselaer Cou
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 5× · 141 A.D.3d 632; 34 N.Y.S.3d 618
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants violated certain provisions of a conservation easement and injunctive relief, which was commenced by the filing *633 of, in effect, a complaint dated July 2, 2009, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oran
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 116 N.Y.S.3d 462; 180 A.D.3d 1353; 2020 NY Slip Op 954
Carroll v Willow Bend Farm LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 00954) Carroll v Willow Bend Farm LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 00954 Decided on February 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
Jul 16 2013, 6:53 am FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: ROBERT S. DANIELS JOSHUA A. BURKHARDT MATTHEW L. KELSEY Beers Mallers Backs & Salin, LLP DeFur Voran, LLP Fort Wayne, Indiana Fishers, Indiana STEPHEN R. SNYDER
DJL Farm LLC v. EPApublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 15‐2245, 15‐2246, 15‐2247 & 15‐2248 DJL FARM LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents. ____________________
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 470 S.W.3d 48; 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 827; 2014 WL 7184548
OPINION Arnold B. Goldin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Brandon 0. Gibson J. and Kenny Armstrong, J. joined. This consolidated appeal stems from the attempted foreclosure of real property in Tipton and Haywood County. In commencing the present case, Plaintiffs filed complaints in Chancer