Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “The Lancaster Group, LLC v. Bishop”
Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Group, LLCpublic domain
693 S.E.2d 723 (2010) Timothy G. KORNEGAY, Plaintiff, v. ASPEN ASSET GROUP, LLC, C. Steve Clardy, Michael H. Clardy, Carlton S. Clardy, Jr., Rocking B. Farms, LLC, Basic Electric Company, Inc., and Earth Products Company, LLC, Defendants. No. COA09-71. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 1, 2010. *727 Bishop, Capitano &
Susan Davis Van Dyke v. the Navigator Grouppublic domain
Opinion filed December 31, 2020 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-18-00050-CV __________ SUSAN DAVIS VAN DYKE ET AL., Appellants V. THE NAVIGATOR GROUP ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court Martin
Sampson v. School District of Lancasterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER SURRICK, District Judge. Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Deposition of Donna Weldon, Esquire (Doc. No. 49) and Defendants’ Response thereto and Cross Motion for Pro*472tective Order (Doc. No. 51). For the following-reasons, Plaintiffs Motion will be denied, and Defendants’ Motion will be
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 01/31/2017 09:08 AM CST - 477 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 24 Nebraska A ppellate R eports STATE ON BEHALF OF NATALYA B. & NIKIAH A. v. BISHOP A. Cite as 24 Neb. App. 477 State of
Boring v. Zoetis LLCpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/13/2021 08:13 AM CDT - 270 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports BORING v. ZOETIS LLC Cite as 309 Neb. 270 Martin Boring, appellee, v.
Boring v. Zoetis LLCpublic domain
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) BORING V. ZOETIS LLC NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). MARTIN BORING, APPELLEE, V.
Navigator Group v. Susan Davis Van Dykepublic domain
Opinion filed February 27, 2026 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00030-CV __________ NAVIGATOR GROUP ET AL., Appellants V. SUSAN DAVIS VAN DYKE ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court
Navigator Group v. Susan Davis Van Dykepublic domain
Opinion filed February 27, 2026 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-24-00007-CV __________ THE NAVIGATOR GROUP ET AL., Appellants V. SUSAN DAVIS VAN DYKE ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 118th District Court
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
American Homecare Supply Mid-Atlantic LLC v. Gannonpublic domain
NEALON, J., A respiratory products and medical equipment supplier seeks to preliminarily enjoin its former clinical liaison from continuing her employment with a competing provider based upon the non-competition clause contained in her employment agreement. The employee contends that her restrictive covenant is unenforceable since it was executed after she began her employment with her former employer and was not specifi
GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. Under the Natural Gas Act ("NGA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 717 - 717z, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") has the power to issue "certificates of public convenience and necessity" authorizing private developers to con
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
ACCEPTED 03-14-00718-CV 4288348 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF : No. 171 MM 2014 ATTORNEY GENERAL, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERVISING JUDGE OF THE THIRTY- : FIFTH STATEWIDE INVESTIGATI
Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Servicespublic domain
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Having previously dissented from the denial of a stay pending appeal in this case, I now have a second opportunity to consider the government’s violation of the religious freedoms of Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation (“Conestoga”) and its owners, the Hahns, a family of devout Mennonite Christians who believe in the sanctity of human life. The Hahns do not want to be forced
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS