⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “The Lands Council v. Martin”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL, a Washington  nonprofit corporation; OREGON WILD, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, and SIERRA CLUB, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KEVIN MARTIN, Forest Supervisor of the Umatilla National Forest U.S. Forest Service, and the No. 07-35804 UNI
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL; OREGON  NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; SIERRA CLUB, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KEVIN MARTIN, Forest Supervisor No. 06-35781 of the Umatilla National Forest, D.C. No. U.S. Forest Service; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-02-12 · Published · cited 2× · 479 F.3d 636; 2007 WL 624737
ORDER Defendants-Appellees’ letter dated February 15, 2007, requesting that the court strike or correct portions of the opinion is construed as a petition for panel rehearing and is ordered filed. The mandate issued February 12, 2007, is recalled to allow the *638 court to rule on the petition for panel rehea
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-06-25 · Published · cited 18× · 529 F.3d 1219; 38 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20151; 66 ERC (BNA) 2025; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13366; 2008 WL 2513054
529 F.3d 1219 (2008) The LANDS COUNCIL, a Washington nonprofit corporation; Oregon Wild, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Hells Canyon Preservation Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, and Sierra Club, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kevin MARTIN, Forest Supervisor of the Umatilla National Forest U.S. Forest Service, and the United States Forest Service, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-03-02 · Published · cited 36× · 479 F.3d 636; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4790; 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20045; 2007 WL 624737
479 F.3d 636 The LANDS COUNCIL; Oregon Natural Resources Council; Hells Canyon Preservation Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Sierra Club, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Kevin MARTIN, Forest Supervisor of the Umatilla National Forest, U.S. Forest Service; United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees, andAmerican Forest Resource Council, an Oregon corporation; Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing L.L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-07-02 · Published · cited 547× · 537 F.3d 981; 38 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20163; 67 ERC (BNA) 1001; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13998; 2008 WL 2640001
537 F.3d 981 (2008) THE LANDS COUNCIL; Wild West Institute, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ranotta McNAIR, Forest Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees, Boundary County; City of Bonners Ferry; City of Moyie Springs; Everhart Logging, Inc.; Regehr Logging, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 07-35000. United States Court of Appeals,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL; WILD WEST  INSTITUTE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RANOTTA MCNAIR, Forest No. 07-35000 Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,  D.C. No. CV-06-00425-EJL Defendants-Appellees,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL; WILD WEST  INSTITUTE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RANOTTA MCNAIR, Forest Supervisor for the Idaho No. 07-35000 Panhandle National Forests; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,  D.C. No. CV-06-00425-EJL Defendants-Appellees,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-07-02 · Published · cited 9× · 494 F.3d 771; 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20160; 64 ERC (BNA) 1865; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15749; 2007 WL 1880990
Opinion by Judge FERGUSON; Concurrence by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Concurrence by Judge FERGUSON. FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: The Lands Council and the Wild West Institute (collectively, “Lands Council”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction to halt the Mission Brush Project (“Project”). Under the Project, the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service” or “Service
Massachusetts Land Court · 2021-03-29 · Published · cited 0×
AAA NORTHEAST vs. THE PEABODY CITY COUNCIL, MISC 19-000083 AAA NORTHEAST, Plaintiff, v. THE PEABODY CITY COUNCIL and THOMAS L. GOULD, DAVID C. GRAVEL, ANNE M. MANNING MARTIN, RYAN MELVILL, THOMAS J. ROSSIGNOLL, JON G. TURCO, PETER M. MCGINN, JAMES MOUTSOULAS, EDWARD R. CHAREST, JOEL D. SASLAW, and MARK J. O'NEILL, as they are the members of the PEABODY CITY COUNCIL, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999-02-08 · Published · cited 27× · 167 F.3d 1287; 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1313; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1833
167 F.3d 1287 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1313 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL, a non-profit membership organizationon behalf of its members; National Cattleman's Association,a non-profit membership organization on behalf of itsmembers; American Sheep Industry Association, a non-profitmembership organization on behalf of its members; AmericanFarm Bureau Federation, a non-profit membership organizationon behalf of its
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2023-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-0173 Filed December 20, 2023 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES ROBERT MARTIN, Deceased. TODD A. KERMOADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CHRISTY AINSWORTH and LESLEE SORENSEN, Executors of the ESTATE OF JAMES ROBERT MARTIN, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cass C
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999-02-08 · Published · cited 1× · 167 F.3d 1287; 1999 WL 64802
ORDER ON REHEARING The Secretary has petitioned the court for rehearing, requesting that it delete the highlighted portion of the following sentence as unnecessary to the court’s holding and incorrect as a matter of law: “Congress intended that once the Secretary established a grazing district under the TGA, the primary use of that land should be grazing unless the Secretary withdraws the land from grazing use in accordance with the w
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-09-01 · Published · cited 5× · 154 F.3d 1160; 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20116; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21390; 1998 WL 559362
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. The question before us on this appeal is whether the Secretary of the Interior acted within his authority under the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934(TGA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 315 et seq., the Federal Lands Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq., and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq., when he promulgated new regul
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022-08-30 · Published · cited 20× · 281 A.3d 618; 2022 ME 48
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2022 ME 48 Docket: BCD-21-416 Argued: May 10, 2022 Decided: August 30, 2022 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., JABAR and HORTON, JJ., CLIFFORD, A.R.J., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J.* NECEC TRANSMISSION LLC et al. v. BUREAU OF PARKS AND LANDS et al. STANFILL, C.J. [¶1] The
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-04-29 · Published · cited 9× · 101 F.4th 369
Case: 22-20603 Document: 142-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 29, 2024
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 56× · 492 P.3d 586; 2021 NMSC 026
Office of the Director New Mexico 13:39:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-026 Filing Date: June 30, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38356 SEN. CLIFF PIRTLE, REP. ZACH COOK, REP. REBECCA DOW, SEN. CRAIG BRANDT, REP. WILLIE MA
Rancheria v. Martinpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/12/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Tehama) ---- GREENVILLE RANCHERIA, C096097 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 21CI000234) v. ANGELA MARTIN et al.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999-06-22 · Published · cited 118× · 181 F.3d 38; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13735; 1999 WL 398414
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts appeals from an injunction restraining en *45 forcement of the Massachusetts Burma Law, which restricts the ability of Massachusetts and its agencies to purchase goods or services from companies that do business with Burma.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
3000-3032 ST. CLAUDE * NO. 2022-CA-0813 AVENUE, LLC * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS FOURTH CIRCUIT AND THE NEW ORLEANS * CITY COUNCIL STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM