Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “The Lands Council v. Martin”
The Lands Council v. Martinpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL, a Washington nonprofit corporation; OREGON WILD, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, and SIERRA CLUB, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KEVIN MARTIN, Forest Supervisor of the Umatilla National Forest U.S. Forest Service, and the No. 07-35804 UNI
The Lands Council v. Martinpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL; OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; SIERRA CLUB, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KEVIN MARTIN, Forest Supervisor No. 06-35781 of the Umatilla National Forest, D.C. No. U.S. Forest Service; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,
The Lands Council v. Martinpublic domain
ORDER Defendants-Appellees’ letter dated February 15, 2007, requesting that the court strike or correct portions of the opinion is construed as a petition for panel rehearing and is ordered filed. The mandate issued February 12, 2007, is recalled to allow the *638 court to rule on the petition for panel rehea
Lands Council v. Martinpublic domain
529 F.3d 1219 (2008) The LANDS COUNCIL, a Washington nonprofit corporation; Oregon Wild, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Hells Canyon Preservation Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, and Sierra Club, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kevin MARTIN, Forest Supervisor of the Umatilla National Forest U.S. Forest Service, and the United States Forest Service, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, Defendants
Lands Council v. Martinpublic domain
479 F.3d 636 The LANDS COUNCIL; Oregon Natural Resources Council; Hells Canyon Preservation Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Sierra Club, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Kevin MARTIN, Forest Supervisor of the Umatilla National Forest, U.S. Forest Service; United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees, andAmerican Forest Resource Council, an Oregon corporation; Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing L.L.C.
The Lands Council v. McNairpublic domain
537 F.3d 981 (2008) THE LANDS COUNCIL; Wild West Institute, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ranotta McNAIR, Forest Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; United States Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees, Boundary County; City of Bonners Ferry; City of Moyie Springs; Everhart Logging, Inc.; Regehr Logging, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 07-35000. United States Court of Appeals,
The Lands Council v. McNairpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL; WILD WEST INSTITUTE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RANOTTA MCNAIR, Forest No. 07-35000 Supervisor for the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, D.C. No. CV-06-00425-EJL Defendants-Appellees,
The Lands Council v. McNairpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE LANDS COUNCIL; WILD WEST INSTITUTE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RANOTTA MCNAIR, Forest Supervisor for the Idaho No. 07-35000 Panhandle National Forests; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, D.C. No. CV-06-00425-EJL Defendants-Appellees,
Lands Council v. McNairpublic domain
Opinion by Judge FERGUSON; Concurrence by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Concurrence by Judge FERGUSON. FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: The Lands Council and the Wild West Institute (collectively, “Lands Council”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction to halt the Mission Brush Project (“Project”). Under the Project, the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service” or “Service
Aaa Northeast v. the Peabody City Councilpublic domain
AAA NORTHEAST vs. THE PEABODY CITY COUNCIL, MISC 19-000083 AAA NORTHEAST, Plaintiff, v. THE PEABODY CITY COUNCIL and THOMAS L. GOULD, DAVID C. GRAVEL, ANNE M. MANNING MARTIN, RYAN MELVILL, THOMAS J. ROSSIGNOLL, JON G. TURCO, PETER M. MCGINN, JAMES MOUTSOULAS, EDWARD R. CHAREST, JOEL D. SASLAW, and MARK J. O'NEILL, as they are the members of the PEABODY CITY COUNCIL, Defendants
Public Lands Council v. Babbittpublic domain
167 F.3d 1287 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1313 PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL, a non-profit membership organizationon behalf of its members; National Cattleman's Association,a non-profit membership organization on behalf of itsmembers; American Sheep Industry Association, a non-profitmembership organization on behalf of its members; AmericanFarm Bureau Federation, a non-profit membership organizationon behalf of its
In the Matter of the Estate of James Robert Martinpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-0173 Filed December 20, 2023 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES ROBERT MARTIN, Deceased. TODD A. KERMOADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. CHRISTY AINSWORTH and LESLEE SORENSEN, Executors of the ESTATE OF JAMES ROBERT MARTIN, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cass C
Public Lands Council v. Babbittpublic domain
ORDER ON REHEARING The Secretary has petitioned the court for rehearing, requesting that it delete the highlighted portion of the following sentence as unnecessary to the court’s holding and incorrect as a matter of law: “Congress intended that once the Secretary established a grazing district under the TGA, the primary use of that land should be grazing unless the Secretary withdraws the land from grazing use in accordance with the w
Public Lands Council v. Babbittpublic domain
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. The question before us on this appeal is whether the Secretary of the Interior acted within his authority under the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934(TGA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 315 et seq., the Federal Lands Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq., and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq., when he promulgated new regul
NECEC Transmission LLC v. Bureau of Parks and Landspublic domain
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2022 ME 48 Docket: BCD-21-416 Argued: May 10, 2022 Decided: August 30, 2022 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., JABAR and HORTON, JJ., CLIFFORD, A.R.J., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J.* NECEC TRANSMISSION LLC et al. v. BUREAU OF PARKS AND LANDS et al. STANFILL, C.J. [¶1] The
Elec Reliability Council v. Phillipspublic domain
Case: 22-20603 Document: 142-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 29, 2024
Pirtle v. Legis. Councilpublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico 13:39:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-026 Filing Date: June 30, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38356 SEN. CLIFF PIRTLE, REP. ZACH COOK, REP. REBECCA DOW, SEN. CRAIG BRANDT, REP. WILLIE MA
Rancheria v. Martinpublic domain
Filed 7/12/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Tehama) ---- GREENVILLE RANCHERIA, C096097 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 21CI000234) v. ANGELA MARTIN et al.
National Foreign Trade Council v. Natsiospublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts appeals from an injunction restraining en *45 forcement of the Massachusetts Burma Law, which restricts the ability of Massachusetts and its agencies to purchase goods or services from companies that do business with Burma.
3000-3032 St. Claude Avenue, LLC v. the City of New Orleans and the New Orleans City Councilpublic domain
3000-3032 ST. CLAUDE * NO. 2022-CA-0813 AVENUE, LLC * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS FOURTH CIRCUIT AND THE NEW ORLEANS * CITY COUNCIL STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM