Cases

FILED April 25, 2022 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

FILED April 25, 2022 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 3, 2002 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL LEWIS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 7127 Joseph H. Walker, Judge No. W2001-03121-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 26, 2003 A Lauderdale County jury convicted the defendant, Michael Lewis, of reck

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

OPINION RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge: In this death penalty case, Petitioner Tracy Cain (Cain) challenges the district court’s denial of his federal habeas petition. Cain was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of a couple, William and Modena Galloway, who resided in a home next to Cain’s father. The distric

653 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2009) The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BLUE TEE CORP., et al., Defendants. Case No. 03-CV-0846-CVE-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. September 2, 2009. *1169 Joseph H. Bates, III, Carney Williams Bates Bozeman & Pulliam PLLC, Little *1170

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1050 ____________ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, et al., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ____________ No. SC2022-1127

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84887-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. ORDER WITHDRAWING AND SUBSTITUTING OPINION BERNARD BELLEROUCHE, Appellant. The court has determined that it should withdraw the published opinion filed on March

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84887-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION BERNARD BELLEROUCHE, Appellant. DÍAZ, J. — A jury convicted Bernard Bellerouche of assault in the first degree and unlawful possession of a firea

Rel: August 22, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA LOREN J. LARSON JR., ) ) Supreme Cou

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-DR-00696-SCT STEPHEN ELLIOT POWERS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD W. McKENZIE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: We withdraw our prior opinion of March 13, 2018, City of El Cenizo v. Texas , 885 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2018), and substitute the following, the purpose of which is to eliminate reference to United States v

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. *902 Ian Pollard and others brought a class action complaint against Remington Arms Company, LLC; Sporting Goods Properties, Inc.; and E.I. Du Pont Nemours and Company (collectively "Remington"), in which they alleged certain Remington rifles were susceptible to un