Cases

2021 IL 126675 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 126675) MANCINI LAW GROUP, P.C., Appellant, v. THE SCHAUMBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellee. Opinion filed December 16, 2021. JUSTICE G

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges O’Brien, Ortiz and Friedman PUBLISHED Argued at Fredericksburg, Virginia RESTON ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, P.C., ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1792-23-4 JUDGE FRANK K. FRIEDMAN

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiff Ingrid Echevarria accused her former employer, as well as its owner and manager, of subjecting her to sexual harassment at her workplace and terminating her employment when she complained about the harassment. On June 30, 2014,. after a four-day trial, a jury found that Plaintiff had proven her retaliation claims under federal and

J-E03007-20 2021 PA Super 107 C.L. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : M.P. : : Appellant

J-E03007-20 2021 PA Super 107 C.L. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : M.P. : : Appellant

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: *453This litigation was prompted by a proposed, but never enacted, regulatory amendment; even today, years into the litigation, the parties' disputes occasionally tilt toward the speculative or the hoped-for, rather than the actual. At base, the suit concerns First and Fifth Amendment facial challenges to

OPINION FABE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Today we resolve two questions certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cireuit: | 1. Does Alaska law prohibit enforcement of a policy provision entitling an insurer to reimbursement of fees and costs incurred by the insurer defending

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Demetra Baylor brought this case against defendant Mitchell Ruben-stein & Associates, P.C., alleging that defendant violated various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., the D.C. Debt Collection Law, D.C

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC20-1467 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—BIENNIAL PETITION. March 3, 2022 PER CURIAM. Before the Court is the biennial petition of The Florida Bar (Bar) proposing amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar Rules). 1 The Bar proposes amending thirty-one existing

MEMORANDUM DECISION R. KIMBALL MOSIER, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Rhino Energy LLC and Castle Valley Mining LLC (collectively “Rhino”) have moved for summary judgment on Count VI of their Second Amended Complaint (Count VI) and on the twenty-two counterclaims (Amended Counterclaims) filed by Defendants C.O.P. Coal Development Company (COP) and ANR Company, Inc. (ANR). Rhino is

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00735-CV Cottonwood Development Corporation, Appellant v. Preston Hollow Capital, LLC; PHCC LLC; and Winstead, P.C., Appellees FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 22-1985-C368, THE HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge This is a class action lawsuit brought by Plaintiff Practice Management Support Services, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Practice Management”) on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated. R. 1. It seeks damages from Defendants Cirque du Soleil, Inc., Cirque du Soleil (US), Inc., and other as yet unnamed Cirque du Sol

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION UNDER RULE 59(E) TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT RELATIVE TO THE FINDINGS AND RULINGS CONCERNING THE PRE-SUIT NOTICES UNDER G.L.C. 183A, § 6(C) (DOCKET ENTRY # 66); MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, MARCUS, ERRICO, EMMER & BROOKS, P.C., FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR TO ALTER AND AMEND JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #68) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. After a si

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1293 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—CHAPTERS 3 AND 14. September 7, 2023 CORRECTED OPINION PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar (Bar) petitions the Court to amend seventeen rules within chapters 3 and 14 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. 1 With some mo

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ POST-TRIAL MOTIONS MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION. co CO A. Factual Background. co CO 1. The parties and their relation to each other co CO 2. The facts surrounding Hagen’s Bring. CO CO 05

ORDER J. Craig Whitley, United States Bankruptcy Judge In these eight related adversary proceedings, plaintiff seeks to avoid upward of $1,200,000 in prepetition transfers of the debtor’s property under Bankruptcy Code sections 547 and 548, as well as N.C.G.S. § 39-28 and to recover these monies per Code section 550. The numerous defendants and third-party defendants have re

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge. BP RE, L.P. (“BPRE”), filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief and, along with BP Automotive, L.P., 1 filed an adversary complaint in the bankruptcy court alleging various state-law tort and contract claims against multiple RML entities (“RML”).

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 24, 2011 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

OPINION BOUCHARD, C. This opinion concerns the proposed settlement of a stockholder class action challenging Zillow, Inc.’s acquisition of Trulia, Inc. in a stock-for-stock merger that closed in February 2015. Shortly after the public announcement of the proposed transaction, four Trulia stockholders filed essentially identical complaints alleging that Tr